• 0

easy WYSIWYG html editor?


Question

21 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I am going to de-recormend NetObjects, I personally think it is one of the worst HTML editors I have ever seen. You can't go wrong with Dreamweaver, Namo Web Editor or even FrontPage.

  • 0

Enhanced HTML 2002 The best WYSWYG there is around.

Full WYSWYG interface for quick and painless editing of your web pages

Built in FTP program to load your site onto the net.

Spell Checker and HTML reference

Use it in place of notepad too!

Programmer? Here's the text editor you have been waiting for.

http://www.ehtml.com/

  • 0

I've used Mozilla Composer, but I'm more of a straight-to-the-code kind of guy. I use Vim. [vim.org]

However, if you truly need a WYSIWYG editor then I recommend Dreamweaver MX 2004. [macromedia.com] The web guys at our firm use it with some degree of success, and they don't have very many complaints.

By the way, we develop internally for Gecko (the Mozilla browser and Mozilla Firefox rendering engine), and Dreamweaver MX 2004 supposedly makes this very easy with standards compliance right out-of-the-box. Of course, that's just what the web guys tell me.

  • 0

A lot of people have suggested Dreamweaver, but personally I dont like it that much. Its good in some aspects, like the half html half wysiwyg window, but I find the program annoying in other areas. Like how it will it auto resize tables on you without even you knowing until its too late and your whole layout is shot T_T.... thats why I went back to notepad.

  • 0
  norky said:
who cares if it has bloated code?  iit's not written for performance like a browser or something

Well, there are many of us out there who don't want to write bloated, proprietary microsoft type code. Front Page 2003 was altered because of the massive outcry from developers who said they did not want it either. Microsoft listened and Front Page 2003 as a result produces much cleaner code. Happy ending, all the way around. :)

If you have lots of visitors and use up lots of bandwidth, the cleaner and more efficient the code, the less you will have to pay for bandwidth.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • OpenAI slashes o3 price by 80% in direct challenge to Gemini 2.5 Pro by Pradeep Viswanathan Back in April, OpenAI released o3, its flagship reasoning model, which delivered state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on several AI benchmarks, including Codeforces, SWE-bench, and MMMU. The o3 model also included support for external tools, such as web browsing, a Python interpreter, and more. Although o3 was the most powerful model available from OpenAI, it was not widely adopted by developers due to its pricing compared to other alternatives. Google’s Gemini 2.5 Pro model offered nearly the same performance at one-quarter of the cost, while Anthropic’s Claude 3.7 models delivered better coding performance at a similar price. Today, OpenAI is responding to developer feedback by reducing the price of the o3 model by nearly 80%. At launch, the o3 model was priced at $10 per million input tokens and $40 per million output tokens. As of today, OpenAI is lowering the price to $2 per million input tokens and $8 per million output tokens. This price drop makes o3 a much more attractive option for developers. You can refer to the benchmark comparison table below, which Google published last week during the launch of the Gemini 2.5 Pro June update, to see how OpenAI’s o3 compares with other leading models. In addition to the price reduction, OpenAI is also launching o3 Pro, its new flagship reasoning model, later today. The o3 Pro model is expected to outperform the Gemini 2.5 Pro June update on several key AI benchmarks and may be priced at $10 per million input tokens and $40 per million output tokens.
    • From my understanding.... Thunderbolt isn't like USB ... where you can simply plug a couple of TB ports into the header.  The header itself isn't "Thunderbolt" ... the header connects to the add-on Thunderbolt I/O card for management. I'm sure Nik can better articulate...   ...helpful as always...
    • That said, it might be living somewhat dangerously to blindly rename existing *.BAT files to *.CMD, due to differences in ERRORLEVEL handling between the two extensions. See https://ss64.com/nt/errorlevel.html . For new scripts intended only for recent Windows versions, yes, using .CMD is a good idea.
    • And even if you think someone is an idiot, that doesn't mean they can't tell the truth. But I suppose people like BadBot don't care, it wouldn't be the first time he acted like that.
    • Because it was generated with AI (which you have to disclose), it means that you cannot copyright it (only humans get copyright). Which anyone who wants to can just steal your work for whatever reason they want, even selling the same thing on the same site, in China, etc. In short, the user will quickly learn why copyrights exist in the law to protect authors from having their work stolen. So, think about using this despicable pile of AI slop shop as a learning experience.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Alan- earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      IAMFLUXX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Æhund earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      CoolRaoul earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Kurotama earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      526
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      276
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      216
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      206
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      140
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!