Recommended Posts

Great app, jon. I hope you haven't messed it up a lot. :D

I'd love it if it sits in the status bar near my start menu (Thanks to the Longhorn clock by Rcube :D). When I click this button, this window you showed would pop up to show the latest details and another click of the status bar button would bring it back down.

Yes i am taking all of these ideas into consideration -- of course, it will be minimized to system tray and display msn-like toasts when you receive PM or suchlike...

Looiking for more ideas, which I am continually integrating to the app... :laugh:

seems pointless and stupid. i cannot rationalize using an external application to check private message's. why and how would ones private message usage become so massive. the need for implementing volume controlling and immediate access? instant messengers and email are to slow?

Hey, c'mon, try to make it yourself...

Note: I know, how is it, to program, cuz I program in C++, C, Visual Basic, Visual Basic .NET and C# .NET!

Try to write every action/function/exception yourself, than you can talk about something like "pointless" and "stupid". But if you can program, please, talk / write your comment smarter.

I like how this application is designed, I like the idea, but it's not designed for my type of use... You understand?

PS.: Private Messages are useful, if you didn't realiziate it... But it's up to you, your opinion.

Nice application, I would take a look on it... :)

seems pointless and stupid. i cannot rationalize using an external application to check private message's. why and how would ones private message usage become so massive. the need for implementing volume controlling and immediate access?  instant messengers and email are to slow?

-1, Troll :laugh:

someone, somewhere will use this. PMs are useful, and you get them fairly often if you are a (very) active member around here.

Hey, c'mon, try to make it yourself...

Note: I know, how is it, to program, cuz I program in C++, C, Visual Basic, Visual Basic .NET and C# .NET!

Try to write every action/function/exception yourself, than you can talk about something like "pointless" and "stupid". But if you can program, please, talk / write your comment smarter.

I like how this application is designed, I like the idea, but it's not designed for my type of use... You understand?

PS.: Private Messages are useful, if you didn't realiziate it... But it's up to you, your opinion.

Nice application, I would take a look on it... :)

i do not know why you needed to verbally attack me. i do not know why you commented on assumptions from my text instead of what is stated.

-1, Troll :laugh:

someone, somewhere will use this. PMs are useful, and you get them fairly often if you are a (very) active member around here.

again why is harassment necessary? you have quoted me yet your comment has nothing to do with what i said.

again why is harassment necessary? you have quoted me yet your comment has nothing to do with what i said.

it most certainly does...

you said: i cannot rationalize using an external application to check private message's

i said: someone, somewhere will use this.

you said: why and how would ones private message usage become so massive.

i said: PMs are useful, and you get them fairly often if you are a (very) active member around here.

furthermore, there was absolutely no harassment in my comment. The "-1, Troll" was followed by a :laugh: , implying a joke.

think before you post.

Could I just point out two things:

1) This is ALPHA software - just because all it can do is check for PMs at the moment doesn't mean I'm not going to integrate great new features in the future - I intend to

2) You may be interested to know that I am incorporating some of this code into other Neowin projects such as AeroBrowser and Neowinmessenger for new PM detection and automated login detection respectively

3) Please don't make comments about the lack of functionality of this application - admittedly, all it can do is check PMs at the moment which may not be needed by everyone right now, though I am in the process of adding new features...

1)oh oh oh, maybe you can make it go on neowin and go on the forums, and check pms too, and be able to post replies and all that. maybe it can work with other sites too. ya that would be cool.

oh, wait, nevermind, there is an app that does that already. its called firefox.

2)cant say i dont like that. this alone makes the whole app worthwhile. really good idea.

3)there is a lack of functionality in this application. :p

Can we add a feature that when a moderator bans you, your computer deletes everything on your hard drive?

lmfao... HAHA

That would be pretty cool..... but imagine it, so many people without blown up computers,

I can imagine keldyn and dazzla there counting how many "frags" they got on neowin today

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      565
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!