Recommended Posts

looks great could we have one with a system task bar at the top instead of the side as in the original longhorn 4074...what colour was it? sorta transition to mauve or red in the my documents folder :)

sorta like this

http://www.only4gurus.com/v2/longhorn/page...051_072_jpg.asp

or this

http://www.winsupersite.com/images/showcase/4074_ui_05.gif

thanks keep up the good work by the way!

I don't think double panel at the same side will look good. I make top panel because Aero Slate use gradient style.

Hey I've seen a theme very like that, though it looks like you've really borked it up, did you mod someone elses theme?

I ported this theme myself from WinHEC screenshots for long time ago (About 7 days after shot leaked) but not as this one due to my skinning experiences and old resources. If you mean KoL's work, he ported from the same sources but look different from me if you check it carefully. Each resource is totally different.

post-34-1091391922.jpg

I don't think it will look similar to stefanka's work too. If you mean toolbarbackground, he recaptured it from screenshots too as I but my curve looks different with more accurate for Longhorn work and different patterns. If you notice, KoL and stefanka uses the same captionbar button style but they ported from the same source anyway.

post-34-1091392558.jpg

Yeh but the reason why they've changed it is because it doesn't look very good having a large lighter blue colour over two toolbars. Having it too accurate, when it's hard to port the other features, doesn't always work. But that's JUST a difference of opinion...

I would choose none, sorry, but please stop those bad Longhorn Imitations...you think they are cool? NO! You think you can make Longhorn look good by adding your own graphics? NO! why do you always make the titlebar thicker than it already is? And why are you always using wrong captionbuttons or making them look like they are split up?!? If you are going for the Longhorn look, then please do it right! And after KoL's port there is really no need more for more Longhorn themes! We have every style from Longhorn in so many variations, you just can't think your work looks good compared to the ones we have now!! Also, just because you think you were born to make Longhorn themes doesn't mean you have to show us "concepts" of new ideas every day...please stop it!!!!!

I too, wonder why you still try to make Longhorn themes. I mean is it that hard to wait till what Aero actually looks like rather than making ports of a alpha release purely just to act as a placeholder for the new graphics. I mean each leaked build, you seem to make a port of it, and honestly, its hardly anything like what it looks like. So why don't you just wait until Microsoft employees actually come up with the REAL aero.

Also one thing I don't understand is why you keep naming your work after Microsoft's work. Longhorn, Aero, Jade, etc etc. I mean you didn't actually make them, you just copied their graphics and style and then put it in a Windows XP theme and released it and claimed it as your own.

I would choose none, sorry, but please stop those bad Longhorn Imitations...you think they are cool? NO! You think you can make Longhorn look good by adding your own graphics? NO! why do you always make the titlebar thicker than it already is? And why are you always using wrong captionbuttons or making them look like they are split up?!? If you are going for the Longhorn look, then please do it right! And after KoL's port there is really no need more for more Longhorn themes! We have every style from Longhorn in so many variations, you just can't think your work looks good compared to the ones we have now!! Also, just because you think you were born to make Longhorn themes doesn't mean you have to show us "concepts" of new ideas every day...please stop it!!!!!

I did it before KoL and that's my variation. I use big captionbar text because Aero did from screenshots. I use another captionbar because I don't want to make my themes look crippled with fake background trick. I wonder why everyone who make their own work and post it here ged positive feedback and everything I posted will turn to moron war. For name, you must blame ike too because he named it as Microsoft's name too. Grow up, dude. I can make exactly port easily but I just don't want to make in its way you like as Longhorn nuts being.

Yet all graphics I've used are what from Longhorn without remaking or modification at all. Perhaps you just wanna get me down with reasonless post.

I would choose none, sorry, but please stop those bad Longhorn Imitations...you think they are cool? NO! You think you can make Longhorn look good by adding your own graphics? NO! why do you always make the titlebar thicker than it already is? And why are you always using wrong captionbuttons or making them look like they are split up?!? If you are going for the Longhorn look, then please do it right! And after KoL's port there is really no need more for more Longhorn themes! We have every style from Longhorn in so many variations, you just can't think your work looks good compared to the ones we have now!! Also, just because you think you were born to make Longhorn themes doesn't mean you have to show us "concepts" of new ideas every day...please stop it!!!!!

Although Im not Longhorn crazy, I dont think that your comments serve any purpose whatsoever apart from annoying everyone else.

