Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have Windows Server 2003 RTM MSDN with legal MSDN key and I change pid number in this file setupp.ini from 000 to 270 and install but after install it still required activation. I try some illegal corporate keys for testing and one key has extended activation time to 60 days but still required activation. Can anyone help me that how can I bypass activation and install windows server 2003 as Volume Licence using legal MSDN key?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/180497-windows-2003-activation/
Share on other sites

If you have a legal key, why bypass activation?

Oh, I don't know... maybe privacy concerns? Not wanting Big Brother watching what you enter? (That's the way a lot of people view activation -- plus it's darned inconvenient if you don't have an Internet connection on the computer you're installing Windows on... I don't like having to call someone to be able to use a product I've already paid for).

If you have a legal key, why bypass activation?

I change my hardware oftenly and it is hard to activate windows after every changes. In Windows XP if I change pid number to 270 in setupp.ini file than it not required activation because it become corporate why this mehtod is not working in Windows 2003, did in Windows 2003 pid number 270 is diffrent than Windows XP if yes which is for Windows 2003?

. In Windows XP if I change pid number to 270 in setupp.ini file than it not required activation because it become corporate

To be accurate, changing that to 270 in XP doesn't make it the VLK version. It only makes it take VLK keys. You need to change the number before that 270 to make it VLK, and you also need to change the ExtraData section (If I remember the name correctly -- it's the only other thing in setupp.ini). This is also true for Windows Server 2003. It's not that 270 that counts... you can leave it as 000 if all the other numbers are for the VLK version, and it will act as the VLK version, but accept the regular retail keys.

However, all this is bordering on the "cracking" topic, so I'll be quiet now.

I will tell you there ARE tools do this I will not tell you where they are or how to find them....

Changing product key IS permitted (there is even a KB article on this) but will not work uner win2003 but it can still be done even under volume licence edition...

the only reason you would ever need to change your key is if you are being locked out of windowsupdate

,Jun 20 2004, 22:08] I will tell you there ARE tools do this I will not tell you where they are or how to find them....

Changing product key IS permitted (there is even a KB article on this) but will not work uner win2003 but it can still be done even under volume licence edition...

the only reason you would ever need to change your key is if you are being locked out of windowsupdate

He's not really changing his PID, read his wording. He's changing setupp.ini, which just controls how pidgen.dll verifies the product keys and writes them out into the registry of the new installation. He's changing the type of PID needed to install Windows. BUT, he really needs to change the extradata in order to remove the need for activation. This is exactly what the corpfiles do under XP (and the 2003 corpfiles, as well).

Yes, there are tools that can remove the need for activation, like the already infamous TweakNT, but I'd recommend against them. It has the bad habit of reappearing when it's least welcome... like after using Windows Update, and then you find out your Windows installation is now hosed...

If you're an MSDN subscriber, there is NO issue with activating it. If necessary, all you have to do is call them.

And what you are trying to do is a violation of the MSDN EULA.

How I am violation of MSDN EULA? I am just asking that how to make Windows Edition diffrent? I know that MSDN version of windows can be install as OEM, Retail and Corporate but I have fail to install it as corp. so I asking to experts not like you little :p . Keep in mind that I am not sharing any product key and any MSDN secret info ;) . You can modify any portion of setup and it is not violation of EULA. You need to double read my post above with :woot: that what I am saying? Don't waste your and my time with stupid reply.

Hi,

I have Windows Server 2003 RTM MSDN with legal MSDN key and I change pid number in this file setupp.ini from 000 to 270 and install but after install it still required activation. I try some illegal corporate keys for testing and one key has extended activation time to 60 days but still required activation. Can anyone help me that how can I bypass activation and install windows server 2003 as Volume Licence using legal MSDN key?

Don't you have access to the ISOs on MSDN?

He should have the ISO's on MSDN. And yes, if you are trying to tinker around with PID in terms to cirumvent activation, then yes that is against the EULA. Now with that said, changing the number to 270 isnt going to make it VLK, like oddballz19 said, you have to change the nubmers preceding them. But, since you have MSDN, why don't you just save the trouble and just activate? Please don't tell me the big brother issue. ;)

Why would this person go through all that mess when there is an ISO waiting for him to download at MSDN?

For as big of a deal as he's making about bypassing activation, you REALLY think he's a MSDN member? He's an amateur warez monkey that dosen't know what he's doing. :p

For as big of a deal as he's making about bypassing activation, you REALLY think he's a MSDN member? He's an amateur warez monkey that dosen't know what he's doing. :p

HAHAHA, You're probably right! :D

Yeah, the thread starter does sound suspicious :shifty:

P.S. to thread starter - Geocities does not allow hotlinking.

Suspicious is an understatement. Honestly, if he was an MSDN subscriber, he'd get a legal key with his ISO and could activate no problem. His excuse of not wanting MS to know is BS, because all MS gets is a hash based on his hardware. Seriously, if you're gonna crack and pirate software, at least have a half-assed idea what you're doing next time, okay?

i understand why you hate activation, i've been using my XP upgrade cd that i bought since i first got it... its a pain in the ass now that i have to call microsoft every time i want to install it... to hear the same question "why are you reinstalling windows" and to explain the same thing "i've passed my allowance for internet activations and im doing a monthly format" (OT: btw, how many internet activations are there allowed now... b/c i just formatted recently and in the past 10 months before it, i didnt reinstall (hell i didn't even touch my cd), and it says i can't)

I have Windows Server 2003 RTM MSDN with legal MSDN key and I change pid number in this file setupp.ini from 000 to 270 and install but after install it still required activation.

Then activate it. MSDN copies come with a key and you don't have to modify anything, they will activate normally. It is completely legal. If you have any more questions, contact Microsoft Support (Y)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!