Recommended Posts

Airlock is one of the most original WB visual styles I've seen in awhile.

It was created by MikeB for the GUI Olympics (http://www.guiolympics.com).

airlock-wb-ss.jpg

Here's what I like about it:

(1) It's very clean. It has a really good quality to it. Everything goes together with it.

(2) It's very unique. Title bar is on the bottom in a REVERSE-BeOS style.

I'm not sure I'd use it long term since I don't think I could get used to having title bar buttons on the bottom. But it is pretty damn creative which was the event it was entered into.

[Download]

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/172669-vs-guio-airlock/
Share on other sites

I used airlock for quite a while. I fell in love with it instantly! Although, I couldnt use it for too long because of the widgets. This is probably a skin that'll be better suited for a game machine, or a logon that doesnt get used too often. That being said, MikeB updated Airlock with a substyle that puts the widgets on top too, like normal. Give that a try. It loses some of it's flair, but, it's still slick as hell. MikeB completely deserved the gold for most creative visual style. And with WB's colouring feature, in doesnt have to be that blue (nothing wrong with it) you can make it olive, slate, ergonomic, whatever. I [heart] WB.

post-62-1086071033.jpg

Edited by dividebyzero
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/172669-vs-guio-airlock/#findComment-2196720
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

i think the normal version with the buttons on the top would have been better if it looked like the the toonXP style... not in the end of the title bar but just after the title... this way the wb wont lose its original style... if someone can said this to mike i think it would be a great addition..

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/172669-vs-guio-airlock/#findComment-2380660
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!