• 0

Visual Studio.Net 2005 Express beta


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
I think this is a nice gesture from MS. But, with the onset of Mono, surely it would be easier just to use that and not have a crippled IDE -- esp. in the future when it becomes more feature packed?

Mono isn't an IDE, so I'm completely missing your point. The Express products offer full access to the .NET Framework.

  • 0
Anyway to actually download the real installer files, not the one that connects to a server and downloads them? I already have Visual Basic .NET Standard, might be nice to try C# and C++, I downloaded both express versions.

I found this before and was going to post it, but wanted to check first. (Y)

Don't know if you can download them by themselves rather than using the web install. But after you complete the web install, they're all saved in the Microsoft Visual XXX 2005 Express Beta directory in the application directory.

  • 0

You do realize this IS using Beta 1 of the .NET 2.0 framework right? Some of you were asking questions about differences between VS.net 2003 and the Express products. It's right there!

Read up on the millions of improvements .NET 2.0 brings (even to the C# developer).

  • 0
Yeah, it is using a beta of the Framework. But that beta is WAY faster than 1.1 final, and I've yet to find an actual bug in 2.0 beta 1.

No bugs, but there are going to be even more improvements ;)

If you're building ASP.net 2.0 web applications, try using the pre-complimation tool :D

  • 0

The first thing I noticed was that when you create a new project in C#, you are faced with new constructs like the 'partial' class. After a little research, I found out that alongside the upgrade to .NET Beta 2.0, the C# language was updated as well (http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/0...20/default.aspx). This makes me wonder if the language will ever stabilize, or with each version, the language modified that will most likely break old code? How will this work?

Anyway, not to deviate much from the topic, I have to say the new version of Visual Studio looks very promising.

Attaching a screenshot in case anyone is interested.

bwx

post-47-1088567076.jpg

  • 0

Well, you've actually got it backwards. The new version doesn't break old code. Old versions break new code. Every old-code project I've recompiled with 2.0 has compiled and run flawlessly, but 2.0 code that I try to run against 1.1 just crashes.

That's nothing new or terribly surprising. You can't, for example, run VB6 code on the VB4 runtime. Even Win32 code suffers from that, to some degree (there are plenty of APIs in Windows 2000 that won't run on NT4).

I would expect the language to evolve with each major release. Generics may not be something that the language absolutely NEEDS, but it's certainly welcome. Partial classes aren't really a must-have either, but they're certainly nice to have (good to get all of the initialization dreck away from my code).

  • 0

ok everyone, lets kill the suspense, im here...muhahahhahaha (damn...dont know how long ive been dyin to say tht :p)

anywayz, i attended the Pakistan Developer's conference (PDC) held by microsoft from Jun 15-17, where they really showed us a LOT of Visual Studio 2005, so i may be able to answer a few questions:

- firstly, like dannysmurf said, .NetFramework 2.0 does NOT break old code. It is fully compatible with the old code, and yet provides new interfaces and classes for writing better, simpler code. So theres no loss for you. In fact you dont even need to worry about your old applications not working on clients who have the framework 2.0, as they will work seamlessly.

- secondly about the changes to C#, well im not muhc of a C# programmer, but IMHO the differences and improvements in C# 2.0 seemed to make a lot of sense. Basically they have made all efforts to try and sell C# over java, by eliminating the complaints programmers had with C#, implementing the remaing few features where Java still had an edge over C#, plus improve on developer productivity, by simplifying many tasks. So in short, now C# 2.0 is DEFINITELY better than Java, if you leave out the cross-platform compatibility bit (which in my opinion is a JOKE, as to be able to implement tht cross platform compatibility in most cases you have to write enough extra code to accomodate all scenarios as you would if you developed applications seperately for each platform. still thats debatable, and not the point of this topic, so lets not start flaming and move on)

