• 0

External IP address


Question

Hello,

I'm using c# .net and I would like to know how can I get my external IP. I was looking over the Internet and couldn't find a solution :wacko: Maybe somebody here knows how to do it? I can also try to convert a VB .NET code so if you know how to do it with VB that's OK.

Thanks in advance for your answers :) I really appreciate this.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/225737-external-ip-address/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I've found this code, but I can't make it work :( Can someone tell me how to use it with c#?

Here it is:

// Before calling AddIPAddress we use GetIpAddrTable to get
// an adapter to which we can add the IP.
PMIB_IPADDRTABLE pIPAddrTable;
DWORD dwSize = 0;

pIPAddrTable = (MIB_IPADDRTABLE*) malloc( sizeof( MIB_IPADDRTABLE) );

// Make an initial call to GetIpAddrTable to get the
// necessary size into the dwSize variable
if (GetIpAddrTable(pIPAddrTable, &dwSize, 0) == ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER) {
  GlobalFree( pIPAddrTable );
  pIPAddrTable = (MIB_IPADDRTABLE *) malloc ( dwSize );
}

// Make a second call to GetIpAddrTable to get the
// actual data we want
if ( (dwRetVal = GetIpAddrTable( pIPAddrTable, &dwSize, 0 )) == NO_ERROR ) { 
  printf("\tAddress: %ld\n", pIPAddrTable->table[0].dwAddr);
}

It is from MSDN site.

  • 0
u could make a HTTP file downloaded from www.whatismyip.com!!!

Then u can check the HTML code for the IP address...

Simple :p lol

Is it legal ? And even if it is - it will take a long time for dial up modem users to load it. I want a faster way to get the IP address - even if your'e not connected or if you have a dial up modem.

BTW - check this: http://dotnet247.com/247reference/msgs/10/53244.aspx. I think I need something similar.

Edited by yyy
  • 0

Well, I've figured out how to do it in C# :laugh: (I use the code that I've found in the site)

HOWEVER, I know only how to use it as a console application. I want to use it inside a form. Can you tell me how I can use this code inside a form so it will show the text in a label ?

Here is the code as a console application:

using System;
using System.Net;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;

struct MIB_IPADDRROW
{
public int dwAddr;
public int dwIndex;
public int dwMask;
public int dwBCastAddr;
public int dwReasmSize;
public short unused1;
public short unused2;
}

class C
{
[DllImport("iphlpapi.dll")]
static extern int GetIpAddrTable(
IntPtr pIpAddrTable,
ref int pdwSize,
bool bOrder);

static string IPToString(int ipaddr)
{
return String.Format( "{0}.{1}.{2}.{3}",
(ipaddr >> 24) & 0xFF, (ipaddr >> 16) & 0xFF,
(ipaddr >> 8) & 0xFF, ipaddr & 0xFF);
}

static void Main()
{
IntPtr pBuf = IntPtr.Zero;
int nBufSize = 0;

GetIpAddrTable( IntPtr.Zero, ref nBufSize, false );
try {
pBuf = Marshal.AllocHGlobal( nBufSize );
int r = GetIpAddrTable( pBuf, ref nBufSize, false );
if ( r != 0 )
throw new System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception( r );

#if USE_UNSAFE_CODE

unsafe {
int nNumRows = *((int*)(void*)pBuf);

MIB_IPADDRROW* pRow =
(MIB_IPADDRROW*)(void*)(IntPtr)((int)pBuf + sizeof(int));
while ( nNumRows-- > 0 ) {
Console.WriteLine( IPToString( IPAddress.NetworkToHostOrder(
pRow->dwAddr ) ) );
pRow++;
}
}


}
catch (Exception ex) {
Console.WriteLine( ex.Message );
}
finally {
if ( pBuf != IntPtr.Zero )
Marshal.FreeHGlobal( pBuf );
}
}

}

Please tell me how to use it in a form.

  • 0
Is it legal ? And even if it is - it will take a long time for dial up modem users to load it. I want a faster way to get the IP address - even if your'e not connected or if you have a dial up modem.

BTW - check this: http://dotnet247.com/247reference/msgs/10/53244.aspx. I think I need something similar.

Legal depends on whether whatismyip.com allow you to do it. It wouldn't take very long for dial-up users anyway.

If you're not connected to the Internet then you do not have an external IP address (or you'll have one in the 169 range which is useless anyway.) Getting the IP address from the computer itself isn't a good idea anyway since a lot of people use devices like routers where the computer is not assigned the external IP address as it is assigned to the router which creates a network between itself and the PC on an internal range of IPs.

  • 0
Legal depends on whether whatismyip.com allow you to do it. It wouldn't take very long for dial-up users anyway.

If you're not connected to the Internet then you do not have an external IP address (or you'll have one in the 169 range which is useless anyway.) Getting the IP address from the computer itself isn't a good idea anyway since a lot of people use devices like routers where the computer is not assigned the external IP address as it is assigned to the router which creates a network between itself and the PC on an internal range of IPs.

