Recommended Posts

The second is this letter I wrote to Maddox asking for help on the situation, but I figured I'd have better luck with you guys.

A guest speaker recently came to our school on the subject of pirating music. To make a long story short, it got way out of hand, hardly any of the kids in the audience were listening, calling out stupid obscenities, or being just plain rude. Finally the speaker told the kids to “shut the f*ck up!”. I was thrilled! A guest speaker who has the guts to shut these kids up and discipline them!

Well after the speeches on “why pirating music is wrong” were over, she invited kids to use the microphones planted in the aisles to express their opinions on the subject. A few did, and they were given rather harsh but acceptable responses from the speaker.

Finally, one girl stood up, flicked her blond hair, adjusted her glasses, strutted over to the mic, and spoke in an “I’m better than you” accent. She basically asked the question “Maybe I should pirate music, after all, half the money I spend on it goes to supporting degrading and sexually explicit music videos.”. The audience of course cheered, in favor of what she said. What this young girl had neglected to listen to, was that this guest speaker was involved in designing pop music videos, the ones that she just devalued.

So the speaker, who had been listening to rude kids calling her a "stupid b*tch" for an hour, had 5 seconds to respond, and just had her occupation attacked and degraded, responded “Maybe you should get a shirt that shows less cleavage." I laughed, the audience gasped and laughed. The young girl cried, ran out the room and slammed the door.

Now the problem is, a lot of people are going to write letters to the organization that the guest speaker was involved in. I know for a fact that most of the letters will be on the side of the young girl, but I really admire the courage and discipline of the guest speaker. I fear her losing her job over something that needed to be done.

I need your help explaining to these kids how what the guest speaker did was justified, if not right.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/224597-guest-speaker-justified/
Share on other sites

Firstly, the young girl was absolutely defiant when she went against the speaker. Secondly, the young girl, together with the rest of the children, was wrong in the first place for being so rude to the speaker. Thirdly, the young girl asked for it herself when she replied, rudely to the speaker, that "Maybe I should pirate music, after all, half the money I spend on it goes to supporting degrading and sexually explicit music videos.".

I let you build your opinion from the analaysis I have made.

I dont think the speaker should have done that, the girl wasnt saying anything about her, she was only saying that most of the videos being made are sexually explicit, but the speaker personally attacked her, yes she was receiving a lot of abuse, but she still shouldn't lashout at people at that, by doing that job, she was being the human face of the company she represented, she should have thought before she said anything.

also, wtf does the title of this thread have to do with the content?

I don't think its right to ever show disrespect to adults, unless they are wrong. Technically downloading music is stealing, but I have mixed views and think that the money made by recording studios far outweighs the casual downloader who just wants some singles. What the girl said is true, but obciously disrespectful.

how is what she said disrespectful ? she was asked to express her opinion, and then the guest speaker simply steps aside the issue with some lame ass retort. what kind of a guest speaker is that ? a crap one, thats what. you would have to be extremely naive to go to a high school thinking that kids are going to listen to you about why d/ling music is wrong.

Edited by filter04

Snot? Anyways, (I agree) the personal attack wasn't warranted. Also, your side of the story is simply your version. I'm not saying it's wrong at all. I'm just saying that in a situation like this, people in your school are going to have differing opinions on how this all went down.

There's never a time when a speaker needs to come in to talk about something impersonal and then make it personal. It also sounds like this speaker was a bit too daring and just took it too far. (Is this at a college?)

The situation should have been controlled by administrators before it ever got the point of having a speaker yell obscenities to get students to shut up. That is immediately wrong for a speaker to do. I can't think of a better way to lose an entire audience than to say something as stupid as that. Here, let me talk to you guys on this pirating music (which is already controversial) - by the way STFU! Walking into an auditorium with kids, the speaker should have realized this is bound to happen and should govern herself in a much better way than telling kids to STFU. That's just stupid to me. You lost all credibility you once might have had by saying that. Leave it to the kids to get ****ed. The speaker needs to hold onto something, called composure and credibility.

Hi, I'm here to talk with you about pirating music today? What, you don't like it!? STFU! :rolleyes:

I still can't help but think in the back of my head (on your last part) about the last comments. The girl student said she was down with making those "degrading and sexually explicit videos" yet sounded to have on some revealing clothing. Hmmm...wouldn't this be the pot calling the kettle black? I think (honestly) if I was the speaker I would have had a hard time NOT making that comment. That's like an animal rights activist standing up at a protest with a mink coat on. :rolleyes: I mean, gimme a break.

The student shouldn't have said anything along those lines if she was wearing anything that could even remotely be considered revealing. It almost seemed like it was the student's chance to be cool and she blew it. So now, instead of her being remembered for her heroic comment, she's remembered by running out and crying. :rolleyes:

Sorry, but the guest speaker deserves to be fired. You don't come in and return an attack on a teenager. That shows how incredibly mindless you are.

As a guest speaker you represent not yourself, but the entire company or organization you support. She discredited all in her actions.

Sorry, but the guest speaker deserves to be fired. You don't come in and return an attack on a teenager. That shows how incredibly mindless you are.

As a guest speaker you represent not yourself, but the entire company or organization you support. She discredited all in her actions.

Justified, sure she was. SHOULD she have done it, obviously "no".

how is what she said disrespectful ? she was asked to express her opinion, and then the guest speaker simply steps aside the issue with some lame ass retort. what kind of a guest speaker is that ? a crap one, thats what. you would have to be extremely naive to go to a high school thinking that kids are going to listen to you about why d/ling music is wrong.

bingo. i dont think you ever pay attention to lectures in high school, espiecally ones as irrelevant as music sharing. The girl was asked for her opinion, she complied, she got insulted. Wheres the fairness?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Is the article messed up? I understand 26H2 is in Beta, now Build 28020.2308. I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean: "..... Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2." And...would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!