[MLB] Greatest Catch Ever?


Recommended Posts

Today is the 50th anniversary of Willie Mays' over the shoulder catch and no look throw. An article on ESPN.com is calling it the greatest catch in baseball history. Ugh, did no one see what Jim Edmonds did when he was an Angel still. I have never seen a catch as incredible as that. Mays's catch was great, no doubt, but the best? It was only dramatic because it was during a world series, so maybe the greatest clutch catch ever, but not the best. What do you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/224072-mlb-greatest-catch-ever/
Share on other sites

Oh wow, I forgot about Ozzie's behind, one handed groundball catch. That was way back when he was a Padre, that was absolutly magical. It hit a rock while he was diving, ricochet up and behind him and he caught it barehanded. Got up and threw the guy out, good old TWIB tapes. That's short for This Week in Baseball.

Edit: I found a picture of the catch, the video is way more impressive...

the edmonds catch was probably my favorite. i'm as big of a baseball fan as anyone, but im sorry, theres at least one play on web gems every couple nights better than willie mays's catch. the only thing that makes it remotely special is that it was in the world series. i just never found it that impressive

  • 1 year later...

No Contest Kids... Jim Edmonds Catch Was the Most Amazing Catch in Baseball History Hands Down... Jim Continues to Make Catches of that Stature Day In and Day Out... He is Defensively the Best Center Fielder of All Time... Mays Was a Great Player but in No Way Could he Ever Match the Highlight Reel Jim Has Put Up in His Career...

Willie Mays will be credited with having the greatest catch ever for a long time because sports journalists like nostalgia. Some of these guys grew up watching and idolizing Willie Mays so he will always hold a special place in their hearts. A lot of writers call Babe Ruth one of the greatest baseball players ever, and I doubt he'd even be a star if he played baseball today. He was a fat and out of shape alcoholic. I would bet that he wouldn't have even made it to the Major League level. The same goes with football. A lot of writers call Jim Brown the best running back ever and I would bet that he would not be nearly as good if he played today. The players are so much bigger, faster, and in better shape than when he played.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      524
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!