Recommended Posts

Somehow I still prefer IE when I am using my XP based PC. On my iBook I use Ff exclusively. (I can't tolerate Safari...good interface but totally unreliable).

I feel when it comes to overall UI, Firefox needs to catch upto IE, sure I can use themes but then it still looks alien on either platform.

Quite the opposite, Microsoft has promoted the use of alternatives although they do stand behind Internet Explorer as any developer would. Seems most of the mud is from the hands of those supporting Mozilla foundation.

Sorry if this comes off harsh, but most of your argument seems more like bellyfeel than anything else.

585410670[/snapback]

Oh, come on. You call that promotion? Promotion is putting a huge ad on your front page saying "Use Firefox!" Not putting the piece of software in a software catalog of Windows stuff. That's like saying Apple promotes the use of Audion over iTunes just because they show it in the OS X Downloads section of their site.

Oh, come on. You call that promotion? Promotion is putting a huge ad on your front page saying "Use Firefox!" Not putting the piece of software in a software catalog of Windows stuff. That's like saying Apple promotes the use of Audion over iTunes just because they show it in the OS X Downloads section of their site.

585411043[/snapback]

Promotional tips to software are just that, no matter how large or small they may be. I was trying to demonstrate to ivand67 that while Microsoft may condone some alternatives they do not relinquish the fact that users have a choice (which in turn is actually a sales point for Windows itself) in the matter contrary to his claim.

ha, that is hardly an excuse to use it.

speed is a moot point when its insecure and does not follow standards.

585411114[/snapback]

I agree. Here is a good security test for IE. Surf a few porn sites and watch what happens to your computer. Your computer will be loaded with BHO's, spyware, adware and viruses. Grant it that porn might not be your cup of tea, but its a good test to see how secure that your browser is. The tactics that porn sites use are the same tactics that everyone uses to fill your computer up with crap, its just that porn sites will do it in a short amount of time and make testing IE's security fairly quick. And yes, Firefox also gets all of the above mentioned crap too, but only about 1/4th as much and the browser will never be hijacked.

I must confess that I sometimes use Firefox for surfing 'dangerous' websites (LOL) , because I don't want anything bad on my computer.

But I can't stand using Firefox for all my internet time, because it feels so heavy and slow compared to IE.

I have anti-spyware, anti-virus, hardware and software firewall, so I feel pretty secure, and I will never ever click 'yes' to those pop-ups and flash animations.

Firefox barely has any 'features' unless you clutter it by installing 10~15 extensions, comepared to some IE add-ons such as Maxthon or Avant, yet IE add-ons comsumes much less memory than Firefox.

And I can't stand the way Firefox rapidly gets slow down when you have more than 5 tabs, I usually have more than 15 tabs on my Maxthon, but I never experienced such lags.

I must confess that I sometimes use Firefox for surfing 'dangerous' websites (LOL) , because I don't want anything bad on my computer.

But I can't stand using Firefox for all my internet time, because it feels so heavy and slow compared to IE.

I have anti-spyware, anti-virus, hardware and software firewall, so I feel pretty secure, and I will never ever click 'yes' to those pop-ups and flash animations.

Firefox barely has any 'features' unless you clutter it by installing 10~15 extensions, comepared to some IE add-ons such as Maxthon or Avant, yet IE add-ons comsumes much less memory than Firefox.

And I can't stand the way Firefox rapidly gets slow down when you have more than 5 tabs, I usually have more than 15 tabs on my Maxthon, but I never experienced such lags.

585411285[/snapback]

If you feel Firefox is heavy, something is wrong. As far as extensions go, I downloaded Flash and Java and that's it. Every site that I visit works fine. I fix computers for a living, so I'm on the internet 15 hours a day (going to different manufacturer websites to order parts, see flash presentations etc) and even I don't need 10~15 extensions. You must do some serious surfing :p . Our central computer will have 15 to 20 tabs open at one time and we don't notice a slow down. I just opened up 12 tabs (on my home computer) and Firefox is running at 35,196K right now for me and there isn't any slow down. After minimizing and then maximizing the windows again, its down to and hovering around 24,345K.

