[DEFINITIVE] Gmail queue !


Recommended Posts

Ive PM'ed 5 people about Gmail, and only 4 got back with me today. Glad to see so many people have contributed though. :happy:

Oh and who can forget Myie2_user and all of Ztrangs hard work. Thank you both for organizing this and making it as successful as it was. xPlatinum as well.

goodmorning :)

I like that new system. But won't there be problems when someone says he has invites (3 or so), around ten people will message him. The list has te be edited even more quickly than it used to be.... Or am I missing something?

Having an exams 'statistics' in like an hour and a half... Then on to my last one finally, though a difficult one

EDITED

so its:

smokiethebandit (0)

DaCoOlNeSs (0)

myie2_user (0)

tool32782 (0)

threetonesun (0)

vip (0)

Chicane-UK (0)

Xer34 (0)

Space Guy (0)

rumbleph1sh (4)

aaronsam (0)

xStainDx (0)

kainashi (0)

Liquid (0)

acerr (0)

evolution (3)

notsnarc (1)

kawai (3)

flii (4)

The next 15 people who want GMail can have it, apparently. By the time we give away 11 invites, I think we'll have like 50 more,anyways :D

ok, generous donors, mind to invite me?

name first, last: Dc lee

email: [email protected]

edit: got my invite already. thanks much.

ps: if u happen to use yahoo, check for invites in yr bulk folder. dunno if yahoo does that on purpose or not :)

Edited by sunpoh
ok, generous donors, mind to invite me?

name first, last: Dc lee

email: [email protected]

PM one of the people on the list in the last page that has invites left, like someone with (1) or (3). Please, don't PM those with (0), they don't have any, and we are in enough confusion as it is with this new system change.

Look at the list, pm an inviter* that has some invites to give, as well post that you did pm whichever person with the invites.

are we now inviting anyone who asks??....or are there still any restrictions?

(I suspect this has been told already, but I don't really feel like reading through the last 20 pages trying to find it :p )

smokiethebandit (0)

DaCoOlNeSs (0)

myie2_user (0)

tool32782 (0)

threetonesun (0)

vip (0)

Chicane-UK (0)

Xer34 (2)

Space Guy (0)

rumbleph1sh (4)

aaronsam (0)

kainashi (0)

Liquid (0)

acerr (0)

evolution (3)

notsnarc (1)

kawai (0)

flii (4)

Is the list, pm these fools with a number, not the 0's :p

No restrictions, rumble, we took that off since we had no list lol :)

Edited by myie2_user
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'd say the first one failed to be as popular as Apple anticipated, but the easy adjustment here is to make fewer of them next time around. It would only be a "flop" if it isn't possible for Apple to recover the design and factory tooling costs given the number of units sold, which I doubt would be the case. It isn't like no one bought them; it just failed to become the new hot phone of the year.
    • You're right that it does not follow the plain meaning of the word, but in this context, it is a legal term defined in 49 U.S.C. Kind of how "wire fraud" laws apply even if a physical wire was not used. Given that it is codified in law, and it isn't just automotive journalists that don't understand evolving technology, I highly doubt congress would change a well understood term just because technology makes the term slightly less actuate.
    • This is exactly why I keep saying we are not ready for human free self-driving. These little "bugs" are may seem like random one-offs. There was also the Waymo that drove between police with drawn weapons and the suspect they were pointing them at. From a software perspective it is easy to understand how those extremely rare situations may not have been programed for, but that is the point. If AI needs to be told to watch out for every possible contingency, then it can never be successful. There will always be the possibility of a first encounter that the AI needs to understand to avoid.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Final by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 | 14.6MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      586
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      74
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!