Recommended Posts

IE

Throughput

45820 Bps

bytes per second

Throughput

367 kbps

kilobits per second

Firefox

Throughput

45703 Bps

bytes per second

Throughput

366 kbps

kilobits per second

:no:

meh...they are about the same IMO (as far as speed). If there is any speed difference...it isn't much to create a fuss over.

I just prefer Firefox...because...I just do!. :) (nothing against IE)

Frankly...all these IE vs. Firefox vs. Opera vs. Netscape vs. Mozilla vs. WorldWideWeb vs. libwww vs. ViolaWWW vs. Erwise vs. Line-mode vs. Midas vs. Arena vs. Mosaic vs. Samba (macintosh web browser) vs. Lynx vs. Cello vs. Navipress vs. Active Worlds vs. Air_Mosaic vs. Amiga vs. etc. etc. etc.....

gets very old.

Sort of like the Windows vs. Linux vs. Apple vs. Solaris vs. etc. etc.

:)

Is that a microsoft powered site??

It took me double time to load on IE the site than on firefox thought the messure shows that IE is faster. Anyway i dun care about the benchmarks since i can notice the difference on speed of firefox and IE. FireFox :yes:

Geez why can you IE fanboys just not accept that Firefox is better than IE in almost every concieveable way.

I am not a firefox fanboy but lets look at the facts. The last IE release was so long ago I cant even remember. You cant fix all of its bugs in a few service packs it needs an overhaul. Firefox is newer than IE, they have learned from IE's mistakes and built a new, better browser. Think about it, if IE is so great, powerfull and the best browser around, then why have MS done a complete 180 on their plans and decided to make a new version? They can see that they are loosing market share because their browser is so dated and full of holes.

Also, when a bug is found, Firefox have an update within hours. The same cant be said for MS. There are so many vunerabilities with it I dont know where to start. If you knew just how easy IE is to be comprimised you wouldnt use it.

Like I said, I am not a Firefox fanboy, just that after looking into it, looking at the facts, FF became my browser of choice. I never usually get involved with these kind of arguments, It just aggrivates me to see IE fanboys using the same excuses as the last dying arguments for their sinking browser.

Frankly...all these IE vs. Firefox vs. Opera vs. Netscape vs. Mozilla vs. WorldWideWeb vs. libwww vs. ViolaWWW vs. Erwise vs. Line-mode vs. Midas vs. Arena vs. Mosaic vs. Samba (macintosh web browser) vs. Lynx vs. Cello vs. Navipress vs. Active Worlds vs. Air_Mosaic vs. Amiga vs. etc. etc. etc.....

585532224[/snapback]

Safari is the Mac OS X web browser. Samba (SMB) is a cross-platform file browsing protocol, yet used mainly in Windows. :p

To randomnut: very well put I must say, except that you failed to mention speed issue, which is main topic in this thread. :rolleyes:

And I like how you generalize all IE users in this thread as "fanboys", and yet you manage to convince people that you're not a fanboy yourself, LOL.

Geez why can you IE fanboys just not accept that Firefox is better than IE in almost every concieveable way.

I am not a firefox fanboy but lets look at the facts.  The last IE release was so long ago I cant even remember.  You cant fix all of its bugs in a few service packs it needs an overhaul.  Firefox is newer than IE, they have learned from IE's mistakes and built a new, better browser.    Think about it, if IE is so great, powerfull and the best browser around, then why have MS done a complete 180 on their plans and decided to make a new version?  They can see that they are loosing market share because their browser is so dated and full of holes.

Also, when a bug is found, Firefox have an update within hours.  The same cant be said for MS.  There are so many vunerabilities with it I dont know where to start.  If you knew just how easy IE is to be comprimised you wouldnt use it.

Like I said, I am not a Firefox fanboy, just that after looking into it, looking at the facts, FF became my browser of choice.  I never usually get involved with these kind of arguments, It just aggrivates me to see IE fanboys using the same excuses as the last dying arguments for their sinking browser.

585532266[/snapback]

Your whole post was full of ****, but I'm going to just analyze one point:

"Also, when a bug is found, Firefox have an update within hours."

Is that right? First of all, no. Sometimes there is an update fast, but usually it takes a bit for it to be fixed internally. Once its fixed internally, it may make it to the nightlies. But nightlies should NOT be used to update to new fixes. Why? Because nightlies are untested.

So if nightlies aren't to be used, where are the updates? Oh yeah, 1.01 was finally released 3 1/2 months later. But guess what? It's security fixes only! Want rendering bugs or other bugs fixed? Wait until summer when 1.1 is supposed to be released. Sure you can use a nightly, if you don't mind the risk of it not even working at all, crashing, destroying your computer,...

Safari is the Mac OS X web browser. Samba (SMB) is a cross-platform file browsing protocol, yet used mainly in Windows. :p

585532275[/snapback]

Samba (aka MacWWW or maybe it was aka Samba?) was a web browser developed in 1992 by Robert Cailliau for the Macintosh platform.

:p

Your whole post was full of ****, but I'm going to just analyze one point:

"Also, when a bug is found, Firefox have an update within hours."

Is that right?  First of all, no.  Sometimes there is an update fast, but usually it takes a bit for it to be fixed internally.  Once its fixed internally, it may make it to the nightlies.  But nightlies should NOT be used to update to new fixes.  Why?  Because nightlies are untested.

So if nightlies aren't to be used, where are the updates?  Oh yeah, 1.01 was finally released 3 1/2 months later.  But guess what?  It's security fixes only!  Want rendering bugs or other bugs fixed?  Wait until summer when 1.1 is supposed to be released.  Sure you can use a nightly, if you don't mind the risk of it not even working at all, crashing, destroying your computer,...

585532293[/snapback]

And thats not better than waiting a year for MS to get off their asses? :p

Oh, you fanboys make me laugh. Just accept it.

We need a new forum category where these kind of threads end up in, something like Nuclear Wastes, Neowin Junkyard, or the likes... It even has flames about communism now. Wow. I think this thread managed to race beyond Godwin's Law without even speaking of nazi's. :)

I also observe the FWF (Fanboy Word Frequency) is high in this thread, and can only conclude it's the favorite word among flamers.

Edited by Jugalator
i had firefox for 5 minutes. Tried it out, hated it, uninstalled it within 5 minutes and used IE :D

585532432[/snapback]

funny...I used it for 5 minutes...didn't really like it. Left it on...went back to it every now and then...started liking it more...

eventually I went all the way over...made it my default browser.

Oh well...guess some of us don't judge to quick. :whistle:

Oh well...guess some of us don't judge to quick.

Exactly! :D

I was also sceptical in the beginning. Now i use firefox because sites generally doesnt bug up for me. On IE it sometimes sais "errors in page" but with no reason. A refresh fixed it but thats just one of a list of irritating things.

I have now installed Opera as well and i'm experimenting a bit with it. So far i still like Firefox over Opera because Opera just makes things more difficult than they should be. When they make the interface better i might try it permanently for some days or maybe weeks. Right now i still stick with Firefox because i don't feel there is anything better out (yet)

And thats not better than waiting a year for MS to get off their asses? :p

Oh, you fanboys make me laugh.  Just accept it.

585532380[/snapback]

Of course not. But your statements were misleading..

BTW, I don't use IE ;) My browser (Opera) has security fixes out very fast (7.54u1 and u2).

Samba (aka MacWWW or maybe it was aka Samba?) was a web browser developed in 1992 by Robert Cailliau for the Macintosh platform.

:p

585532312[/snapback]

Ah, I thought we were talking about semi-modern web browsers here. :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!