style xp vs. windowsblinds


Recommended Posts

i dont know which one to use and i was wondering which one has more styles for it and which one is more or less complictad, also which one takes up more RAM.

On this board, a lot of people prefer MSStyles. It's really a personal preference. Some people don't like running an additional skinning program on top of XP. But, some people claim Windowblinds is faster than Windows XP internal theming system (i.e. Running Windowblinds and shutting off the Theme Service). You should try both and see which one you prefer. I would probably try MSStyles first since it would require very minimal changes to your system.

On this board, a lot of people prefer MSStyles. It's really a personal preference. Some people don't like running an additional skinning program on top of XP. But, some people claim Windowblinds is faster than Windows XP internal theming system (i.e. Running Windowblinds and shutting off the Theme Service). You should try both and see which one you prefer. I would probably try MSStyles first since it would require very minimal changes to your system.

Wrong. to use an alternate msstyle you have to PATCH a system file. With windowblinds you dont do anything.

WRONG, it takes infact far less memory :angry:

You don't get the BS service pack issues with it, it's far more advanced and takes even less CPU!

WRONG. It all depends on the theme you use. A theme with heavy animation and such will use both more RAM and CPU cycles.

On this board, a lot of people prefer MSStyles.  It's really a personal preference.  Some people don't like running an additional skinning program on top of XP.  But, some people claim Windowblinds is faster than Windows XP internal theming system (i.e. Running Windowblinds and shutting off the Theme Service).  You should try both and see which one you prefer.  I would probably try MSStyles first since it would require very minimal changes to your system.

Wrong. to use an alternate msstyle you have to PATCH a system file. With windowblinds you dont do anything.

You are both WRONG. Visual Styles require you to patch your Uxtheme.dll system file, while WindowsBlinds requires you to install a program, and to turn off the Windows default theming service if you want it to run faster. Also, WindowsBlinds hooks the Appearance tab of the Display Properties dialog box, which can be frustrating at times. With Visual Styles, all you need to do is to patch your Uxtheme.dll file. There are no installation programs and additional programs to run in the Tray.

Edited by A.K.R.
WRONG, it takes infact far less memory  :angry:

You don't get the BS service pack issues with it, it's far more advanced and takes even less CPU!

Wrong.  :angry:  :no:

WB takes less memory.

icecaveman, you are only half - right.

XanDaMan, you are completely wrong.

Yes, with WindowsBlinds, you do not need to care about what service pack you use. However, WindowsBlinds is a resource hog - unless you turn off the default theming service. And it can be quite a hassle for newbies to turn off a "service".

WRONG. It all depends on the theme you use. A theme with heavy animation and such will use both more RAM and CPU cycles.

This is another contributing factor to the amount of resources any Windows Themes (Visual Styles, WindowsBlinds) can use. For example, a theme that is rather large will hog more system resources, compared to smaller and simpler ones. Visual Styles suffer from this problem too, but the problem is usually felt the most in WindowsBlinds, because of the extra features it provides (sound effects, toolbar skinning, progress animations, animations in elements of the interface itself, and much more).

Edited by A.K.R.

I used to use windowblinds - and loved it, until I found the styles here. Visual styles are generally much better (according to me, at least) in comparison to windowblinds skins... see for yourself!

Windowblinds skins tend to be bloated because people think that they NEED to use all the skinning capabilities of skinstudio. Visual styles artists tend to make minimalistic, yet very attractive styles (most cannot be perfectly turned into windowblinds skins)...

I would just hack uxtheme.dll - it's not as though something horrible will happen to your computer... and it really won't that slowly (same as current...)

both are pretty gentle on system resource imo. what should matter is the skins. there are more visual styles available than windowblinds skins (arguable but the good ones are always available in visual style). some people will also argue you can import visual style into skin studio and convert, but the result is not perfect and why not just use visual styles.

right now i'm using windowblinds for the 0px border (can't do it w/o messing up some dialogs with visual styles). i'm a bit annoyed that matlab isn't skinned by windowblinds but it is by visual styles.

It really depends on your personal preference. It's a complicated and controversial "battle" of sorts. I have a lot of things to do right now, and I don't have time to post some long - winded message right now, but I suggest that, if you do not have the money and experince, get Visual Styles.

I am not wrong A.K.R. Talk to frogboy about it yourself. To use a msstyle you have to patch a system file [the uxtheme]. Windowblinds does not touch any system files and is easyier to Install. Wb's Useage varys on how well the skin was put together, and even with the theme service enabled, Windowblinds CAN still be faster.

EDIT : And btw, if you actually read any documentation, about the apearance tab, Hold Ctrl when u right click on desktop properties. I for one don't see how this is "frustrating". I have purchased Windowblinds, but i still use msstyles the most.

Edited by Reble

Visual Style is a generic term guys...

With Visual Styles, all you need to do is to patch your Uxtheme.dll file. There are no installation programs and additional programs to run in the Tray.

Then just set the option to have WB not run in the tray :rolleyes:

Both skinning engines require a program that runs, Windowblinds just doesn't hide it's exe behind a generic system process.

I just use window blinds with the xp theme service turned off. Most of the themes I use take around 700k ish of memory and it doesn't slow my computer down.

* I wish someone would pin one of these threads so that a new one doesn't appear every couple of weeks *

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!