If you feel Firefox is heavy, something is wrong.? As far as extensions go, I downloaded Flash and Java and that's it.? Every site that I visit works fine.? I fix computers for a living, so I'm on the internet 15 hours a day (going to different manufacturer websites to order parts, see flash presentations etc) and even I don't need 10~15 extensions.? You must do some serious surfi:p? :p .? Our central computer will have 15 to 20 tabs open at one time and we don't notice a slow down. I just opened up 12 tabs (on my home computer) and Firefox is running at 35,196K right now for me and there isn't any slow down.? After minimizing and then maximizing the windows again, its down to and hovering around 24,345K.

585411978[/snapback]

If I click the browser icon, I want it to start up right away, not wait for 4~5 seconds to start it up.

And yes, I'm on broadband 3mbps and having more than 5 tabs seriously decrease the speed.

Also, it is true that Firefox needs more than 10 extensions to match functionality of lighter IE add-ons such as Maxthon or Avant.

I'm not the only one who thinks Firefox consumes too much memory.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=277834&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=268607&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=255008&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=220431&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=210316&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=199836&hl=

If I click the browser icon, I want it to start up right away, not wait for 4~5 seconds to start it up.

And yes, I'm on broadband 3mbps and having more than 5 tabs seriously decrease the speed.

Also, it is true that Firefox needs more than 10 extensions to match functionality of lighter IE add-ons such as Maxthon or Avant.

I'm not the only one who thinks Firefox consumes too much memory.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=277834&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=268607&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=255008&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=220431&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=210316&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=199836&hl=

585412018[/snapback]

What broadband are you using? I'm sitting at 100.0 Mbps right now. Firefox uses more memory, true, but not as much on my machine as others (don't know why that is). My Firefox starts and my homepage is loaded in 1.7 seconds (just used a stopwatch to check it). Just did a dsl speed check, http://performance.toast.net/ , it's for toast.net, but it works for any dsl connection and my Yahoo DSL connection is off the board. I have been using Firebird/Firefox since it's inception and have never needed that many extensions. If your machine is newer, it doesn't matter how much memory a program uses, it won't slow it down so much that you notice it.

If I click the browser icon, I want it to start up right away, not wait for 4~5 seconds to start it up.

And yes, I'm on broadband 3mbps and having more than 5 tabs seriously decrease the speed.

Also, it is true that Firefox needs more than 10 extensions to match functionality of lighter IE add-ons such as Maxthon or Avant.

I'm not the only one who thinks Firefox consumes too much memory.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=277834&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=268607&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=255008&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=220431&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=210316&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=199836&hl=

585412018[/snapback]

Do this for a faster startup: Right click the Firefox icon that you use to start it. Click properties, shortcut and in the "target" window add /prefetch:1. Make sure that there is a space between "C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe" and /prefetch:1 (leave the quotes) so it looks like this, "C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe" /prefetch:1. That will help Firefox start up faster.

I must confess that I sometimes use Firefox for surfing 'dangerous' websites (LOL) , because I don't want anything bad on my computer.

But I can't stand using Firefox for all my internet time, because it feels so heavy and slow compared to IE.

I have anti-spyware, anti-virus, hardware and software firewall, so I feel pretty secure, and I will never ever click 'yes' to those pop-ups and flash animations.

Firefox barely has any 'features' unless you clutter it by installing 10~15 extensions, comepared to some IE add-ons such as Maxthon or Avant, yet IE add-ons comsumes much less memory than Firefox.

And I can't stand the way Firefox rapidly gets slow down when you have more than 5 tabs, I usually have more than 15 tabs on my Maxthon, but I never experienced such lags.

585411285[/snapback]

erm

"

Firefox barely has any 'features' unless you clutter it by installing 10~15 extensions, comepared to some IE add-ons such as Maxthon or Avant, yet IE add-ons comsumes much less memory than Firefox."

errm, avant is a differend browser not a add on, it uses the ie engine, like firefox uses the ghecko engine, only firefox includes that engine, avant doesnt cause ie is allready on everyones machine

get it straight

If I click the browser icon, I want it to start up right away, not wait for 4~5 seconds to start it up.

