Using Microsoft BootVis (Windows XP)


Recommended Posts

  Overview said:
Bootvis is a tool for easily enabling capture and graphical display of boot and resume performance trace data in Windows XP.? Bootvis by itself will not change a system's boot or resume performance.? Bootvis is intended as an aid to allow designers and manufacturers to characterize their system's performance during Windows startup in order to identify areas for further investigation and opportunities for performance improvement.

Bootvis can be used to analyze Windows XP startup performance from all off or sleep states, including:

System cold boot (power on from the ACPI S5 state)

Resume from hibernate (the ACPI S4, or "suspend to disk" state)

Resume from standby ( the ACPI S3, or "suspend to RAM" state)

Difficulty: Easy

I will show you how to use Microsoft BootVis to speed up your systems bootup and shutdown times. First of all, download the latest version of Microsoft BootVis (v1.3.37.0) from here or here.

Now, install and run it. The opening screen is simple, and blank. To start...

  • STEP 1 - Ensure all of the tickboxes on the left are ticked
  • STEP 2 - Click on thTraceb> menu at the top, and choosNext Boot + Driver Delaysb>
  • STEP 3 - ClicOKb> then thReboot Nowb> button. When your computer restarts, dnoti> click on anything until BootVis opens and closes (wait around 1 minute).
  • STEP 4 - When it has appeared and gone, re-open BootVis.
  • STEP 5 - Click on thTraceb> menu at the top again, and choosOptimise System.b>
  • STEP 6 - ClicReboot Nowb>, and when your computer restarts, dnoti> click on anything until BootVis opens and shows a small window explaining what it's doing. It has finished when the box closes.

All done! Your computer will now bootup (and hopefully shutdown!) quicker.

Edited by King Mustard
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/175246-using-microsoft-bootvis-windows-xp/
Share on other sites

Umm maybe you should check http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/syspe...ot/BootVis.mspx

  Quote
Please note that Bootvis.exe is not a tool that will improve boot/resume performance for end users. Contrary to some published reports, Bootvis.exe cannot reduce or alter a system's boot or resume performance. The boot optimization routines invoked by Bootvis.exe are built into Windows XP. These routines run automatically at pre-determined times as part of the normal operation of the operating system.
  Quote
Please note that Bootvis.exe is not a tool that will improve boot/resume performance for end users. Contrary to some published reports, Bootvis.exe cannot reduce or alter a system's boot or resume performance. The boot optimization routines invoked by Bootvis.exe are built into Windows XP. These routines run automatically at pre-determined times as part of the normal operation of the operating system.

quote from microsoft.com

Haha even your quote said it King Mustard :)

  Quote
Bootvis by itself will not change a system's boot or resume performance.

Oh well, no biggie. I was under the impression bootvis could speed stuff up too, heck it was posted on the front page saying so a while back.

  • 3 weeks later...

wow the version number is very... elite

anyway bootvis doesnt kinda work for me, i choose trace ---> next boot + driver delays, and i try to reboot... and then my computer gets stuck forever on the windows boot screen, have to press the reset button and get windows to use previous good configuration... the first time i did this, it gave a blue screen of death, had to try to go into safe mode and restart the computer

right now if i run bootvis it will stop the booting up of windows, have to press the reset button and choose last known good configuration, and then one minute after the boot up of my computer i will get the dialog box asking about the traces, but if i click on either the ok button or the close button, i get some cannot find boot + driver delays . bin file ... and now my computer's all sluggish as well, like clicking on my desktop to get rid of the start menu , i click, then have to wait for half a second for the start menu to go away

  • 1 month later...

I prefer Zoom.It may not be freeware but worked(I say "worked" cause previously I had a p3 p33mgh and then it gave me a noticable speedup..but onmy current AMD Athlon 3000+ 64 bit the diff is not noticable..btw,Hare also helped speeding up my sys a lot)) for me.

BootVis did have some effect prior to SP1, and at that time Microsoft's website also gave detailed instructions for its use and said it would improve performance. It was still a tool for OEM's, but it was publicly available and proven effective. On my XP "gold" it reduced my boot time from 45s to <25s. In SP1 the boot optimization was built into XP as is now stated on Microsoft's site.

So in a way this guide is correct, but it's only really useful for those still running XP "gold", which should be none. If anyone is still running XP "gold", they should seriously consider upgrading to SP1 (or SP2, if available in their language) ASAP, instead of just tuning the old XP. SP1 and newer basically tunes itself, at least when it comes to defragmentation stuff.

  insanekiwi said:
never been a fan of bootvis. driverheavens tunexp for me :yes:

BootVis and TuneXP do completely different things. TuneXP is a tweaker, that is, it automates various registry hacks and stuff like that. BootVis analyzes the layout of the files required at boot, defragments and optimizes those files and tunes the loading order. In SP1, that functionality was moved inside the Windows system files so the boot tuning is now performed automatically as part of the defragmentation process.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I wasn't implying people should be forced to use a single launcher. I prefer user choice. If Windows includes a decent game launcher, great, people might choose to use it if they want to. If it sucks, no one will use it. I would be completely against anyone being forced in that direction, just like I am against being forced to use 3rd party launchers if I choose to use Steam.
    • Sounds good, but that'd require Microsoft to develop and API of some sort and then get all the developers to support it... but everyone knows that while others will support Microsoft, Microsoft won't support itself and will kill off the feature... again. Microsoft has tried this trick in Windows 9x era, they tried it with the games library in Vista, they tried a big push for Games for Windows Live, and then again in Windows 8 with the WPA apps via their mobile/windows phone eco system. Now they're trying it again, and it's lets not forget that this isn't a push to make PC gaming better. It's not. To do that they need to provide at least the same level of quality and feature set of Steam, otherwise why else are gamers going to not use Steam. Right now Xbox app and everything Microsoft centric around the PC gaming front is exclusively for their new Xbox brand push to make everything an Xbox. Your Toaster, your cat, your PC, your VR headset, everything is a Xbox and that'll last for this generation of Xbox now probably. Then, like Microsoft always has done and will do, they'll drop it like a hot potato and everyone will be left crying. Point in case, bringing Xbox games to the ROG handheld, their entire point of this... They're marketing it as if it's an Xbox console in a handheld, yet, it's not. There are going to be Xbox gamers who think, they'll be able to pickup their Xbox one games and play them on a handheld like Nintendo and Steam Deck users... except they're going to quickly find out that their Xbox game library is almost entirely missing or games they've already purchased on the Xbox need to be purchased again on the 'this is an Xbox' handheld.
    • man i remember hearing about new icons years ago and we still are at this......
    • That's entirely speculation. If he wants these on the road, I would assume (and hope) that he's tested the crap out of these things in real world scenario simulations until he (and any government regulators) are 100% convinced that they are as safe as a human driver before letting them on the streets of a real city. You don't test an automated ton of steel and aluminum with a big engine capable of going up to 200 mph by sticking it a public street with a human behind the wheel "just in case" and hoping for the best.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Camlann earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      fredss earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      fabioc earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      GoForma earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      GoForma earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      637
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      224
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      219
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      142
    5. 5
      Xenon
      135
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!