iTunes 'not CD-quality'


Recommended Posts

The iPod's low bit-rate has come under fire ? as are Apple claims that iTunes Music Store customers get "true CD audio".

The New York Times advises: "Love the iPod, but don't jump too hastily to fill it with thousands of dollars of iTunes. The tracks are not carbon copies of the CD originals, but compressed versions.

"The smaller files are handy for speedy downloads, space-saving for storage and perfectly serviceable for listening through ear buds when riding on the subway. Not what you will want, however, when your desktop computer becomes the home jukebox and wirelessly sends these simulacra to the entertainment centre in the living room."

In order to create a small file, Apple uses "an extreme form of compression that takes a sample of the sound at intervals," explains the report.

"The bit rate for iTunes, 128, is so low that when played side by side against the original, the difference is audible not only to audio enthusiasts, but also to mortals with ordinary hearing," reporter Randall Stross claims.

See what Apple has to say.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/186749-itunes-not-cd-quality/
Share on other sites

well the reporter who wrote that article has just discovered warm water. Of course they are going to be compressed version of the Cd tracks, who wants to download 100mbs+ per track? "Let me buy this CD, ill just let it download through the day..." Cmon, we all know that we are bound to loose quality as soon as you use a compression method. The New York times should give this guy the "Captian Obvious and his Retard Squad" award.

Did you know the Apple logo is not actually a full Apple? seriously its not !! :woot: ITS GOT A BITE OUT OMFG!! CHECK IT!! and if im not mistaken the leaf on top of the Apple logo PERFECTLY!! fits the bite mark OMFG someone get me a type writer I gotta get this to the people!!!

Did you know the Apple logo is not actually a full Apple? seriously its not !! :woot: ITS GOT A BITE OUT OMFG!! CHECK IT!! and if im not mistaken the leaf on top of the Apple logo PERFECTLY!! fits the bite mark OMFG someone get me a type writer I gotta get this to the people!!!

GET OUT!

Stick to downloading lossless files off usenet or other places

portable audio is never meant to be near as good as home audio, complaining that ipod is compressed is stupid though. I'd rather buy the CD, and rip it to the ipod then BUY their stupid compressed songs, I can compress it myself, and still have the original cd.

I guess for singles, eh, could just download it ;)

"128 provides good sound quality, especially when used in iPods. The majority of people have absolutely no idea what a bit rate is. If Apple offered music encoded at a bit rate higher than 128, customers would select it without realizing that it would fill up their hard drive and portable player quickly."

Then show the different filesizes for different compression rates. Put up a chart. But when I read that, I see "This is what we have, because people are ignorant about all this, so we save them the trouble of thinking".

GET OUT!

:laugh:

Anyway, this guy is really missing the point here though. Almost all the popular codecs out there are extremely compressed...(mp3, aac, ogg) And of course it isnt perfect quality. The only way you can achieve that is throuhg lossless encoders (FLAC, monkeys audio, apple lossless, etc etc) which also compress them also. The writer of this article is pretty dumb if he doesnt include all the facts. Most normal people CANT tell the difference between a 128kbps AAC versus a 192kbps MP3. :rolleyes:

This is the whole problem with online music services - the quality of the files suck. Pair that with the fact that you don't get a "hard" copy in the form of a CD or the CD liners, inserts, and pamphlets and buying albums off of these music services just doesn't make sense to me.

That depends on how much you value your music. I agree with your point, and I typically purchase the artists that I enjoy, because I want to physically "own" the CD...but when there is muck out like that Milkshake song and crap like that, most popular music has become disposable. Easier to delete a few files than toss the whole CD in the trash in a month or so.

well the reporter who wrote that article has just discovered warm water. Of course they are going to be compressed version of the Cd tracks, who wants to download 100mbs+ per track? "Let me buy this CD, ill just let it download through the day..." Cmon, we all know that we are bound to loose quality as soon as you use a compression method. The New York times should give this guy the "Captian Obvious and his Retard Squad" award.

Who wants to pay for something they could get for free? Nobody is benifiting from the money you spend on iTunes. I can honestly tell the difference between 128kb and 320kb, thats why I ripped my favorite audio tracks at 320kb or raw WAV (15-25mb).

If i'm going to pay for something i can get for free, I had damn well better be getting a better quality version of it. I thought this was the whole point of paying for mp3s! People would say "hmm, I really like this single song, so I'm going to pay to get the real deal".

Well to me it sounds CD quality I burn all my tunes to CD and they sound great? its all personal opinion you cant define CD quality because every CD is recorded different doesnt live music being recorded to CD sound bad? lets all define CD quality as 'good' but then the normal AAC and MP3's sound 'good also' the guy is just sprouting his own personal opinun but is pretending to use his own opinion as everyones.

Remember 70% of newspaper is bull - His just making a news story ;)

Well to me it sounds CD quality I burn all my tunes to CD and they sound great? its all personal opinion you cant define CD quality because every CD is recorded different doesnt live music being recorded to CD sound bad? lets all define CD quality as 'good' but then the normal AAC and MP3's sound 'good also' the guy is just sprouting his own personal opinun but is pretending to use his own opinion as everyones.

Remember 70% of newspaper is bull - His just making a news story ;)

go download a nice bass/range test, 20hz to 20khz is good. And make sure its a high quality one, not a recompressed one. Now recompress it to 128kb, and notice how either the top and bottom ranges are distorted, or you lose no filesize at all.

I guess the CD quality doesn't really matter if you can't tell the difference, but I apparently have sensitive ears, so I can :)

,Jul 5 2004, 20:43] Isn't that based on personal opinion? Or is there an actual in-stone standard of what "CD Quality" is?

No, that's fact. A lossy codec can not encode music at "CD Quality", doesn't matter that encoder (like Lame and others) have presents for. Lossy codec=loss of data. Loss of data=can't be true "cd quality"

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!