• 0

What's the BEST RAD Programming Language/IDE?

Asked by _kane81,

 Share

What's the BEST RAD Programming Language/IDE?  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. What's the BEST RAD Programming Language/IDE?

    • Borland C++ (C++)
      2
    • Delphi 7 (Object Pascal)
      3
    • Delphi 8 (Object Pascal & .net)
      0
    • Eclipse (Java)
      3
    • Visual Basic 6 (Basic)
      2
    • Visual Studio.net (Visual Basic.net, C#)
      31
    • Visual C++ (C++)
      2
    • NotePad (... suitable for all languages :) )
      2
    • JBuilder (Java)
      0
    • Other (for the ones I can't fit in this poll)
      1

Question

Veteran

_kane81

Posted
Posted

What's the BEST Rapid Application Developement Programming Language/IDE in your opinion?

I saw a post where someone was asking what was the easiest language to learn programming with and saw a number of opinions.

I thought a poll would be a good way to expressing and seeing these opinions.

IDE (Intergrated Development Environment) a program that allows you to develop applications in a given language.

RAD (Rapid Application Developement) describes a programming language and an IDE in which you can very quickly and easily create an application.

BTW: My Fav RAD is Delphi

-HTML, XML is not a programming language or IDE

Feel free guys to point out anything I have stated incorrectly..... I'm humble and don't know everything

15 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Mentor

eye_see_you

Posted
Posted

I've worked with javascript , java , vb.net, asp.net and I have to say of all the developement tools such as borlland's Jbuilder or visiual studio.net I use notepad more than anything just because its simple to work with snippets of code or almost anything. What can I say i'm a simplistic person.

  • 0
Grand Master

+virtorio MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

I am an old C++Builder user from way back and it is still my preferred IDE. Delphi (VCL) is also easy for me (as C++Builder and Delphi share the same classes and controls, the VCL) but I don?t really care for Pascal that much.

My second choice is C#Builder (which I think is better than the Visual Studio C#./NET IDE).

Third choice is Visual C++ (MFC).

I hate working with java, mainly because its slow and looks awful.

  Quote
Back in the day, Quick Basic 4.5 was about as good as it got. thumbs_up.gif
Thats what I thought until I got Visual Basic for DOS. That was hot stuff when I first used it.
  • 0
Grand Master

Bearded Kirklander

Posted
Posted
  virtorio said:
I am an old C++Builder user from way back and it is still my preferred IDE. Delphi (VCL) is also easy for me (as C++Builder and Delphi share the same classes and controls, the VCL) but I don?t really care for Pascal that much.

My second choice is C#Builder (which I think is better than the Visual Studio C#./NET IDE).

Third choice is Visual C++ (MFC).

I hate working with java, mainly because its slow and looks awful.

Thats what I thought until I got Visual Basic for DOS. That was hot stuff when I first used it.

I had that too. I felt it was simply too confusing. It felt so out of place at the time. I guess for me the move from simply single-user DOS interface programming using libraries was harder for me than it was for some. Programming for a Mouse needs more code. But also, some of the built in stuff, like the widgets for drive and folder selection were not as good as some of the 3rd party libraries, at least it seemed that way to me. QB 4.5 was clean and lean and fast and I guess I got used to it.

I gave up on VB for Windows after they started changing the syntax. Plus I always hated the runtime aspect of it. A true compiler is what they had in DOS and I guess it is what I expected in Windows. But hey, to each his/her own:):)

  • 0
Grand Master

+virtorio MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted
  Quote
I prefer VS.NET, but you need the .NET framework, a big download if you just want to distribute a small program :(

---

I wish folks were not forced to use .net. It is not needed for many, many programs.

You can build non .net applications with Visual Studio .NET

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Microsoft failed to fix Windows Vista startup sound in Windows 11, but it is not giving up

      By Batfink · Posted

      And we think AI can take over lower level programmers jobs? Just search for the SHA hash for the "rogue" sound file and delete it.
    • Meta will use AI to summarize your WhatsApp messages

      By David Uzondu · Posted

      Meta will use AI to summarize your WhatsApp messages by David Uzondu Recently, Meta announced that ads are coming to WhatsApp, appearing in Status and Channels. Now, another update is on its way, this time in the form of a new feature called "Message Summaries", that leverages Meta's AI to summarize your chats for you. For those moments when you are drowning in unread messages, you can choose to have the AI generate a quick summary to get the gist of a conversation. To address the immediate privacy alarms this sets off, Meta says that its "Private Processing technology" will be used. This supposedly ensures that neither Meta nor WhatsApp can see your original messages or the private summaries the AI generates. To prove its sincerity, Meta published a deep technical white paper that explains how this privacy is supposed to be maintained. In the technical documentation, Meta explains the way it works is built on "Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs)". These TEEs are essentially secure, isolated black boxes running on a server, powered by hardware like NVIDIA H100 GPUs. Your phone establishes a direct, encrypted connection to one of these TEEs, sends the message data for processing, and receives the summary. Meta's own administrators and other systems supposedly cannot peek inside this box. And when the job is done, no message is retained. The security of the entire system hinges on being able to trust that this TEE is what it claims to be. Meta's system uses a process called remote attestation. Before your phone sends any data, it demands proof from the server. This proof is a cryptographic report, signed by the hardware itself, verifying that the TEE is running the exact, unmodified software that Meta has publicly logged with a third party like Cloudflare. Only if that proof checks out does the connection proceed. Users will have control over this process. The feature is off by default, and a setting under "Advanced Chat Privacy" will let you specify which chats can be shared for AI features. Message Summaries is currently rolling out in English for users in the US, with Meta planning for a global expansion sometime next year.
    • Microsoft explains how New Outlook for Windows haters are wrong and why it's a great app

      By Bern@rd · Posted

      It's never a good sign when the developer is gaslighting its customers.
    • Microsoft failed to fix Windows Vista startup sound in Windows 11, but it is not giving up

      By Bern@rd · Posted

      Unpopular (or maybe popular?) opinion: I prefer Windows Vista's startup chime than W11.
    • Microsoft explains how New Outlook for Windows haters are wrong and why it's a great app

      By bikeman25 · Posted

      Well I tried New Outlook a bit in the past, But was concerned on the privacy aspect with Gmail Imap and Comcast.net email going to Microsoft Servers. I've been using Outlook Classic since 1997 on my Personal systems, so for now think will stick with that, but i could get used to New Outlook i think fairly quickly if i forced to in the future. Anyhow who knows maybe it will be as good as Outlook Classic in the future, never know

  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      solidox earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      blissa jayden earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      blissa jayden earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      blissa jayden earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      578
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      216
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      155
    5. 5
      Som
      151
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!