iTunes 'not CD-quality'


Recommended Posts

The iPod's low bit-rate has come under fire ? as are Apple claims that iTunes Music Store customers get "true CD audio".

The New York Times advises: "Love the iPod, but don't jump too hastily to fill it with thousands of dollars of iTunes. The tracks are not carbon copies of the CD originals, but compressed versions.

"The smaller files are handy for speedy downloads, space-saving for storage and perfectly serviceable for listening through ear buds when riding on the subway. Not what you will want, however, when your desktop computer becomes the home jukebox and wirelessly sends these simulacra to the entertainment centre in the living room."

In order to create a small file, Apple uses "an extreme form of compression that takes a sample of the sound at intervals," explains the report.

"The bit rate for iTunes, 128, is so low that when played side by side against the original, the difference is audible not only to audio enthusiasts, but also to mortals with ordinary hearing," reporter Randall Stross claims.

See what Apple has to say.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/186749-itunes-not-cd-quality/
Share on other sites

well the reporter who wrote that article has just discovered warm water. Of course they are going to be compressed version of the Cd tracks, who wants to download 100mbs+ per track? "Let me buy this CD, ill just let it download through the day..." Cmon, we all know that we are bound to loose quality as soon as you use a compression method. The New York times should give this guy the "Captian Obvious and his Retard Squad" award.

Did you know the Apple logo is not actually a full Apple? seriously its not !! :woot: ITS GOT A BITE OUT OMFG!! CHECK IT!! and if im not mistaken the leaf on top of the Apple logo PERFECTLY!! fits the bite mark OMFG someone get me a type writer I gotta get this to the people!!!

Did you know the Apple logo is not actually a full Apple? seriously its not !! :woot: ITS GOT A BITE OUT OMFG!! CHECK IT!! and if im not mistaken the leaf on top of the Apple logo PERFECTLY!! fits the bite mark OMFG someone get me a type writer I gotta get this to the people!!!

GET OUT!

Stick to downloading lossless files off usenet or other places

portable audio is never meant to be near as good as home audio, complaining that ipod is compressed is stupid though. I'd rather buy the CD, and rip it to the ipod then BUY their stupid compressed songs, I can compress it myself, and still have the original cd.

I guess for singles, eh, could just download it ;)

"128 provides good sound quality, especially when used in iPods. The majority of people have absolutely no idea what a bit rate is. If Apple offered music encoded at a bit rate higher than 128, customers would select it without realizing that it would fill up their hard drive and portable player quickly."

Then show the different filesizes for different compression rates. Put up a chart. But when I read that, I see "This is what we have, because people are ignorant about all this, so we save them the trouble of thinking".

GET OUT!

:laugh:

Anyway, this guy is really missing the point here though. Almost all the popular codecs out there are extremely compressed...(mp3, aac, ogg) And of course it isnt perfect quality. The only way you can achieve that is throuhg lossless encoders (FLAC, monkeys audio, apple lossless, etc etc) which also compress them also. The writer of this article is pretty dumb if he doesnt include all the facts. Most normal people CANT tell the difference between a 128kbps AAC versus a 192kbps MP3. :rolleyes:

This is the whole problem with online music services - the quality of the files suck. Pair that with the fact that you don't get a "hard" copy in the form of a CD or the CD liners, inserts, and pamphlets and buying albums off of these music services just doesn't make sense to me.

That depends on how much you value your music. I agree with your point, and I typically purchase the artists that I enjoy, because I want to physically "own" the CD...but when there is muck out like that Milkshake song and crap like that, most popular music has become disposable. Easier to delete a few files than toss the whole CD in the trash in a month or so.

well the reporter who wrote that article has just discovered warm water. Of course they are going to be compressed version of the Cd tracks, who wants to download 100mbs+ per track? "Let me buy this CD, ill just let it download through the day..." Cmon, we all know that we are bound to loose quality as soon as you use a compression method. The New York times should give this guy the "Captian Obvious and his Retard Squad" award.

Who wants to pay for something they could get for free? Nobody is benifiting from the money you spend on iTunes. I can honestly tell the difference between 128kb and 320kb, thats why I ripped my favorite audio tracks at 320kb or raw WAV (15-25mb).

If i'm going to pay for something i can get for free, I had damn well better be getting a better quality version of it. I thought this was the whole point of paying for mp3s! People would say "hmm, I really like this single song, so I'm going to pay to get the real deal".

Well to me it sounds CD quality I burn all my tunes to CD and they sound great? its all personal opinion you cant define CD quality because every CD is recorded different doesnt live music being recorded to CD sound bad? lets all define CD quality as 'good' but then the normal AAC and MP3's sound 'good also' the guy is just sprouting his own personal opinun but is pretending to use his own opinion as everyones.

Remember 70% of newspaper is bull - His just making a news story ;)

Well to me it sounds CD quality I burn all my tunes to CD and they sound great? its all personal opinion you cant define CD quality because every CD is recorded different doesnt live music being recorded to CD sound bad? lets all define CD quality as 'good' but then the normal AAC and MP3's sound 'good also' the guy is just sprouting his own personal opinun but is pretending to use his own opinion as everyones.

Remember 70% of newspaper is bull - His just making a news story ;)

go download a nice bass/range test, 20hz to 20khz is good. And make sure its a high quality one, not a recompressed one. Now recompress it to 128kb, and notice how either the top and bottom ranges are distorted, or you lose no filesize at all.

I guess the CD quality doesn't really matter if you can't tell the difference, but I apparently have sensitive ears, so I can :)

,Jul 5 2004, 20:43] Isn't that based on personal opinion? Or is there an actual in-stone standard of what "CD Quality" is?

No, that's fact. A lossy codec can not encode music at "CD Quality", doesn't matter that encoder (like Lame and others) have presents for. Lossy codec=loss of data. Loss of data=can't be true "cd quality"

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Xbox Insiders get Xbox 360 achievements and Gamertag character upgrades by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft is continuing its fast-paced update schedule for Xbox Insiders. Today, the company announced a new slate of features it is rolling out to Xbox Insiders in the Alpha Skip-Ahead ring, which includes an expansion to the gamertag system, Xbox 360 achievements, and more. The unique Gamertag that Xbox users can choose for their profile is getting more characters. Instead of the 12-character limit, Insiders will now be able to get a Gamertag that's 15 characters long. The 12-character limit will still apply to Gamertags that are not unique or contain any non-Latin characters. Meanwhile, Microsoft is adding Xbox 360 game support to its Game Hubs. Selecting an installed Xbox 360 game on a modern Xbox console will now show achievement progress, captures, and other information. Achievement pop-ups are back for these classics too, which should be good news for achievement hunters. The next change is for Xbox players who can't wait to jump into their games when an update is required. "If a game requires an update and is available to stream through your Game Pass membership, you can start playing immediately with cloud gaming while the update downloads in the background," explains Microsoft. The final change of this Insider update is once again to the game cards. Insiders will find that all games, both released and upcoming, will now have a simple button to add to their profile's wishlist, making the process much easier from a single place. This Xbox update is rolling out today to Insiders in the Alpha Skip-Ahead ring. As usual, Microsoft aims to bring it to more Insiders over time before they reach all Xbox owners. Head here to find out how to join the Xbox Insider Program to get a chance to test these features and upcoming ones on both consoles and PC.
    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      467
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!