Recommended Posts

Dude what the hell is that on your chin???  :o  :o

oh its a goatee....  :ninja:

586192784[/snapback]

Facial hair, my friend. Give it about 15 years, and soon you'll start a sproutin'.

Disrespect my friend again, please. And I'll get my gang of thugz to holla' down yo' neck biatch.*

:sleep:

.:YodaGP:. why did you add me on msn just to tell me I was hot and congratulate me?  Although my boyfriend was on the computer instead lol... at least I think it was you seen as you have the same avatar as you msn display pic  :huh:

586199798[/snapback]

Stalker! :ninja: :ninja: :ninja:

Oh and Yodaguy, you added her to give her "congratulations" on being hot? :rofl:

Funniest

Post

Ever! :laugh:

Lock your doors, Babydoll. He knows no bounds...you might be seeing something like this someday... :wacko:

post-117580-1121154970.jpg

Stalker! :ninja:  :ninja:  :ninja:

Oh and Yodaguy, you added her to give her "congratulations" on being hot? :rofl:

Funniest

Post

Ever! :laugh:

Lock your doors, Babydoll. He knows no bounds...you might be seeing something like this someday... :wacko:

586199811[/snapback]

Yeh is quite scary lol ... :laugh: (that picture scares me lol :( )

Well I was sitting next to my bf, and he added me and said I'm only adding you to tell you that your hot and me and my bf were laughing then my bf spoke and said it was him and he was like well congratulations your girlfriends hot bye! then he went offline lol well blocked me I think :laugh:

Well I was sitting next to my bf, and he added me and said I'm only adding you to tell you that your hot and me and my bf were laughing then my bf spoke and said it was him and he was like well congratulations your girlfriends hot bye!  then he went offline lol well blocked me I think  :laugh:

586199852[/snapback]

LOL :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

He was hoping to get you alone and flirt with you and say "sweet" things to you so you might respond and when the bf came in he freaked out. :o

I wonder if he'll ever show his face in here after that. :ninja:

Oh and to all the girls in here, if guys on Neowin PM you about how cute you are or harrass you, just post whatever they say in this thread and you'll never have to hear from them again. :laugh:

Thought process:

1) I'm a geek on a web-based forum

2) Wow look a girl

3) I'll compliment her

4) No reaction? I'll contact her directly.

5) MSN, now surely she'll give me the sugar.

6) Eek, this particularly attractive girl has a boyfriend - who'd have guessed.

7) Run for the hills and never show my face again.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!