DataComputer Products


Recommended Posts

I don't know if this is the correct place, but if it needs to be move or remove, mods please do it for me.

I work @ a college (not gonna mention the name). This "company" tried to send us a package to try their products first, it was all verbal. After the college receive the package, like 2 weeks later they send the invoice. The college has talked to them several times, resulting in an argument between this company and the college. The college sent the package back to the company in a condition that the college was going to pay for the package to be sent. Whoever receive the package, refused to accept it. Doing a search for the company's name on the web, didnt find any result, but I found an interesting site, and wanted to share it with all of you.

Source: UFACC-L archives

Another Source (pdf document): Winter2004.pdf

Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:00:49 -0500

Reply-To: UF Accounting and SAMAS Issues <[email protected]>

Sender: UF Accounting and SAMAS Issues <[email protected]>

From: "Doty, Donna" <[email protected]>

Subject: Vendor Scam Alert - DataComputer Products

Comments: To: "Purchasing List Serv (Purchasing List Serv)"

<[email protected]>,

"Campus Computer Coordinators (Campus Computer Coordinators)"

<[email protected]>

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

The following company has been removed from the approved vendor file and is

prohibited from doing business with the University of Florida.

If you are to receive a phone call from this company, either HANG UP

IMMEDIATELY or transfer the call to me at my phone number below.

DataComputer Products

10 Lake St

Kauneonga Lake NY 12749-0999

The company, through telephone solicitation, encourages department personnel

to accept items (toner, printer cleaner sheets, etc.,) for 30-day evaluation

OR usually states that Purchasing has requested they call the department in

order to refill a previous order before a price increase occurs. We do not

do this. These vendors prey on unsuspecting University individuals who may

not know that this is a scam and commit to what sounds like a good deal.

Please note that once the order is received, the department is fiscally

responsible for payment of items, which we should purchase from approved

contract or otherwise reputable local vendors, at a much lower price.

Please forward this information to anyone in your department that may

receive contact from such unscrupulous vendors and remind everyone that any

solicitations from unknown vendors should be directed to the chief fiscal

person in your department or to Purchasing.

Together, we can work to prevent this from happening.

Thank you,

Donna

Donna S. Doty

Purchasing Coordinator II

University of Florida

102 Elmore Hall/PO Box 115250

Gainesville FL 32605

phone: edited

fax: edited

email: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

webpage: <http://www.purchasing.ufl.edu> www.purchasing.ufl.edu

Edited by EZRecovery
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/223967-datacomputer-products/
Share on other sites

one thing... you should not post your phone number

Hankyone, I understand your concern about the phone number, but it's not my telephone number. I just decided to do a search on the company, and what I found out I decided to share it with the rest of the people out there, because this company is probably going to scam other people or companies the same way. If I edit the information, it wont make any difference, because the source has the telephone number posted, but I will do it anyway. :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      561
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!