DDR 400 with 533 FSB CPU?

By +Steve B
in Hardware Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Max Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted (edited)

If you are running single channel DDR400....you wont get max use because its not running the 533Mhz that it should.

If you are running Dual Channel DDR400 then it will - as it willl be able to run any CPU up to 800mhz FSB without any bottlenecks.

If you ARE using dual channel - it will downclock to dual channel DDR266 - as 266*2 = 533mhz (DDR266 was designed for the 533 bus P4)

EDIT: Make sure your mobo is compatible with the DDR400 memory. Though it should work.

Edited by absolutemaxpayne.co.uk
Veteran

PCKing

Posted
Posted
  Iluvatar said:
The 533mhz FSB operates with 266mhz DDR i believe. no problems with anything higher though.

My 533mhz FSB supports PC2700 or DDR333 memory...

You should find in the BIOS to set the speed of memory higher than 266 or 333... not sure that 400 is an option but I know you can set it higher.

Grand Master

Max Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

You do not need DDR333 or DDR400 to run a P4 533Mhz bus.. It needs dual channel DDR266, thats final. Anything more than that is a bonus for overclocking. Anything less is just a bottleneck.

Only the latest Pentium 4's have a quad pumped FSB, not the 533mhz revisions.

200*4=800mhz fsb. Thats why we need DUAL channel DDR400 so that It reaches the 800mhz the chip requires.

This is how I would like to think of it:

Dual channel DDR266 was designed for the P4 533mhz.

Dual channel DDR400 was designed for the P4 800mhz.

Single channel DDR266 was designed for the older Athlon chips (Thoroughbred - 266mhz fsb)

Single channel DDR400 for the newer Athlon chips.

Single channel DDR333 is for the later Athlon Barton chips, which actually ran at 333mhz.

Note: There is no Dual channel DDR333 because no chip runs at 666Mhz FSB!

Mentor

+Steve B Subscriber²

Posted
  • Author
  • Subscriber²
Posted

The reason why i was asking was because my MB died a couple of days ago. I do NOT have the money to buy the more exspensive stuff right now. So I need one that is cheap but works fine and that I can buy it new. So I was looking at a board with the i848P chipset. Is anyone familiar with that chipset and does it support dual channel ddr? I saw a MB on newegg.com and it seems to support it. Although, I am not sure. Can anyone tell me? Thanks for your help.

Mentor

Nathanael

Posted
Posted
  absolutemaxpayne.co.uk said:
You do not need DDR333 or DDR400 to run a P4 533Mhz bus.. It needs dual channel DDR266, thats final. Anything more than that is a bonus for overclocking. Anything less is just a bottleneck.

Only the latest Pentium 4's have a quad pumped FSB, not the 533mhz revisions.

200*4=800mhz fsb. Thats why we need DUAL channel DDR400 so that It reaches the 800mhz the chip requires.

This is how I would like to think of it:

Dual channel DDR266 was designed for the P4 533mhz.

Dual channel DDR400 was designed for the P4 800mhz.

Single channel DDR266 was designed for the older Athlon chips (Thoroughbred - 266mhz fsb)

Single channel DDR400 for the newer Athlon chips.

Single channel DDR333 is for the later Athlon Barton chips, which actually ran at 333mhz.

Note: There is no Dual channel DDR333 because no chip runs at 666Mhz FSB!

Xeons have a bus of 667MHz.

Veteran

PCKing

Posted
Posted
  absolutemaxpayne.co.uk said:
You do not need DDR333 or DDR400 to run a P4 533Mhz bus.. It needs dual channel DDR266, thats final. Anything more than that is a bonus for overclocking. Anything less is just a bottleneck.

Only the latest Pentium 4's have a quad pumped FSB, not the 533mhz revisions.

200*4=800mhz fsb. Thats why we need DUAL channel DDR400 so that It reaches the 800mhz the chip requires.

This is how I would like to think of it:

Dual channel DDR266 was designed for the P4 533mhz.

Dual channel DDR400 was designed for the P4 800mhz.

Single channel DDR266 was designed for the older Athlon chips (Thoroughbred - 266mhz fsb)

Single channel DDR400 for the newer Athlon chips.

Single channel DDR333 is for the later Athlon Barton chips, which actually ran at 333mhz.

Note: There is no Dual channel DDR333 because no chip runs at 666Mhz FSB!

400mhz FSB = 100x4

533mhz FSB = 133x4

800mhz FSB = 200x4

All Pentium 4's are quad pumped FSB.

Put a 533mhz chip on a board with dual channel memory and it will take DDR333 running in dual mode

Put an 800mhz chip on a board with dual chanel memory and it will take DDR400 running in dual mode

Why is it so hard to beileve this? I have 333 memory on my 533 FSB chip and its recognized and runnning at 333...