I once used http://checkip.dyndns.org/ to do this (I thought it is legal) and a dial up user of my program told me that it take him about a minute (which is a lot) to load the program. Finally I asked the site's webmaster if it is legal and he said it isn't.

But look at the code above - can't this code get the external IP always ? I think it does.

  • 0

Requirements (from MSDN):

Client: Requires Windows XP, Windows 2000 Professional, Windows NT Workstation 4.0 SP4 and later, Windows Me, or Windows 98.

Server: Requires Windows Server 2003, Windows 2000 Server, or Windows NT Server 4.0 SP4 and later.

So it won't work on win95. What a shame ;)

  • 0
Requirements (from MSDN):

Client: Requires Windows XP, Windows 2000 Professional, Windows NT Workstation 4.0 SP4 and later, Windows Me, or Windows 98.

Server: Requires Windows Server 2003, Windows 2000 Server, or Windows NT Server 4.0 SP4 and later.

So it won't work on win95. What a shame ;)

What won't work ? The code above? I don't mind. It is being done as a plug in for a program that doesn't work on Win 95 anyway :) So I don't mind.

But plese - I want to show the information inside a label - how can I do it?

BTW, the code was written by:

Mattias Sj?gren

[email protected]

http://www.msjogren.net

Edited by yyy
  • 0
Is it legal ? And even if it is - it will take a long time for dial up modem users to load it. I want a faster way to get the IP address - even if your'e not connected or if you have a dial up modem.

BTW - check this: http://dotnet247.com/247reference/msgs/10/53244.aspx. I think I need something similar.

How can you have an external IP address if you're not connected to the Internet? The only way that I know of to get your public IP address is to ask another machine on the Internet for your IP address. You won't be able to obtain it from some C++ or C# function that I'm aware of!

jafo

  • 0
How can you have an external IP address if you're not connected to the Internet?
Yes I know about this now.
The only way that I know of to get your public IP address is to ask another machine on the Internet for your IP address.  You won't be able to obtain it from some C++ or C# function that I'm aware of!

Oh really? :( Too bad you didn't tell me sooner. So I'll probably have to use a site. I saw once that there's a way to get the external IP but I didn't understand it.

Thanks anyway to everyone. If someone still finds a code soon I'll like to see it.

  • 0
<%@ Page Language="C#" %>
<%@ Import Namespace="System.IO" %>

<%

string ClientIP;
StreamWriter objStreamWriter;


ClientIP = Request.UserHostAddress.ToString();

IP.Text = ClientIP;


objStreamWriter = File.AppendText( MapPath( "beta_ip.txt" ) );
objStreamWriter.WriteLine( (ClientIP) );
objStreamWriter.Close();


%>

<html>
<body>


<form runat="server">
  <p>
<asp:Label id="IP" runat="server" />
  </p>
</form>
</body>
</html>

  • 0
<%@ Page Language="C#" %>
<%@ Import Namespace="System.IO" %>

<%

string ClientIP;
StreamWriter objStreamWriter;


ClientIP = Request.UserHostAddress.ToString();

IP.Text = ClientIP;


objStreamWriter = File.AppendText( MapPath( "beta_ip.txt" ) );
objStreamWriter.WriteLine( (ClientIP) );
objStreamWriter.Close();


%>

<html>
<body>


<form runat="server">
 ?<p>
<asp:Label id="IP" runat="server" />
 ?</p>
</form>
</body>
</html>

Thanks for the code:):) But I don't have a site. I need it for my application. Thanks anyway.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft releases new Windows 11 Media Creation Tool with the latest updates by Taras Buria Patch Tuesday updates arrive every month, bringing users new features and security updates. To make sure customers have access to the most recent images, Microsoft also releases updates to the Media Creation Tool app, its official utility for Windows 11 installation. Today, the company pushed new ISOs to Media Creation Tool, allowing you to create images with the June 2026 Patch Tuesday updates. With the latest update, the Media Creation Tool now downloads KB5094126. It is Windows 11 version 25H2, build 26200.8655, which is also available via Windows Update. Note that the app itself remains on the previous version, which you can check in Properties > Details. The only change is that it now downloads a more recent Windows 11 build, so the only way to check is to download an ISO. The June 2026 Patch Tuesday update is a special release for Windows 11, as it brings a new performance profile to make the operating system more responsive and snappier when rendering various user interface surfaces, including the Start menu, quick settings, and more. It does so by spiking processor speeds for a brief moment, resulting in higher loads for a second or two. The so-called “Low latency profile” is rolling out gradually, but you can force-enable it with the ViVeTool app. Other changes include webcam improvements, Task Manager updates, shared audio support, and more. You can download the Media Creation Tool app from the official Microsoft website using this link. Besides MCT, Microsoft lets you download Windows 11 ISO as a file directly from the official Windows 11 website. However, you will need a third-party app to write it to your USB drive. Check out this guide if you want to know how to do that.
    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!