Recommended Posts

I am trying to Slipstream a DELL OEM XP Home CD with AutoStreamer.

I know you usually can't use a DELL OEM XP CD so I hvae tried using the "Windows share" option.

I have deleted the SVCPACK Folder from I386 & when I copy the I386 Folder to the "Windows share" Folder & then use AutoStreamer to select the "Windows share" Folder I get Run-time Error 5.

Can you tell me what your software is checking to produce this Error.?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/224252-autostreamer-1029/
Share on other sites

first, use version 1.0.30 (AutoStreamer Official Thread - 1.0.30)

next:

AutoStreamer when given a share path (i.e C:\MYSHARE) checks the following:

1. There must be a SETUP.EXE in the share path (i.e C:\MYSHARE\SETUP.EXE)

2. There must be a I386 folder in the share path (i.e C:\MYSHARE\I386)

3. There must not be an UPDATES subfolder in I386 (i.e C:\MYSHARE\I386\UPDATES)

4. There must be a NTOSKRNL.EX_ in the I386 path (i.e C:\MYSHARE\I386\NTOSKRNL.EX_)

If all those complete successfully, AutoStreamer unpacks NTOSKRNL.EX_ to a temporary folder and get its version (NTOSKRNL.EX_ is just a packed version of NTOSKRNL.EXE). Thus you will see the build...

If step 1 fails, you will see build: unknown

If step 2 fails, you will see build: unknown

If step 3 fails, you will see build: unsupported OEM

If step 4 fails, you will see build: unknown

/Raptor

4. There must be a NTOSKRNL.EX_ in the I386 path (i.e C:\MYSHARE\I386\NTOSKRNL.EX_)

If all those complete successfully, AutoStreamer unpacks NTOSKRNL.EX_ to a temporary folder and get its version (NTOSKRNL.EX_ is just a packed version of NTOSKRNL.EXE). Thus you will see the build...

/Raptor

Just checked my DELL OEM I386 Folder & it only has a NTOSKRNL.EXE file , which if I Right Click on it shows only "Copy" & "Extract" , so it seems to now its a compressed file.

Did a Search for ntos on the I386 Folder & it shows NTOSKRNL.EXE (uncompressed) & NTOSKRNL.EXE (compressed).

Mahaged to Copy compressed file to Desktop & was then able to Rename to NTOSKRNL.EX_ & Copy back to I386 Folder.

Mahaged to Copy compressed file to Desktop & was then able to Rename to NTOSKRNL.EX_ & Copy back to I386 Folder.

Used "Windows share" & it worked , however it didn't delete the Temp Folder \............. it created in the Volume I was using for "Windows share" Folder & also the SP1 file XPSP1A.EXE.

It also updated the "Windows share" Folder , annoying as I got a corrupted file message when I tried the CD I burnt from the ISO file.

So I created a new "Windows share" Folder & now when I select the Service Pack file it eventually says "Build:Share is already updated".???? which it isn't.

Tried re-starting Computer , but same message.?

When using Windows share, it treats it as a share, not a temp folder... that's why it doesnt delete it... if the share was on a network, how would people like AS to delete it!? Share=a place where installation files are kept for client needs.

What does it detect when you pick the new share?

What does it detect when you pick the new share?

Windows share:

Operating System: Windows XP Family

Build: 5.1.2600.1149 (Pre-SP2)

I have also tried Deleting "AutuStreamer" & re-install , but still get same message

"Share is allready updated".

I use Service Pack SP1a CD file XPSP1A.EXE , it worked the 1st time.

Perhaps "AutoStreamer" keeps a Flag somewhere , but checked the Registry for autostreamer & can't see any , or is there an AutoStreamer Log/Text file.?

Also have to use "Windows share" option because I have OEM DELL XP CD & "AutoStreamer" doesn't dectect this XP CD because it doesn't have file ntoskrnl.ex_ , it has file ntoskrnl.exe (a compressed file) so I copy the XP CD to Windows share folder & add ntoskrnl.ex_

Doesn't have an I386\UPDTES Folder is has I386\SVCPACK Folder & worked before.?

Can't created an ISO only (Copy) of OEM DELL XP CD because of ntoskrnl.ex_ check , would work if "AutoStreamer" only checked for a file of name ntoskrnl

if it detects 5.1.2600.1149 (Pre-SP2), then of course SP1A will not work... 5.1.2600.1149 (Pre-SP2) is the version of your NTOSKRNL.EX_ Where did you get that file anyway? Since it wasnt on your CD?

OK thanks.

I also have XP Professional + SP1a on my Computer & when I had to created another "Windows share" Folder of my OEM DELL XP CD I used Search on my XP Pro+SP1a for file ntoskrnl.exe , copyied it to Desktop & changed the name to ntoskrnl.ex_ , then added it to "Windows share" Folder I386.

Now using the OEM DELL XP file ntoskrnl.exe & its works OK again.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!