Recommended Posts

If you are running single channel DDR400....you wont get max use because its not running the 533Mhz that it should.

If you are running Dual Channel DDR400 then it will - as it willl be able to run any CPU up to 800mhz FSB without any bottlenecks.

If you ARE using dual channel - it will downclock to dual channel DDR266 - as 266*2 = 533mhz (DDR266 was designed for the 533 bus P4)

EDIT: Make sure your mobo is compatible with the DDR400 memory. Though it should work.

Edited by absolutemaxpayne.co.uk
  Iluvatar said:
The 533mhz FSB operates with 266mhz DDR i believe. no problems with anything higher though.

My 533mhz FSB supports PC2700 or DDR333 memory...

You should find in the BIOS to set the speed of memory higher than 266 or 333... not sure that 400 is an option but I know you can set it higher.

You do not need DDR333 or DDR400 to run a P4 533Mhz bus.. It needs dual channel DDR266, thats final. Anything more than that is a bonus for overclocking. Anything less is just a bottleneck.

Only the latest Pentium 4's have a quad pumped FSB, not the 533mhz revisions.

200*4=800mhz fsb. Thats why we need DUAL channel DDR400 so that It reaches the 800mhz the chip requires.

This is how I would like to think of it:

Dual channel DDR266 was designed for the P4 533mhz.

Dual channel DDR400 was designed for the P4 800mhz.

Single channel DDR266 was designed for the older Athlon chips (Thoroughbred - 266mhz fsb)

Single channel DDR400 for the newer Athlon chips.

Single channel DDR333 is for the later Athlon Barton chips, which actually ran at 333mhz.

Note: There is no Dual channel DDR333 because no chip runs at 666Mhz FSB!

The reason why i was asking was because my MB died a couple of days ago. I do NOT have the money to buy the more exspensive stuff right now. So I need one that is cheap but works fine and that I can buy it new. So I was looking at a board with the i848P chipset. Is anyone familiar with that chipset and does it support dual channel ddr? I saw a MB on newegg.com and it seems to support it. Although, I am not sure. Can anyone tell me? Thanks for your help.

  absolutemaxpayne.co.uk said:
You do not need DDR333 or DDR400 to run a P4 533Mhz bus.. It needs dual channel DDR266, thats final. Anything more than that is a bonus for overclocking. Anything less is just a bottleneck.

Only the latest Pentium 4's have a quad pumped FSB, not the 533mhz revisions.

200*4=800mhz fsb. Thats why we need DUAL channel DDR400 so that It reaches the 800mhz the chip requires.

This is how I would like to think of it:

Dual channel DDR266 was designed for the P4 533mhz.

Dual channel DDR400 was designed for the P4 800mhz.

Single channel DDR266 was designed for the older Athlon chips (Thoroughbred - 266mhz fsb)

Single channel DDR400 for the newer Athlon chips.

Single channel DDR333 is for the later Athlon Barton chips, which actually ran at 333mhz.

Note: There is no Dual channel DDR333 because no chip runs at 666Mhz FSB!

Xeons have a bus of 667MHz.

  absolutemaxpayne.co.uk said:
You do not need DDR333 or DDR400 to run a P4 533Mhz bus.. It needs dual channel DDR266, thats final. Anything more than that is a bonus for overclocking. Anything less is just a bottleneck.

Only the latest Pentium 4's have a quad pumped FSB, not the 533mhz revisions.

200*4=800mhz fsb. Thats why we need DUAL channel DDR400 so that It reaches the 800mhz the chip requires.

This is how I would like to think of it:

Dual channel DDR266 was designed for the P4 533mhz.

Dual channel DDR400 was designed for the P4 800mhz.

Single channel DDR266 was designed for the older Athlon chips (Thoroughbred - 266mhz fsb)

Single channel DDR400 for the newer Athlon chips.

Single channel DDR333 is for the later Athlon Barton chips, which actually ran at 333mhz.

Note: There is no Dual channel DDR333 because no chip runs at 666Mhz FSB!

400mhz FSB = 100x4

533mhz FSB = 133x4

800mhz FSB = 200x4

All Pentium 4's are quad pumped FSB.

Put a 533mhz chip on a board with dual channel memory and it will take DDR333 running in dual mode

Put an 800mhz chip on a board with dual chanel memory and it will take DDR400 running in dual mode

Why is it so hard to beileve this? I have 333 memory on my 533 FSB chip and its recognized and runnning at 333...

"Note: There is no Dual channel DDR333 because no chip runs at 666Mhz FSB!"

- Put a 533 FSB chip on an 800 FSB motherboard and you will be able to run DDR333 in dual channel mode.

  PCKing said:
Why is it so hard to beileve this? I have 333 memory on my 533 FSB chip and its recognized and runnning at 333...

Yeah, I didn't say that it wouldn't work, im saying that it is not neccessary. Like I said, anything is a bonus over DDR266 because 266*2 = 533.

  Quote
- Put a 533 FSB chip on an 800 FSB motherboard and you will be able to run DDR333 in dual channel mode.

