• 0

NOD32 or Norton?


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

let me give u a quick over run of what to look for in a antivirus and the best antivirus . basically companys like norton rls antivirus updates very fast but they only release signature files, basically a signature is make for specific virus's and will only fix it for a particular virus. the best way to stop virus;s is with a algirthium ( cant spell ok ) basically waht it does it does it plug possible ways virus;s will run . Nowdays they all pretty much use algorthms aswell as signatures ( cause faster to make signatures offcourse ) but best company i would sujest for antivirus's is www.iis.com . they are run by a group called xforce who are a leadering security research company.

  • 0

NOD is simply the best.

I used to use Norton, and it slowed my PC down big time. Ever since I got rid of Norton and started using NOD, I felt as if I bought a new CPU!

As far as virus detection goes, NOD is just as good if not better than Norton. You can see NOD's impressive record at virusbulletin.com.

  • 0

I've tried just about all of the antivirus programs out there. I would prefer a combo antivirus/firewall program. I'm currently using NOD32, which I like (not a resource hog), so I think I'll stay with that. Now, if I could only decide on a firewall. I'm tired of switching av & firewall programs every other week.

  • 0
hmm suppose that is true, their isnt really any point in having all the features that you get with Norton, Shredder etc. What features does NOD32 have?

It scans for Viruses :p

And it does it faster than any other AV proggie i used. Virusbulitin rates it as having the highest detect rate also.

  • 0

Microsoft has chose NOD32 so it must be good. -waits for someone to flame microsoft- :rolleyes:

In fact, Microsoft itself is a four year customer of Eset and the software giant has just signed on for an additional two years of service. Microsoft places so much confidence in Eset's Nod32 antivirus product that it uses the software in its release labs.

Article: Eset Antivirus Beats Leading Vendors to the Punch

  • 0
I stated earlier to take a look at http://www.virusbulletin.com. This page subjectively compares major antivirus software...and NOD32 comes on top as far as detecting viruses.

But you've only got 14 posts - who is going to listen to a n00b! :p

heh... :rofl:

  • 0
you don't have to believe what i'm saying, just believe what the link says.

If I linked Microsoft you don't believe it as a trustworthy source just because I only got 14 posts?

I mean I don't care if you say Yes to that question, I just think that is pretty dumb.

Hey, when you made this post, you had a total of 15! You are well on your way to credibility... :D :rofl:

  • 0
you don't have to believe what i'm saying, just believe what the link says.

If I linked Microsoft you don't believe it as a trustworthy source just because I only got 14 posts?

I mean I don't care if you say Yes to that question, I just think that is pretty dumb.

this kind of attitude towards newbies are common in all forums. just post a bunch of (Y) on any RWI or off topics forums.

about nod32, it is among the best among the commercial AV products. certainly beats norton in terms of scanning speed and http scanning.

  • 0

its easy really , NOD32 is much powerfull in scanning and monitering than Norton and although its alot more lite on the system , so i think u cant compare them :)

I tried almost every well known antivirus , and finally i found thats NOD32 and KAV is the most powerfull antivirus out there , but KAV is like Norton , very heavy on the machine , and i dont like its GUI , NOD32 is more easy on the eye alot , and its options is very clear.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!