- finally, the biggest question here of the "express edition" being different from standard and pro. well this answer might seem funny to some of you. In visual studio 2005, microsoft has made SO MANY improvements with the IDE, that they have taken it to a totally new level. It is simply unbelievable what microsoft has been able to acheive this time. you can imagine the extent of this over haul by the fact tht when the presenter at the PDC made a simple, single tier database applications only with mouse clicks, WITHOUT stupid crammy wizards, and yet with under 10 lines of code, all the developers where so stunned they even forgot to clap. People sitting around me had their mouths LITERALLY open. Microsoft has REALLY made developing applications on their platform VERY attractive by reducing the amount of code that requires to be written to almost 1/3rd of what it was. How they have done this: well, by making minor simple, yet brilliant architectural changes, and introducing MANY new extremely powerful controls, that make life a LOT simpler. Also they have dramatically improved working on Team Projects, and added a lot more functionality in terms of packaging and deployement etc. For eg for ASP.net 2.0, you no longer need IIS to be installed, as VS 2005 pro (and maybe also standard) will come with its own server, tht will be less resource intensive, and work much faster, yet emulate the real IIS, so basically in the development stages you will be able to work faster, and have more debugging features. Similarly the list of improvements just goes on and on.

Now the catch: the BULK of these improvements will be available in the Professional and Standard Editions of VS 2005 in my opinion, and from the hints the lady at the PDC gave. Basically what the express edition will be, is a slight upgrade to the previous VS 2003, with the interface borrowed from its bigger brother VS 2005 pro and standard, and the internal plumbing upgraded to .Net Framework 2.0, with only a very small chunk of the MAJOR improvements available in the FUll new IDE.

What this means: Well, i think this Express edition is still a great idea, and NOT a rip off as im sure some ppl are gonna start claiming after my post. Why? well simply because it is STILL an improvement over the prvious VS, it is going to be comparitively VERY VERY cheap, and for all practical purposes, it gives you full access to all the features of the .Net Framework 2.0. So theoretically speaking, any application made on the Pro edition can ALSO be made on the express editions, except that the programmer would have to write a lot more code by himself.

phew! i hope ive covered everything! Im going down for breakfast right now. will come back later and check if theres something missing. long typing sessions make me hungry :D

danish

  • 0
Well, you've actually got it backwards. The new version doesn't break old code. Old versions break new code. Every old-code project I've recompiled with 2.0 has compiled and run flawlessly, but 2.0 code that I try to run against 1.1 just crashes.

That's nothing new or terribly surprising. You can't, for example, run VB6 code on the VB4 runtime. Even Win32 code suffers from that, to some degree (there are plenty of APIs in Windows 2000 that won't run on NT4).

I would expect the language to evolve with each major release. Generics may not be something that the language absolutely NEEDS, but it's certainly welcome. Partial classes aren't really a must-have either, but they're certainly nice to have (good to get all of the initialization dreck away from my code).

That is certainly good to hear. From reading that page, I thought that these new features (like iterators) were meant to replace existing ones (implementing the IEnumerable interface, etc.). If they are not planning on breaking old code, new constructs are ofcourse, like you said, welcome.

One thing I wonder is if Microsoft is actually stating that new versions of .NET (and the languages) will not break old code, or is it just by chance that they compile and run correctly?

bwx

  • 0
One thing I wonder is if Microsoft is actually stating that new versions of .NET (and the languages) will not break old code, or is it just by chance that they compile and run correctly?

Well, I think they're making a concerted effort to make sure that old code doesn't break. I mean, they're still trying to get .NET to catch on. The way to do that is NOT to make everyone rewrite their applications once a year.

  • 0

SQL Server 2005 Express will always be free (it says that on the MS site). The rest of them will be cheap (I'm guessing about $20 or $30 per product). SQL Server 2005 Express is like MSDE on steriods!

I can't wait until SQL Server 2005 Express Manager comes out. Finally, a free version of EM!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Trailer park trash “sport “, fits the current White House
    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!