Recommended Posts

Alright, so I just bought a new pair of Mission skates (I love these to death) for outdoor roller hockey. Well, as you can guess, the wheels are made for indoor and after a few games, they're worn out already and I have to rotate them after every game.

My question is, can someone explain the numbers on the wheels other than the mmeasurements? IE 78mm & 78A or 80mm & 80A. I'm in the market for new wheels and E-Bay is filllleeeeddd with them just waiting for me to buy! Any explanation would be grreeaat! Thanks!

:)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/172943-roller-hockey-wheel-help/
Share on other sites

obviously the mm (millimieter) is the size of the wheel. If you have missions, theyre probably 72mm in the front (for accelleration and turning) and 80mm in the back for top end speed. the A is the hardness. Anything over 84A is good for for the street, if ur playing indoors on tile, then u want something softer in the 70's

btw, which missions did u get?

i have a pair of tours...forget which model...they are hi-lows too. they were a little cheaper than the equivalent missions, and had better bearings...

anyways, i was just looking at the latest tour line, and they stopped doing the hi-low, is mission going to all same size wheels too? wonder why they would change...

Is it just me or does Mission make the most unreliable skates ever? I remember when Mission used to sponsor my team and we got them free or for real cheap, they would always break. The boot would literally just break down after a few weeks. Sure Mission makes the best looking skates, but I just hate them now. The M1 sticks are horrible too, I think I only like there pants. And you are supposed to be leaned forward, you skate faster and are stronger on your feet and your center of gravity is lower. Alot harder to knock down and you are always ready to accelerate. I wish more people played roller hockey instead of ice.

you were sponsored by mission? we came 2nd place at nARCH when it was in Vancouver but we werent sponsored (by any big companies). Ive owned 3pair of mission and they were all fine, infact i use one of them for street and its still perfect. Probably one of the only skates that comfortably fit my feet.

i love my mission d1s. very comfortable. dont use them that much though since i play ice

i think missions make great roller skates but when it comes to ice i think they're lacking a little. just my opinion. i've owned ccm and bauer but something about mission ice doesnt want me to buy them

Vancouver was a few years ago, what team and division were you when you went to narch? All my brothers team has been sponsored since he was 7, maybe you don't know the right people. But now he wins his division at narch each year, so it is almost autmatic to get sponsors.

Tour was big at a time, i always thought they went bankrupt... honestly, i dont play rollerhockey anymore, but it seems as if Tour hsa fallen off the map... i may be wrong though (probably am)

i still hear about tour but mission has taken over. they say that tours are incredibly light. i dont know anyone that's bought them in awhile but they've won them in tourneys

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      262
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      86
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!