Recommended Posts

Okay, I'm gonna get a new distro, but before I choose, which package of X11 should I use, XFree86 or Xorg? What are the pros and cons of each one?

There are very little technical differences.

X.org is favoured for political reasons because XFree86 changed to a GPL incompatible license when they went to XFree86 4.4

XFree86 4.3 does not have the licensing issues, it is well supported by drivers and it considered to be stable.

X.org is based on XFree86 4.4 but is also free of licensing issues. It has improved screen fonts and better alpha transparencies. You may, however, have issues when you go to add such things as video drivers.

Some distros, like those based on Debian, plan to wait for the modular edition of X.org before they port their system onto it. Their reasoning is that there is too little benefit to justify a move to X.org until then. The current release of X.org is little more than XFree86 4.4 repacked under the X.org banner (albeit with a GPL compatiblelicense).

The general consensus, however, is that XFree86 is dead (in the long term).

I should also mention that X.org 6.8 (their repackaged version of XFree86 4.4 with a few extras) was supposed to ship on Wednesday, August 25th, 2004 but it looks like their release date has slipped.

There is probably little point in upgrading to X.org 6.7 at this point although I don't really know if they are getting even close to releasing 6.8. The chart that I saw on their website (which I don't know if it is up to date) showed a lot of red boxes in the unfinished category.

I heard that some distros, like SuSE 10 are waiting for X.org to release 6.8 before they launch so they pressure is on...

x.org - it's more stable, and constantly improving (something not true for XFree86 anymore).

I think some background info might be helpful:

X.org is approved by the Open Group, an entity governing the X11 standard. XFree86 was a usable reference-implementation of the UNIX-wide X standard. But X changed the license from MIT-X11 to something GPL-incompatible before 4.4 was released. One of the main X guru's, Keith Packard, left the XFree86 team some months ago, before the license change, and started fd.o XServer, an experimental, now defunct, X11 implementation to test new features. After the license change, the last XFree86 version before the change was forked, and approved as the new, official X11 reference-implementation by the Open Group, and hosted at freedesktop.org. Keith gave up XServer and ported his improvements to X.org. A lot of the other XFree86 core developers, fed up with XFree86's license change and lack of flexibility, joined the X.org team (Egbert Eich, Alan Coopersmith, Jim Gettys, Eric Anholt...). The first X.org release was 6.7, basically XFree86 with some bugfixes - the soon to be released 6.8 contains quite a few performance and eye-candy improvements like XDamage, XFixes and Compose, and future releases might even implement parts of Looking Glass and similar features. BTW, drivers are not really an issue, even Andy Ritger of Nvidia is a regular on the X.org mailinglist... ;-)

It's been said before, but I want to add my own 2?.

X.org is going to be the future of the X11 window system. Since it is a fork of the XFree 4.3 tree, it's tried and tested and as stable as XFree 4.3 ever was (with the same driver support). The advantage of X.org is that it is and will continue to be a GPL-compatible license, and, it has a better development schedule. X.org is planning on implementing a lot of features that users have been wanting. XFree is too slow with integrating new features, patches, and upgrades. And their development is a lot more restricted in that fewer people are allowed to commit directly to the tree versus a normal OSS project. X.org has opened up a lot more and is allowing more community contribution. Which is always a Good Thing.

It's been said before, but I want to add my own 2?.

X.org is going to be the future of the X11 window system. Since it is a fork of the XFree 4.3 tree, it's tried and tested and as stable as XFree 4.3 ever was (with the same driver support). The advantage of X.org is that it is and will continue to be a GPL-compatible license, and, it has a better development schedule. X.org is planning on implementing a lot of features that users have been wanting. XFree is too slow with integrating new features, patches, and upgrades. And their development is a lot more restricted in that fewer people are allowed to commit directly to the tree versus a normal OSS project. X.org has opened up a lot more and is allowing more community contribution. Which is always a Good Thing.

Actually it was forked at XFree 4.4RC2.

ATI does not provide driver support for XFree4.4 or X.org just XFree 4.3

I think that just about eveyone believes that XFree86 is dead. The decision is whether we should wait until X.org offers something more concrete (like their modular version).

Nobody doubts the future, just the present...

Xorg was meant to replace XFree86 as the license was reently chnged.

Many distributions already have Xorg packages (Fedora installs it by default now). And Debian gives you an option which to install.

I think Xorg is fully compatible with XFree86.

Fedora installs a hybrid version of the two. Its not one nor the other.

Xorg should be your choice, most users would agree.

  • 2 weeks later...
X.org for the speed at which it is developed

x.org will be the X11 system that we all use two years from now but there are little advantages in swiching now. xFree86 is effectively dead as far as the future is concerned but in the present, it matters little.

x.org may be progressing quickly but there were late with their 6.8 release.

I recomend using xorg over xfree86 for a few reasons. First off is that while they did miss their release date by almost 2 weeks, how many groups truly reach their release goals? I'd personally rather have a stable and solid 6.8 release than worry about a buggy 6.8 that crashes on me. Also xorg is on a cycle where they plan on making 2-3 eleases every year vs the beyond slow release schedule that the xfree86 team had. Next I feel that the xfree86 group's license change was not called for and it was done because there were rumors that x was going to be forked so they changed it simply to "protect" their code so to say. Finally xorg is working on actually making x11 a modern day xserver and not so ancient. whats really going to be nice is the direction that xorg is headed. When they add opengl acceleration its going to take x to whole new levels and the modular x will also make it easier patch, update and maintain x.

To make it short xorg has newer features, is being backed by most vendors and is gpl compliant.

  • 3 weeks later...

GPL-compliant doesn't necessarily mean that it is licenesed under the GPL.

The reason that many of us think it is important is that a change in licensing terms can allow software to be propriatary and closed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!