Windows 2000 doesnt use HT Correctly?


Recommended Posts

Well a friend of mine is running a new p4 setup and has his windows 2000 cd which he is going to use. He has a chip with HT and 800mhz system bus, a few people told me HT doesnt work correctly in 2k, that XP is by far better, he doesnt want to buy XP unless he has to, he likes 2k and wants to stick with it. Did SP4 fix this problem? Thanks for you input

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/226593-windows-2000-doesnt-use-ht-correctly/
Share on other sites

  OptiPlex said:
It's not recommended you use Windows 2000 and HT together so turn off HT in the BIOS before installing it.

Win2k SHOULD run smoothly with HT on but I hear there's some negative impact on performance.

UNLESS YOU MULTITASK

cant forget that.

so unless he multitasks alot, turn it off, but I would leave it on, good to know its there

  Quote

Windows 2000 Professional is limited to two processors and doesn?t recognize the difference between a dual processor hyperthreaded system and a quad processor non-hyperthreaded systemThe 2nd logical processor on each physical processor would never be used.b>

  Quote
For Windows NT and Windows 2000, the answer i"It doesn't even know." These operating systems are not hyperthreading-aware because they were written before hyperthreading was invented.b> If you enable hyperthreading, then each of your CPUs looks like two separate CPUs to these operating systems. (And will get charged as two separate CPUs for licensing purposes.Since the scheduler doesn't realize the connection between the virtual CPUs, it can end up doing a worse job than if you had never enabled hyperthreading to begin with.b>
  Quote

A1 = CPU #1

A2 = Logical CPU #1

B1 = CPU #2

B2 = Logical CPU #2

Suppose you have two CPU-intensive tasks. As far as the Windows NT and Windows 2000 schedulers are concernedall four processors are equivalent, so it figure it doesn't matter which two it uses. And if you're unlucky, it'll pick A1 and A2, forcing one physical processor to shoulder two heavy loads (each of which will probably run at something between half-speed and three-quarter speed), leaving physical processor B idle; completely unaware that it could have done a better job by putting one on A1 and the other on B1.i>

Multitasking wouldn't even work properly in Windows 2000, those two statements explain it decently.

And HT has been known to make Win2k unstable or crash (not on all machines but some)

And in some cases it's been known to hurt performance.

It looks like HT causes more problems in Win2000 so my recommendation ... turn it off or hope it won't b0rk your install or anything...

Hmm

I am a bit confused here.

if the reasons why not to use it with w2k is true then why is it that Dual Xeon CPus used in servers running W2k server show up as 4 CPus and are used accordingly?

Here of all places i would notice a degradation in performance and response in the domain but this is not true.

Xeon 2.4 (533fsb) use HT technology without any problems in W2k server (same core as W2k pro).

My 3ghz prescott (w2k) runs all the same apps at the same level and power as my XP pro equivilent machine including 3dmark 2003,2005 & pcmark2004.

I dont have any problems with HT in W2k and performance in games and opengl Rendering is actually better in W2k with my ht cpu.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Finished Subnaitica 1 last year. In my 38 years of playing video games, it was such an awesome experience. Never have I felt a game that has left a mark. How did I manage that? I didn't read any guides or saw any videos until 15 hours in and also only looked up for very specific area I was stuck. Took me 50 -60 hours to finish.
    • Finished it recently. No weapons was just a great feature. You aren't military nor have military experience.
    • Excel, Word, and PowerPoint on the web grab welcome new feature by Usama Jawad The Microsoft 365 suite of software is a vital part of any organization that has decided to go with Microsoft's tech stack to meet its needs. As such, it's critical for the Redmond firm to continue upgrading the capabilities of its tools to retain its existing customers and attract new ones. And now, Microsoft has done just that by adding a very welcome new feature to some of its applications. Microsoft has announced that viewers of an Excel, PowerPoint, or Word file on the web can now directly request edit access to it. Previously, customers were forced to resort to workarounds to achieve the same purpose. One of these was to download a view-only file and make edits in a copy and reshare, while the other was to manually reach out to the owner of the file and ask them to give you edit access. Microsoft rightly acknowledged that these methods are too cumbersome and slow, so now it has integrated the option to directly request edit access in its web applications. In order to leverage this capability, customers need to do the following: Open the Excel, Word, or PowerPoint file on the web Click on the Viewing icon on the top-right Select Request more access Select the Ask to edit or Ask to review option, depending upon what you need You can optionally write a note to the file owner too; this can be used to provide more context about why you need additional rights Click send File owners will then receive an email with the request change in access along with the optional note, and they will be able to accept or deny the request directly from within the email. If they do the former, the requestor can refresh the file in order to get take advantage of increased access. That said, Microsoft has cautioned that the propagation of access elevation may take some time to reflect in large or complex documents, or those with many co-authors. Additionally, the capability is not supported in Classic View in Word for the web. However, it is available to all enterprise customers with Microsoft 365 and a stable internet connection as long as the file they are requesting elevated privilege for is available on OneDrive or SharePoint.
    • Things like these I would hope wasn't on the internet months prior launch. Having a WOW moment when it's presented to the audience for the first time would had been jaw dropping. (this amoung other tech accouncements)
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      K.I.S.S. earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      solidox earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      solidox earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Devesh Beri earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      956400 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      166
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      150
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      67
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!