How to setup a Linux File Server


Recommended Posts

  Fredde87 said:
what kind of fileserver? Like samba (for windows)? Just setup a distro with networking support and install (if not included) samba....

584830264[/snapback]

As simple as that ?

Do I have to turn off the GUI by editing the configuration text file to boot up in runlevel 3 ???

I havent decided on the distro yet.

I want it to be as efficient as possible so turning off the GUI will help preserve the resources right ? Also Windows v Linux File Server benches or speed comparisions would be handy if somebody know of something on those lines.

edit: Something like this ...

0_4537_2196106_00.gif

If its more recent like Red Hat 9.0 v Windows Server 2003

You will find conflicting results in testing. For example:

http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/first-nts4rhlinux.html favors Windows

and

http://www.kegel.com/nt-linux-benchmarks.html favors Linux/Samba

Most of the "Windows is better" results are off Microsoft-commisioned tests, where MS specs out how the machines are set up (often using known configs that are unfavorable on Linux). The independant ones generally use standard/typical configs for eash OS and test off of that.

As for a GUI, no you don't need to install any X Window system on your box. No Window Managers, either (obviously, if you don't have X capability). Reducing the number of installed packages will make your Linux box more secure (less items to be vunerable to exploit) and run faster (less items! :p ). You can manage the server remotely via command-line (via ssh), or by GUI (via webmin and using a web browser on your remote PC).

It would be interesting to grab an old PC ('386 or '486 if you have one) and set up a file server on both with current OS releases from a Linux distro and off of current Windows release and do your own comparison. :yes: Post your results here, if you can. (Y)

EDIT: Quote from a recent news article (dated yesterday!) on the Samba comparisons:

  Quote
Novell's Hogan says that Microsoft has often specified the exact system configuration in benchmark tests. For example, in two Veritest studies which compare Windows 2003 Server with Linux, Hogan asserts that Veritest fine-tuned the Windows set-up but did not do the same for Linux.

"The test used Windows protocols only, while Linux had to emulate the Windows protocols using Samba," says Hogan. "As far as we can see, the testers did not even make the smallest optimisation for this Linux/Samba setting, while Microsoft helped Veritest fine tune on Windows."

  jerry said:
I havent decided on the distro yet.

I want it to be as efficient as possible so turning off the GUI will help preserve the resources right ? Also Windows v Linux File Server benches or speed comparisions would be handy if somebody know of something on those lines.

584830320[/snapback]

I'd use Gentoo if I were you. I setup a secure ftp server for my web server class in only 3 steps.

1. Installed Gentoo.

2. Created the user accounts.

3. Put sshd on the run level.

thats all I had to do.

Now users can ssh to my box( using putty ) if they need to change password and stuff. And they can use any ftp client that can support file transfer over SFTP.

WinSCP is pretty nice .. I think FileZilla supports SFTP also (so does DreamWeaver's buitin FTP feature )

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Deal: JBL BAR 1000 7.1.4, BAR 700 5.1 Dolby Atmos wireless subwoofer soundbars by Sayan Sen If you are in the market for an audio system and are after smaller bookshelf speakers delivering highly accurate sound, then take a look at KEF and Polk Audio's Q Concerto Meta and Reserve R200 speakers, respectively, as both of them are up for sale at their lowest ever prices. However, if you are more into shaking your house, which is not possible without a subwoofer, then Samsung has its Q900F, Q800F, and Q600F soundbar systems with wireless subwoofers at the lowest prices. These are the latest 2025 models, and you can take a look at them in this article here. JBL BAR 1000 For those looking for additional options, JBL's BAR 1000 and Bar 700 are also available. The former has hit its lowest ever price too, while the latter is back to its cheapest (purchase links down below). JBL claims that its BAR 1000 model goes as low as 33Hz which is crucial for movie-watching or even some genres of music. The 10-inch subwoofer is rated at 300 watts of RMS power. The total power output of the system is 880 watts at THD (total harmonic distortion) of 1%. JBL BAR 1000 rear view Unlike the 7.1.4 JBL BAR 1000, the BAR 700 is a 5.1 system which means it lacks true Dolby Atmos, but it should still provide an Atmos-like experience. DTS:X is also not supported. The BAR 700 is rated at 620 watts. It is good to see some power ratings, as companies like Samsung, Sonos, Bose, and more tend not to mention them all too often nowadays. Interestingly, both the BAR systems have similarly-specced subwoofers so if bass is what you are looking for and do not care about the Atmos experience so much, you can opt for the BAR 700 too. Get them at the links below: JBL Bar 1000: 7.1.4-Channel soundbar with Detachable Surround Speakers, MultiBeam™, True Dolby Atmos®, and DTS:X®, Black: $799.95 (Shipped and Sold by Amazon US) JBL Bar 700: 5.1-Channel soundbar with Detachable Surround Speakers and Dolby Atmos®, Black: $549.95 (Amazon US) + you also get free 90-day Amazon Music This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Funny how just a few days ago we hear a lot of rumors that this device was cancelled.
    • Many order mixed mango yogurt.  
    • It's about the same actually. The oldest iPhone to support iOS 26 will likely be the iPhone 12, which was released in late 2020, so very similar. The current OS runs on the iPhone 11, 2019. Still, valid point, you expect to be able to use a computer for longer than a phone.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Epaminombas earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Veteran
      Yonah went up a rank
      Veteran
    • First Post
      viraltui earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      viraltui earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      LunaFerret earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      482
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      264
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      233
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      231
    5. 5
      Edouard
      176
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!