Hmm... On my PC IE takes ~0.5s to launch. Firefox ~1.0s. Guess you have a pretty old PC? The prefetch option will work well on XP...

Perhaps you'd like Firefox to remain resident so that it loads faster? That's what the OS does for IE... Adobe decided they had to do that with Acrobat Reader 7 to alleviate slow performance in 6...

erm

"

Firefox barely has any 'features' unless you clutter it by installing 10~15 extensions, comepared to some IE add-ons such as Maxthon or Avant, yet IE add-ons comsumes much less memory than Firefox."

errm, avant is a differend browser not a add on, it uses the ie engine, like firefox uses the ghecko engine, only firefox includes that engine, avant doesnt cause ie is allready on everyones machine

get it straight

585412135[/snapback]

The reason why I called Avant or Maxthon 'IE add-on' is because IE core is running in Windows all the time, even when you're not browsing with it.

Which is part of reasons why they start up much faster than Firefox.

And thanks todbran, I'll try them later.

lol when will people realize the W3C standards are RECOMMENDATIONS, meaning no one HAS to follow them. Also no browser avalible today is 100% compliant to every version of the W3C's HTML related standards...

585410527[/snapback]

Quite correct, the "de facto standard" IS IE because 90% of users use it!! For those of you who do not understand what that means, here is the definition:

De facto standards

A de facto standard, for instance, is a technical or other standard that is so dominant that everybody seems to follow it like an authorized standard. The de jure standard may be different: one example is the metric unit of kilometre, which is the de jure standard for road distances in the United States, while the mile (=1609.344 m) is the de facto standard.

A de facto standard is sometimes not formalized and may simply rely on the fact that someone has come up with a good idea that is liked so much that it is copied. Typical creators of de facto standards are individual companies, corporations and consortia.

Another example of a de facto standard, is where a product that does not follow de jure rules gains market superiority. Microsoft's Internet Explorer does not support de jure W3C Web Standards, but because of its market dominance web pages are often designed with Internet Explorer's de-facto interpretation in mind.

Well now there you go.....

The point of this thread is, apparently, to "prove" that IE is faster than Firefox...

the problem being - that test is not a shear test of connection speed.

The test relies massively upon Javascript to obtain its results.

What does it prove? Simply that IE executes that particular javascript a bit faster than javascript. Not that "IE is faster than Firefox" (it is not).

The point of this thread is, apparently, to "prove" that IE is faster than Firefox...

the problem being - that test is not a shear test of connection speed.

The test relies massively upon Javascript to obtain its results.

What does it prove? Simply that IE executes that particular javascript a bit faster than javascript. Not that "IE is faster than Firefox" (it is not).

585467981[/snapback]

Ok. You don't believe that.

How about this? http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

This site shows IE as being faster than firefox.

  • 2 weeks later...

How come when I move a window over a firefox window, then move it around, it either trails or lags. But it doesn't do that in internet explorer. My firefox is untouched, and it's slow. Why? Why is it slow? I thought firefox is supposed to be the best browser ever, but it's not. Why not?

How come when I move a window over a firefox window, then move it around, it either trails or lags. But it doesn't do that in internet explorer. My firefox is untouched, and it's slow. Why? Why is it slow? I thought firefox is supposed to be the best browser ever, but it's not. Why not?

585531883[/snapback]

Well it can't be the best for everyone. Everyone guages "the best" and "better" on different things. I'm sure you're in the minority that marks a browser's performance and useability on moving a window around on top of it.

Plainly put, IE in Windows will work faster than anything because Explorer is the engine used for rendering the Windows Desktop. Of course, if you install Netscape and their little systray quickstart thingy, then its just as fast, but who uses netscape now? Is it even W3C compliant? ;)

Plainly put, IE in Windows will work faster than anything because Explorer is the engine used for rendering the Windows Desktop. Of course, if you install Netscape and their little systray quickstart thingy, then its just as fast, but who uses netscape now? Is it even W3C compliant? ;)

585531941[/snapback]

opera is FASTERthan all of them

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!