• 0

What's the BEST RAD Programming Language/IDE?


What's the BEST RAD Programming Language/IDE?  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. What's the BEST RAD Programming Language/IDE?

    • Borland C++ (C++)
      2
    • Delphi 7 (Object Pascal)
      3
    • Delphi 8 (Object Pascal & .net)
      0
    • Eclipse (Java)
      3
    • Visual Basic 6 (Basic)
      2
    • Visual Studio.net (Visual Basic.net, C#)
      31
    • Visual C++ (C++)
      2
    • NotePad (... suitable for all languages :) )
      2
    • JBuilder (Java)
      0
    • Other (for the ones I can't fit in this poll)
      1


Question

What's the BEST Rapid Application Developement Programming Language/IDE in your opinion?

I saw a post where someone was asking what was the easiest language to learn programming with and saw a number of opinions.

I thought a poll would be a good way to expressing and seeing these opinions.

IDE (Intergrated Development Environment) a program that allows you to develop applications in a given language.

RAD (Rapid Application Developement) describes a programming language and an IDE in which you can very quickly and easily create an application.

BTW: My Fav RAD is Delphi

-HTML, XML is not a programming language or IDE

Feel free guys to point out anything I have stated incorrectly..... I'm humble and don't know everything

15 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I've worked with javascript , java , vb.net, asp.net and I have to say of all the developement tools such as borlland's Jbuilder or visiual studio.net I use notepad more than anything just because its simple to work with snippets of code or almost anything. What can I say i'm a simplistic person.

  • 0

I am an old C++Builder user from way back and it is still my preferred IDE. Delphi (VCL) is also easy for me (as C++Builder and Delphi share the same classes and controls, the VCL) but I don?t really care for Pascal that much.

My second choice is C#Builder (which I think is better than the Visual Studio C#./NET IDE).

Third choice is Visual C++ (MFC).

I hate working with java, mainly because its slow and looks awful.

  Quote
Back in the day, Quick Basic 4.5 was about as good as it got. thumbs_up.gif
Thats what I thought until I got Visual Basic for DOS. That was hot stuff when I first used it.
  • 0
  virtorio said:
I am an old C++Builder user from way back and it is still my preferred IDE. Delphi (VCL) is also easy for me (as C++Builder and Delphi share the same classes and controls, the VCL) but I don?t really care for Pascal that much.

My second choice is C#Builder (which I think is better than the Visual Studio C#./NET IDE).

Third choice is Visual C++ (MFC).

I hate working with java, mainly because its slow and looks awful.

Thats what I thought until I got Visual Basic for DOS. That was hot stuff when I first used it.

I had that too. I felt it was simply too confusing. It felt so out of place at the time. I guess for me the move from simply single-user DOS interface programming using libraries was harder for me than it was for some. Programming for a Mouse needs more code. But also, some of the built in stuff, like the widgets for drive and folder selection were not as good as some of the 3rd party libraries, at least it seemed that way to me. QB 4.5 was clean and lean and fast and I guess I got used to it.

I gave up on VB for Windows after they started changing the syntax. Plus I always hated the runtime aspect of it. A true compiler is what they had in DOS and I guess it is what I expected in Windows. But hey, to each his/her own:):)

  • 0
  Quote
I prefer VS.NET, but you need the .NET framework, a big download if you just want to distribute a small program :(

---

I wish folks were not forced to use .net. It is not needed for many, many programs.

You can build non .net applications with Visual Studio .NET

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I was going to say that search engines and such, have been scraping everyone's copyright, IP and data, since the beginning of the internet.
    • Microsoft is officially making the Xbox app on PC a universal launcher by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe It was earlier this year that an image mockup from Microsoft showed the Xbox app on PC with an interesting change: including support for other PC stores on the app, teasing that it may be becoming a universal launcher like GOG Galaxy or Playnite. Considering the company's new handheld initiative that will house a brand-new gaming-focused version of Windows, it was clear that this feature was on the way. And now, Xbox Insiders have access. Announced today as the 'aggregated gaming library' feature, it's poised to land this holiday on the ROG Xbox Ally and ROG Xbox Ally X to easily manage all their installed games from a single place. But before that, Xbox Insiders on PC can have a crack at it to see how it functions and provide feedback to Microsoft. In its current state, Microsoft says that the feature now supports Xbox, Game Pass, Battle.net, and "other leading PC storefronts," all handled via the Xbox PC app. The company did not detail what these other storefronts are, but Steam, Epic Games Store, Ubisoft Connect, and EA Play apps seem likely candidates. "Whether you’re on a Windows PC or a handheld device, your Xbox library, hundreds of Game Pass titles, and all your installed games from leading PC storefronts will now be at your fingertips," said the company. When a game from a supported store is installed on a PC, Insiders should now see it appear on the Xbox app in the My Library and Most Recent sections for easy access. "And this is just the beginning," adds Microsoft. "We’ll continue rolling out support for additional PC storefronts over time." Insiders can also disable this functionality and hide games from specific stores if needed from the Settings > Library & Extensions menu. Anyone interested in testing out the new 'aggregated gaming library' update can use the Xbox Insider app on PC to enroll in the ongoing Insider Previews.
    • Get this powerful mini PC with Core Ultra 9, 32GB RAM, and 1TB SSD for just $799 by Taras Buria The ASUS NUC 14 Pro+ is a powerful mini PC with capable hardware, and right now, you can get it on Amazon with a big discount. At just $799, this computer offers a Core Ultra 9 processor, 32GB of memory, and a 1TB SSD. The NUC 14 Pro+ features a low-profile aluminum chassis, which can be opened without removing rubber feet or undoing any screws. Its toolless design lets you access the storage without a screwdriver. The computer also has a rich set of ports. On the front side, you will find two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C, one USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C, and a power button. Unlike the Mac mini, which has a frustrating power button placement, the power button in the NUC 14 Pro+ is located where it should be. The back of the NUC 14 Pro+ has a DC-in port, two Thunderbolt 4 ports, one 2.5G Ethernet port, one USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A, one USB 2.0 Type-A, two HDMI 2.1, and a Kensington lock. Finally, there is a VESA mount, which lets you place the device on the back of your monitor for a cleaner desk. The computer is powered by Intel's 14th-gen Core Ultra 9 185H processor, 32GB of DDR5 memory, and a 1TB PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD. Windows 11 Home is preinstalled, so you do not need to bring your own drive, memory, or Windows 11 license. ASUS NUC 14 Pro+ Core Ultra 9 185H, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD - $799.99 | 27% off on Amazon US This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • This guy is just salty that Waymo is about to get buried by a company with cars that cost significantly less, charge significantly lower fares, and will soon dramatically outnumber their fleet. Waymo made the mistake of not reducing their vehicle cost quick enough and not overcoming their route limitations. Unless they start allowing their cars to use the freeways and have significantly wider geofencing, they're going to soon join the list of discontinued Google products. If Tesla wasn't the one to make them irrelevant, somebody else soon was. There's a long list of companies designing robotaxis right now.
    • LOL. Hard to believe people still fall for this. If you are having some sort of issue, I would work on fixing that instead turning off these settings.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      fredss earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      fabioc earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      GoForma earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      GoForma earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ravenmanNE earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      651
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      226
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      218
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      146
    5. 5
      Xenon
      137
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!