Recommended Posts

i was searching for a good-looking 17" LCD to complement my laptop, with that in mind i've narrowed my choices down to either Apple, Sony or Samsung cuz we all know they house some of the best industrial designers in the world. :) i took Apple out of the list right away as the technology is more than 3 years old, it's not worth paying a premium for an outdated piece of hardware even though it looks good. then i looked at Sony's displays, it looks really sleek but when i checked out the specs, i found it somewhat inferior because of the 30ms response time and the relatively low contrast ratio. as soon as i looked at Samsung latest offering, the Samsung 173P, i've got a winner! :D so without further ado, let's have a look at this beauty. :)

Specs:

17" Viewable Area

270 cd/m2 Brightness

700:1 Contrast Ratio :woot:

178/178 Viewing Angle(H/V)

25 ms Response Time

Analog/Digital Interface

1280x1024 Max. Resolution

16.7m colors

as y'all can see, this beauty has a contrast ratio of 700:1 which is above average, as most LCDs are either 400:1 or 500:1. The 270 cd/m2 brightness is also higher than the norm as most LCDs hover around 250 cd/m2. the viewing angle of 178? just blows my mind, i've never seen anything higher than this. 25ms response time might not sound too good for gamers, but after an hour of Halo and some dvd playing, i found that there's no noticeable ghosting at all, so i think the rating is just a worst case scenario.:))

the bezel and base are made out of magnesium alloy, as opposed to other flat panels that have cheap plastic casing. it feels extremely solid and durable. the back of the panel is made out of smooth glossy white plastic, like that on the Apple's iBook, it gives the whole thing a refined and elegant look. one thing i would like to mention is the buttonless design of the flat panel, well not exactly buttonless but there's only one button - the power button. in fact it's not actually a button, it's more like a touch sensor. coolness.:cool:: kudos to Samsung for removing the buttons, finally a flat panel that looks awesome in either landscape or portrait mode. all the brightness/contrast adjustment is done with the included software - MagicTune, i really love this feature.:))

i'll let the pictures do the talking now.:))

aaron901-IMG_0001.jpg

can be used with PC and Mac.>

aaron901-IMG_0002.jpg

aaron901-IMG_0003.jpg

touch the power button for 2 seconds and it switches from Mac to PC and vice versa.>

aaron901-IMG_0004.jpg

aaron901-IMG_0005.jpg

how slim and sleek it is...>

aaron901-IMG_0006.jpg

smooth glossy white finish at the back...>

so, to sum it all up..

the good:>

- contrast ratio of 700:1 that blows most other displays out of the window

- above average brightness rating of 270cd/m2

- mind-blowing viewing angle of 178?

- top-notch image quality

- portrait and landscape mode

- VESA mount for wall-mounting included

- both analog and DVI cables included

- buttonless design

- versatile tilt adjustment

- switch between computers at the touch of a button

- backed by a three-year parts, labor, and backlight warrantythe bad:b>

- some people may prefer OSD

- MagicTune only works in Windows

- one of the most expensive 17" LCDs out there

Final ratings: 9/10

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/173681-review-samsung-173p/
Share on other sites

while it's only sort of on topic, anyone know the order from worst to best of the letters on the end of the samsung model names?

one would think 175v > 173p because of the letter and the number, but it's not the case. What's the reasoning behind the system?

I love samsung's PVA monitors. I have a 172t myself and have been debating selling it inorder to get a 173p. Not too sure how big of a difference there would be though. Before discontinuing the 172t it had 700:1 contrast ratio and 250 cd/m for its specs. Blurring is different from person to person. I was unhappy with the blurring on my 25ms lcd until I got used to it. Now it doesn't bug me at all, and most ppl can't even discern it unless you show them exactly what to look for. However, if I use my brothers crt for awhile and then switch back to my lcd the blurring becomes apparent again. I am so jealous of both of your laptops.

They changed the specs to 700:1 right before they got rid of it. I don't know why, but at that time they readjusted the specs for there whole line. They changed the specs for the 191t to more closely align to the 191t+ and 192t (which use the same panel). Also, I have always wondered about the 172t having only 16.2 million colors. Does that make it a 6bit panel with dithering (like all those 16/12ms ones)? It seems that the official specs at the end were changed to 700:1, 16.2 million colors, and 25ms. usa 172t

edit: samsungs website it very annoying. They list the aspect ratio on there 17" and 19" monitors wrong (should be 5:4, not 4:3), and I just noticed that they listed the 172x's pixel pitch wrong (should be .264 not .294) on the main page (the general one, they fixed it on the usa page).

Ok from what I have been able to dig up its not a 6bit panel. It is an 8-bit from everything that I have read, only it is missing 500,000 shades. "What is interesting however, is that the 172T only supports up to 16.2-Million colors, which is odd since 'True-Color' is represented by 16.7-Million colors. However, after having done a month of Photoshop work on the 172T, I did NOT notice the 500,000 missing shades." That's the only reference I could find refering to this, owell. Owell, the colors are beautiful and I can't see any of the dithering that I notice on 6bit panels, so I will stop fussing over this, lol.

Edited by SonComet

I love these things to death.

I personall have two right next to each other. Really it just adds life to my room ;). Had one before it came officially out for months. I would recommend this monitor to anyone.

The only thing that bites is the OSD, no OSD and the utility to configure brightness and such is only available under Windows. However the monitor has great settings default. I use it all the time in Linux (Fedora Core 2 & Mandrake 10) and no problems what so ever.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!