Everyone's entitled to do their own mods.

So if you dont like it, get out and stop trolling.

@Windows X

Its looking good so far, Id like to see you do some more with the captionbuttons and scrollarrows.

You say you are making these right now? That's great, but they have already been done. Just have a look. Now if you could make a theme that looked like that Photoshop-only project, that would be freakin' sweet!

you should have like three different cariations of the theme for specific wallpapers and overlay them on the taskbar in the theme (if that would even work) giving theillusion of a transparent taskbar.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Zed 1.7.2 has landed with updated OpenCode models, bug fixes and other improvements by David Uzondu Zed 1.7.2 recently landed on the stable release channel, bringing a host of AI-related features including automatic context compaction and settings-based skill management, along with other things like better Markdown preview rendering and custom git commands in the graph view. Starting with the AI stuff, the developers introduced "/compact", a command that basically summarizes your conversation history on demand. This tool prevents your active chat window from hitting token limits by compressing older parts of the dialogue into a brief overview. In addition to that, the team relocated skill management to the settings UI, improving how the application communicates errors regarding those skills, and updated the OpenCode model roster to support DeepSeek V4 Flash, MiniMax M3, Qwen 3.7 Plus, and Nemotron 3 Ultra Free. External agent users can also monitor context window cost metrics and delete individual sessions directly from their history. Right-clicking ref labels in the git graph now opens a context menu that runs different actions against selected targets, kind of how VS Code does it. Here are some of the bug fixes this new release brings: The active agent fails to auto-select when creating a new git worktree. A scrollbar unexpectedly appears on wrapped code blocks in the agent chat. Collapse indicators for project headers appear when performing sidebar searches. Bracketed ellipsis title prefixes fail to show the ellipsis icon properly. Project icons render incorrectly in the recent projects picker. Diff hunk controls appear inside non-editable commit view multibuffers. The software update button hangs indefinitely on the downloading stage. Restoring an agent terminal in a remote project triggers a sudden crash. Splitting a pane that contains an active commit view causes a crash. Linux Wayland freezes when trying to read the clipboard from laggy external apps. Zed is a "newish" code editor trying to break the massive stronghold VS Code has on the developer community. Funny enough, the editor was created by former GitHub employees who worked on the Atom text editor (which Microsoft killed in 2022, several years after it bought GitHub). The project officially hit version 1.0 back in April, introducing platform parity for Windows and Linux alongside deep support for DeepSeek-V4-Pro.
    • 26H2 absolutely will support ARM Windows just not on devices that came with 26H1. This is evident by the fact I am running 26H2, which on my MacBook Neo and Surface Pro 12 (inch), within a VM.
    • Mp3tag 3.35 by Razvan Serea Mp3tag is a powerful and yet easy-to-use tool to edit metadata (ID3, Vorbis Comments and APE) of common audio formats. It can rename files based on the tag information, replace characters or words from tags and filenames, import/export tag information, create playlists and more. The program supports online freedb database lookups for selected files, allowing you to automatically gather proper tag information for select files or CDs. Mp3tag supports the following audio formats: Advanced Audio Coding (aac) Free Lossless Audio Codec (flac) Monkeys Audio (ape) Mpeg Layer 3 (mp3) MPEG-4 (mp4 / m4a / m4b / iTunes compatible) Musepack (mpc) Ogg Vorbis (ogg) OptimFROG (ofr) OptimFROG DualStream (ofs) Speex (spx) Toms Audio Kompressor (tak) True Audio (tta) Windows Media Audio (wma) WavPack (wv) Mp3tag 3.35 changelog: This version introduces a new Files options page, enhanced toolbar customization, support for RF64 WAV files, improved Discogs and MusicBrainz tag sources, and many other improvements and fixes. See the Release Notes for more details. Download: Mp3tag 64-bit | 5.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Mp3tag 32-bit | 5.2 MB Link: Mp3tag Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The FIFA World Cup is not US centric.
    • It’s amusing how Microsoft is pushing IT admins as if this was a major, game-changing update. In reality, it’s just an enablement package that bumps the build number, which is disappointing compared to the more substantial 22H2 and 24H2 releases. Technically, 25H2, 26H1, and the upcoming 26H2 are essentially the same, differing only in support schedules. They could have included the Windows K2 improvements here, but chose not to. The era of Windows being in the backburner continues, and this 26H2 release feels like an afterthought. Shame, Nadella, shame.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!