• 0

What's the BEST RAD Programming Language/IDE?


What's the BEST RAD Programming Language/IDE?  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. What's the BEST RAD Programming Language/IDE?

    • Borland C++ (C++)
      2
    • Delphi 7 (Object Pascal)
      3
    • Delphi 8 (Object Pascal & .net)
      0
    • Eclipse (Java)
      3
    • Visual Basic 6 (Basic)
      2
    • Visual Studio.net (Visual Basic.net, C#)
      31
    • Visual C++ (C++)
      2
    • NotePad (... suitable for all languages :) )
      2
    • JBuilder (Java)
      0
    • Other (for the ones I can't fit in this poll)
      1


Question

What's the BEST Rapid Application Developement Programming Language/IDE in your opinion?

I saw a post where someone was asking what was the easiest language to learn programming with and saw a number of opinions.

I thought a poll would be a good way to expressing and seeing these opinions.

IDE (Intergrated Development Environment) a program that allows you to develop applications in a given language.

RAD (Rapid Application Developement) describes a programming language and an IDE in which you can very quickly and easily create an application.

BTW: My Fav RAD is Delphi

-HTML, XML is not a programming language or IDE

Feel free guys to point out anything I have stated incorrectly..... I'm humble and don't know everything

15 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I've worked with javascript , java , vb.net, asp.net and I have to say of all the developement tools such as borlland's Jbuilder or visiual studio.net I use notepad more than anything just because its simple to work with snippets of code or almost anything. What can I say i'm a simplistic person.

  • 0

I am an old C++Builder user from way back and it is still my preferred IDE. Delphi (VCL) is also easy for me (as C++Builder and Delphi share the same classes and controls, the VCL) but I don?t really care for Pascal that much.

My second choice is C#Builder (which I think is better than the Visual Studio C#./NET IDE).

Third choice is Visual C++ (MFC).

I hate working with java, mainly because its slow and looks awful.

  Quote
Back in the day, Quick Basic 4.5 was about as good as it got. thumbs_up.gif
Thats what I thought until I got Visual Basic for DOS. That was hot stuff when I first used it.
  • 0
  virtorio said:
I am an old C++Builder user from way back and it is still my preferred IDE. Delphi (VCL) is also easy for me (as C++Builder and Delphi share the same classes and controls, the VCL) but I don?t really care for Pascal that much.

My second choice is C#Builder (which I think is better than the Visual Studio C#./NET IDE).

Third choice is Visual C++ (MFC).

I hate working with java, mainly because its slow and looks awful.

Thats what I thought until I got Visual Basic for DOS. That was hot stuff when I first used it.

I had that too. I felt it was simply too confusing. It felt so out of place at the time. I guess for me the move from simply single-user DOS interface programming using libraries was harder for me than it was for some. Programming for a Mouse needs more code. But also, some of the built in stuff, like the widgets for drive and folder selection were not as good as some of the 3rd party libraries, at least it seemed that way to me. QB 4.5 was clean and lean and fast and I guess I got used to it.

I gave up on VB for Windows after they started changing the syntax. Plus I always hated the runtime aspect of it. A true compiler is what they had in DOS and I guess it is what I expected in Windows. But hey, to each his/her own:):)

  • 0
  Quote
I prefer VS.NET, but you need the .NET framework, a big download if you just want to distribute a small program :(

---

I wish folks were not forced to use .net. It is not needed for many, many programs.

You can build non .net applications with Visual Studio .NET

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I use Outlook Classic but after decades it still doesn’t support Google Calendar and Contacts properly (not a big issue for me but is for some of my clients) and doesn’t have unified mailboxes to aggrigate multiple mail accounts.
    • Lol, replacing a wav file is that difficult for a software giant? Must be one of their devs that set some permissions/restrictions on it...
    • Sure, let them keep building for "most", I'm in no rush to buy such unreliable disposable vehicles...
    • Chrome extension blocks social media until you scream "I'm a loser" by David Uzondu Social media addiction is a problem that affects millions, with studies suggesting roughly 10% of Americans are hooked and hundreds of millions more are dealing with it around the world. We have seen some creative ways to reduce their reliance on social media, like the one we reported on recently about using an $8 smart plug to physically block websites. Now, a new Chrome extension takes the concept of adding friction to a completely new level of personal humiliation. The extension, called Scream to Unlock, was created by developer Pankaj Tanwar. He made a Show HN post on Hacker News today explaining that regular site blockers were just not annoying enough to work for him. His solution forces you to enable your microphone and screech "I'm a loser" to get access to sites like X, Facebook, and Instagram. The louder you yell, the more time the extension grants you. Once you install it, trying to visit a blocked site brings up a stark "Access Restricted" message. You are then prompted to perform your self-deprecating chant. After you give in and yell the phrase, the extension grants you access for a set amount of time. The concept is built on you being too embarrassed to yell. And boy, you have to be loud to please it. If your scream's volume is under 30, the extension mocks you with, "You sound like a mouse!". Getting above that might earn you a "Not bad, but you can do better!", while a truly powerful yell (100% volume and above) gets you an "AMAZING! That was an epic scream!". During my own test, I yelled the phrase at what felt like a respectable volume, only to get the mouse treatment. It granted me a measly 23 seconds on X. So if you are interested in this extension, for God's sake, do not try it in an office. Your coworkers will probably think you have finally lost it and are performing some bizarre humiliation ritual at your desk. The Chrome extension's description on the Chrome Web Store claims that all audio processing happens locally and no data is collected. That is not entirely true. Digging into the code, Neowin noticed that it uses window.SpeechRecognition to handle speech recognition. In Chrome, this API sends your voice data to Google's servers for processing. So while Tanwar himself might not be collecting your data, you should be aware of Google's involvement.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      solidox earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      blissa jayden earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      blissa jayden earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      blissa jayden earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      216
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      152
    5. 5
      Som
      151
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!