Is the GANT 2 OCEAN port really needed?  

109 members have voted

  1. 1. Is the GANT 2 OCEAN port really needed?

    • hell yea.. its an awesome pack
      92
    • No, theres already one out
      17


Recommended Posts

cant edit last post..

beta has been uploaded and pm sent to those who said they would test. please if you didnt get a message and you were willing to test pm me asap and i will get back to you.

take care and goodluck testers :)

cheers

fizical

when its working, lol

unfortunately im facing the constant rebooting error that others have found when making module. this is a first timer for me so im a little upset by it, lol. however im facing problems as vmware is giving me the sh?ts and wont let me get into recovery console to try and find the error. so im going to have to find another alternative... however unabated is being of great help and is testing out with vmware on his manchine.

onces it working i'll be sure to let you all know.. and it will be dont worry. then some testing again and release

looks like we both are having a hard time trying to get this out lol

My files are fine, only thing we're having slight probs with the batch script.

we keep coming out with new ideas everyday to find a work around lol, but cant get around it.

well, lets see what happens

:)

looks like we both are having a hard time trying to get this out lol

My files are fine, only thing we're having slight probs with the batch script.

we keep coming out with new ideas everyday to find a work around lol, but cant get around it.

well, lets see what happen:)br />

:)

Maybe you could try a replacer script, those work well. Or did you already consider that?

well thanks to the hard work of unabated i can safely say beta testing will resume tonight and a release on monday should occur. ofcourse that depends how many bugs are found and if i bother to try and repair the file thats causing the problems but thanks very much to unabated :)

i will be uploading tonight for beta testers again.. hope you enjoy it. i should be getting adsl in a month when they finally put it in my little town.. im excited and will make uploading 11mb files like this a much faster process than 1 hour :(

at devil: did u manage to fine any people for batch scripts.. it would be really dissappoiting if no1 has put their hand up for you as so many people will certainly use it.

yes, i have uniacid working with me on the batch scripts but we would always encounter problems. Thats why we needed more assistance in the batch area to know where we were going wrong. But thats all ok now, as I will be having the installer itself do all the copying, replacing and backing up of the files.

Just hope all goes well :)

will begin uploading in a few mins for beta testers..

in the mean time does anyway, devil maybe, know how to fix these bugs.. maybe you have a resource for these i can use devil that is without the bad edges??

also where is that checked file and 2 computer search. its a different checked file to the other one in that side menu.

btw couldnt edit the post b4 this so here is another one :(

cheers fizical

post-42-1087735909.jpg

Yeh,

I'm not trying to step on fizicals toes here but he has got most of the changes made but a few more bugs have cropped up.

I think he's just trying to iron out the last few bugs and get it tested so hopefully it shouldn't be long.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!