Is the GANT 2 OCEAN port really needed?  

109 members have voted

  1. 1. Is the GANT 2 OCEAN port really needed?

    • hell yea.. its an awesome pack
      92
    • No, theres already one out
      17


Recommended Posts

Just wanna make a few things clear here. I dont wanna get into any competiton, race or whatsoever, neither did I want to get into one. I wasnt going to do this port at first because it would have been too much of a hassle to reshack all the files one by one and put them in the english files and that too specially for such a huge pack would be a big pain. Thats the reason why I never opted to port the pack when the pack was released on APC and was quite happy that xllx was doing the port till he dissappeared. But then on saturday, an idea clicked to me of how I could port this pack in a much easier and faster way and so I started on the pack.

Another reason why I started on this pack is because the recent releases of shell packs by jerome for Gant 2 Ocean and by Dlb for the Crystal shell pack have been done with installers and in such an amazing way, that the shell packs are installed with just a few clicks and which I plan to do the same for my pack, thus making things much easier to install and use for people using the pack.

The reason why evo posted that the pack would be out by wednesday is because I had told him I wud have it out by wednesday max. As I just needed 2 days for the pack and another 2 days to make a page for it on my site, and in that time the beta tests would be carried out too.

If you still dont believe me, I have no problems in holding back my release for Gant 2 Ocean and waiting for your gui replacer module to be released first if you want me to. Even whether it be a month from now, if you think im trying to get my pack out before yours.

Peace

you take things too literally, lol.. stress less :p i'll quote myself and bold the key element.

seems like some1 trying to race me, lol.

see that lol, it means laugh out loud.. which means i am not seriously worried about it and it doesnt bother me either. you have been working too had on this thing man :p

btw you could have ported everything in those sytem files to another shell pack by using restorator.. it allows you to drop and drag a whole folder of icons into another system file and replace those icons. could have had this pack out in no time. reshacker is a thing of the past.. it may be free but its not very good with features.

general rant at no1 in paticular:

i think shell packs should be a thing of the past and i would much rather see people embrace shellpacks..

im getting tired of seeing people complain that it doesnt work with their version blah blah.. that is why i like guir so much. but for those who refuse to let go of shell packs its their problem.. enjoy it.

if it wasnt for my exams ppl i would have had this here for you a long time ago.. but when im paying for my university education and getting no money for doing these module the thing that costs me money takes priority :D

cheers

Fizical

Take your time fiz.

I know kinda what your going through.

I have 5 assessments for college to hand in before Friday yet I seem to be spending all my time here :)

Get the exams out of the way first and do the module when you have time. It's not like we are going anywhere :)

o ok lol.

well i dont care..

If that wasnt there after the lol, then I wouldnt have thought you were serious at all.

I did try to port it with restorator when the pack was released, as I always use it for making my shell packs, but by doing so, it wouldnt replace/overwrite the icons but rather, it would add the icons from the french pack due to it being a french system file. Thats why I really wasnt keen on porting it coz i wud have to use reshacker n that wud take me ages.

well i've come across a major problem.. reshacker isnt allowing me to add new resources correctly.

this could delay my project indefinately... i certainly hope that isnt the case. anyway if a solution can be found.. hopefully its just my stupididity then all will be good :) and i can continue. however i wont be able to release this as early as i had planed, sorry people.

if you go to this post: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=176248

you will see that some of the things are named 0

but if i rename them and save it goes back to 0

if i delete and add the resource again it corrupts the file.

i dont know if i've reached some sort of magical size limit or something but its not happy with me.

@devil: do you know how to add new resources with restorator? because i cant find the feature anywhere and never have been able to hence why i need reshacker. or if you know of another program that allows you to add new resources that would be great.

thanx jalz and its alright devil... im going to try restorator 2004 because from the help section it seems they added the feature to add new resources.. so i will check it out either tonight or tomorrow when i get the time and see how it works.. hopefully it will do what i need it to and i can get this module going again :)

mine has been delayed these past few days due to entertaining girlfriend at my place.. my apologies :p

she will need to do some study soon for her upcomming exam during that time i will work on it again

when i get to work on it next (tomorrow hopefully) i will give you a new estimate on release time.

i think devils is comming along well

Well ive started working since tuesday n I dont get much time to work on it with uniacid whos doing the batch scripts. All the files have been ported. just having problems with the batch script. if anyone is really good at batch scripts pls contact me or uniacid.

Edited by ЀṾ

about 90% complete on my module. sitty at 10mb in a *.exe but probably will come as a *.rar

currently changing close to 900 resources in over 100 files with over 250 icons and many bitmaps.. its going to be great. its a complete package in a small file. beta testers it will be comming to you within 24 hours i hope and then only a ocuple days until release if all goes well

cheers

Fizical

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!