"Note: There is no Dual channel DDR333 because no chip runs at 666Mhz FSB!"

- Put a 533 FSB chip on an 800 FSB motherboard and you will be able to run DDR333 in dual channel mode.

Grand Master

Max Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
  PCKing said:
Why is it so hard to beileve this? I have 333 memory on my 533 FSB chip and its recognized and runnning at 333...

Yeah, I didn't say that it wouldn't work, im saying that it is not neccessary. Like I said, anything is a bonus over DDR266 because 266*2 = 533.

  Quote
- Put a 533 FSB chip on an 800 FSB motherboard and you will be able to run DDR333 in dual channel mode.

Again, it will run DC DDR333, but it still doesn't need DC DDR333. It only needs DC DDR266.

Grand Master

ANova

Posted
Posted

fsb = 133 MHz x 4 = 533 MHz bus

Dual channel allocates each memory stick it's own channel to operate on rather then sharing one channel. You can think of it as a 3 lane road being expanding into two 3 lane roads; the ultimate purpose being to alleviate any bandwidth limitations that might occur while using single channel. Dual channel has nothing to do with memory operating frequency. DDR266 can operate in both single channel and dual channel assuming the motherboard allows it, it does not increase to DDR333 in dual channel.

To answer the thread starter's question. PC3200 (DDR400) will work perfectly fine with a P4B, it will just run at a slower clock speed. Memory can always run at speeds less then what it was made for, it cannot be run at speeds greater then what it was meant for. The only thing I'd suggest is you use a newer motherboard that supports all the cpus for compatibility reasons. Some of the older motherboards may have trouble with newer and faster ram.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Intel Nova Lake alleged performance shows massive improvement, could answer AMD 3D V-cache

      By dismuter · Posted

      A 10% IPC boost is underwhelming for what is supposed to be a major generational leap. Unless it's accompanied by higher clock speeds, or the IPC boost is greater than 10% in games, I'm not sure that it will be enough to compete with Zen 5 X3D, let alone Zen 6 X3D for gaming. Single-core performance is super important and cannot be compensated with more cores, whereas the reverse is true, you can compensate for fewer cores with better single-core performance.
    • Microsoft officially confirms that Windows 11 version 25H2 is coming later this year

      By bikeman25 · Posted

      Been happy with Windows 11 myself even since first release in 2021, sure it hasn't always been perfect, but nothing is per say.. Issues i did have was minor ones, which is normal with any OS really. I still use Windows 10 at times on my unsupported Gaming Laptop, and i find myself using the Windows 11 Desktop more. Eventually replacing Gaming Laptop with a Windows 11 Compatible one somehow, someway this year or possibly next year at the latest, but its gonna happen--(May save all my Bing reward points except the 1000 to have extended support for 10) then work on getting quality Replacement hard)
    • It's a feature, not a bug: Windows Hello face unlock no longer works in the dark

      By ZipZapRap · Posted

      Geez, this is dumb. I use my laptop sometimes in the dark when doing astrophotography to control my astro-PC... this explains why I have to keep entering my PIN when logging back in. So stupid. I can't see the keyboard in the dark, and I can't have lights everywhere to light it up because everything is very light sensitive (including my eyes!).
    • Intel Nova Lake alleged performance shows massive improvement, could answer AMD 3D V-cache

      By ThaCrip · Posted

      Naturally. I don't care about brand loyalty at all as it's all about price/performance/reliability etc (even what RejZoR said below is a great point to). basically bang-for-the-buck. because at the end of the day... one wants the cheapest possible price to maintain a certain minimum level of performance (or thereabouts). because generally after a certain point with CPU and GPU's the price starts to sky rocket without that much difference in performance where it really matters. p.s. historically I have bought more Intel CPU's and NVIDIA GPU's but I have had some AMD CPU's and one AMD GPU.
    • Intel Nova Lake alleged performance shows massive improvement, could answer AMD 3D V-cache

      By JayZJay · Posted

      Both of these companies as well as Qualcomm and Apple need competition. Otherwise, they just coast. I don't prefer macOS, though I like some of Apple's hardware, but if anyone needs competition, it is Apple. Their prices are already outrageous and they need to have a reason to produce good hardware and at least keep prices remotely reasonable. (It is criminal what they charge for RAM upgrades especially.) Qualcomm needs to push AMD and Intel not to be so sloppy with the performance/efficiency aspect. Granted, AMD has been doing quite well in this respect considering they are not an ARM architecture. I personally want to have more options that truly compete with Macbook Air and Macbook Pro's on the Windows side. It is difficult to achieve what Apple does since they control the entire stack and that is fundamentally different for Windows PCs other than maybe Microsoft Surface PCs.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Hartej earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      TsunadeMama earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      shaheen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Cole Multipass earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Alexander 001 earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      565
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      182
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      175
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      111
    5. 5
      Som
      106
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!