BET (Black Entertainment Television)


Recommended Posts

Today I was sitting down watching some TV. I was flipping through the channels and i landed on BET. I watched it for a little bit until I saw a screen that flickered the message, "Black Star Power". I was like, WTF.

First of all, isn't having a black only TV station a little discriminatory? Second, whats up with this "Black Star Power" message? How come BET can put this on TV? Lets just think here for a second. What if there was a TV station that was called, WET (White Entertainment Television). They would be hearing, "Thats racist" left and right. Now lets add a white screen flickering the phrase, "White Star Power" and see what happens then. There would be TONS people complaining about it.

I just don't understand. How can BET put this on TV and not hear anything.

P.S. I am not racist at all. I just don't understand this.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/191708-bet-black-entertainment-television/
Share on other sites

I love this channel..

nun wrong with callin it "Black Entertainment Television" its just because it has all Rap n RnB vidoes so its black music basically..

about the black power thing, i unno..

That's really funny...

I almost got in a fight just a couple weeks ago because I referred to someone as being "black"...

I wasn't using it as a derogatory term or anything...

Interesting.

Wow, u must be young. BET has been a staple of the black community for years. I remember watching it when they had only half a day of programming. BET isn't the only African-American television station, and what about the Hispanic and other ethnic television network stations? Remember America home of the free. We are a nation made up of many ethnic backgrounds as one, that's what makes us so great. With so much negativity in the Black community, BET has been an outlet for many. "Black Star Power" is meant to show those who feel that all is lost that there is world for intelligent, positive African-Americans. Only recently has the network begun to stray away from this concept (ti##y, bootie shaking). Oh and by the way, FYI, BET is an subsidiary of Viacom, which in turn owns MTV, MTV2, VH1, Nickelodeon, etc.

Just something for u to chew on. :)

That's really funny...

I almost got in a fight just a couple weeks ago because I referred to someone as being "black"...

I wasn't using it as a derogatory term or anything...

Interesting.

what's funny about it?

-u know, u can just say what u said now without quoting my post..

they have latin tv stations too ya know? its just allowing other cultures to have they space in the media. i mean not to sound like im stereotyping but most if not all tv stations are owned by white america. i do believe that BET is the ONLY cable station that is owned by an african-american. and it caters to the black audience just like latin tv caters to the latin audience. same thing for russian and japanese channels. i can understand that seeing the words "black star power" would make you think its just as racists as having a WET but its not meant to cause an uprising or a to "squash the oppressor." and yeah it would be thought as racist to have white star power but hollywood is driven by white stars as a whole anyway.

edit: i guess is not owned by a black person but the new owner of the charlotte bobcats is definitely the CEO. I thought he owned it but maybe they "sold out to the man" lmao j/k.

edit2: robert johnson founded it and is ceo. he did sell it to viacom a few years back.

Edited by christracy
Wow, u must be young. BET has been a staple of the black community for years. I remember watching it when they had only half a day of programming. BET isn't the only African-American television station, and what about the Hispanic and other ethnic television network stations? Remember America home of the free. We are a nation made up of many ethnic backgrounds as one, that's what makes us so great. With so much negativity in the Black community, BET has been an outlet for many. "Black Star Power" is meant to show those who feel that all is lost that there is world for intelligent, positive African-Americans. Only recently has the network begun to stray away from this concept (ti##y, bootie shaking). Oh and by the way, FYI, BET is an subsidiary of Viacom, which in turn owns MTV, MTV2, VH1, Nickelodeon, etc.

Just something for u to chew on. :)

But think of what would happen if you put White Star Power on a TV station just like i said. People would go apesh!t!!!!!

Remember, Hollywood has been white dominiated for decades now. There's no need to state white star power because it's obvious. Look at the Oscars, Halle Berry got hers for playing a crack ###### while getting dug out by Harry Connick Jr., Denzel got his for being a crooked cop. Before that u had Dorothy Dandridge and Harry Belfonte. Wow 4 over the course for how many years?

Remember, Hollywood has been white dominiated for decades now. There's no need to state white star power because it's obvious. Look at the Oscars, Halle Berry got hers for playing a crack ###### while getting dug out by Harry Connick Jr., Denzel got his for being a crooked cop. Before that u had Dorothy Dandridge and Harry Belfonte. Wow 4 over the course for how many years?

she wasnt a crack ###### nor was it harry connick jr.

she was a single mom with the father on death row being excuted by the man that "dug her out" billy bob thornton.

"Black Star Power" is just there marketing term used to promote their programming (i think their movies in particular). This is not met to be discriminatory or derogatory. BET has programming that appeals to Black Culture. Its not met to put down other races or cultures. And if you actually watched the channel you would know its more than music videos.

Regular programming on NBC or ABC usually does not appeal to black people or people in urban environments, which is why the channel was invented (which btw is owned by Viacom). BET is not met to act as a replacement to "regular" programming, but perhaps as a supplement.

The black power thing ... I think you misinterpreted the message. Most African Americans strive for equality, not separation.

As far as getting in trouble for calling someone "black" .. it all depends who it was used and how it was said. Perhaps you can off wrong and the other person got offended. If you didn't mean it in a offensive way, it might of been easier to say "i didn't mean it in a disrespectful matter as opposed to arguing about it." Wither you were wrong or right, the other person was offended.

most of the shows that cbs, nbc, abc, and fox broadcast are aimed at white males and most of the people on those shows are white males. that is their "white star power" and it's not gonna change. bet has their black oriented programming with black hosts, black acts - their "black star power." it's the same with we and oxygen; their programming is aimed a women. people have to go SOMEWHERE if they want to see something that the broadcast networks won't show.

I'm pretty sure the only group that's not allowed to discriminate is the white male. It's the same thing at school here. We have latin-american clubs (their chant "latino pride" kinda reminds me of "white power"), black clubs, but never anything for white people because hey, white people are just baaaad. :sleep:

I'm pretty sure the only group that's not allowed to discriminate is the white male. It's the same thing at school here. We have latin-american clubs (their chant "latino pride" kinda reminds me of "white power"), black clubs, but never anything for white people because hey, white people are just baaaad. :sleep:

Thats the stuff i'm getting at here. Why is it that if we have a "White Club" that all other races call us racist and discriminatory but they can have their own clubs?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!