Again, it will run DC DDR333, but it still doesn't need DC DDR333. It only needs DC DDR266.

fsb = 133 MHz x 4 = 533 MHz bus

Dual channel allocates each memory stick it's own channel to operate on rather then sharing one channel. You can think of it as a 3 lane road being expanding into two 3 lane roads; the ultimate purpose being to alleviate any bandwidth limitations that might occur while using single channel. Dual channel has nothing to do with memory operating frequency. DDR266 can operate in both single channel and dual channel assuming the motherboard allows it, it does not increase to DDR333 in dual channel.

To answer the thread starter's question. PC3200 (DDR400) will work perfectly fine with a P4B, it will just run at a slower clock speed. Memory can always run at speeds less then what it was made for, it cannot be run at speeds greater then what it was meant for. The only thing I'd suggest is you use a newer motherboard that supports all the cpus for compatibility reasons. Some of the older motherboards may have trouble with newer and faster ram.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes, agree 100%!! It baffles me that so many people are so outspoken about hating Win11 but have taken zero steps towards trying out other operating systems. If you don't like the direction Microsoft is taking Windows, then staying on Windows 10 is only the short-term solution, clearly the long-term solution is to find an OS you prefer. Let's be honest about two things...Windows 10 was FAR from perfect, it makes many of the same offenses that 11 does, but maybe to a lesser degree. Also, if anyone is holding out hope that Windows 12 will be some kind of return to the good-old-days, they are being extremely naive. What will end up happening is they will get dragged along to W11 once W10 support fully ends (and they realize 10 IoT isn't what they thought it was), just like they got dragged from Windows 7 to 10. Then start the cycle over, they will figure out how to make W11 work the way they want it to and will start complaining about how bad W12 is.
    • only works for 1 microsoft account . im on rp channel and have 2 pcs with the same microsoft account, i pc got it the other one did not
    • Your first comment about one needing to send all their data to Microsoft's "cloud" to continue Windows 10 support was of course ridiculous but I can't disagree here. I am not sure why the OP would wait to switch to Linux if their Mom just uses a browser as she can use the same one with Linux. Why would she care what OS is running? Install /configure Linux Mint or Ubuntu LTS and almost no maintenance really.
    • Seagate Exos 20 TB BarraCuda 16 TB 7200 RPM CMR hard disk drives are limited-time deals by Sayan Sen Currently, there are some great sales on SSDs, in particular, NVMe M.2 ones, like this SK hynix P41 Platinum P41. However, if you are in the market for a hard disk drive (HDD), then Seagate has you covered. That is because two high-capacity drives, the Exos X20 20TB and the BarraCuda 16 TB are currently at great prices (purchase links down below). Since both of them are high capacity models, they are based on CMR or Conventional Magnetic Recording technology which is typically great for robust use cases like on NAS or (media) home servers and similar such scenarios. However, the Exos is enterprise-grade quality so it is definitely what you would want for 24x7 usage, but the BarraCuda can also serve pretty well but will be a better option for backup purposes. The Exos X20 promises power-on hours of 8760 per year, while the BarraCuda claims 2400. The latter comes with double the DRAM cache, though with 512 MB of it, while the former has 256 MB, but it should still be plenty. In terms of data transfer speed, Seagate promises up to 285 MB/s (272 MiB/s) from the Exos X20 and the BarraCuda is rated for up to 190 MB/s. These are the maximum sustained data transfer rates for the two drives. Since the Exos X20 is an enterprise-class product Seagate does disclose its random performance throughput, which is 168 IOPS for reads and 550 IOPS for writes, respectively. While the BarraCuda's randoms are not specified it is expected to be lower and to compensate, it packs double the DRAM cache. Get the HDDs at the links below: Seagate Exos X20 ST20000NM007D 20TB SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive: $379.00 + $50 off with promo code SACET2372 => $329.00 (Newegg US) Seagate BarraCuda ST16000DM001 16TB SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Drive: $194.99 (Newegg US) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Why do you think the writing is on the wall? Tesla continues to have the highest selling models on the planet, and they continue to grow on that despite their junk reliability rating. I'm not going to buy one because of the continued build quality issues (and lack of Carplay), but I appreciate that they're the best player in an EV market that is massively lacking in infrastructure and affordability. Besides the EV technology needing to eventually outpace gasoline, self-driving technology is undoubtedly going to be the future. It's not going to happen tomorrow and not even in 10 years, but within our lifetimes, most cars on the road will be self-driving. That's the only way to solve the issue of a million deaths on the road. Waymo is using technology that's simply too expensive, which means it has to charge high fares. Tesla is going to blow past them with their ~$40k car and further yet when they release that weird looking 2-seater. Pretty soon Nvidia is going to be a market player, Amazon will be a player, and possibly the other 20+ startups that are working on a vehicle. I'd like to revisit this in a year and see how the market looks. I'm willing to bet there will be a huge increase of driverless cars on the road, and I doubt that Waymo is going to be the majority of them. Waymo isn't profitable for Google, so it's entirely possible the plug gets pulled as soon as several players leave them in the dust.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      DrRonSr earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Sharon dixon earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Parallax Abstraction earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      956400 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidfegan earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      616
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      229
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      167
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      161
    5. 5
      Som
      144
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!