How to setup a Linux File Server


Recommended Posts

  Fredde87 said:
what kind of fileserver? Like samba (for windows)? Just setup a distro with networking support and install (if not included) samba....

584830264[/snapback]

As simple as that ?

Do I have to turn off the GUI by editing the configuration text file to boot up in runlevel 3 ???

I havent decided on the distro yet.

I want it to be as efficient as possible so turning off the GUI will help preserve the resources right ? Also Windows v Linux File Server benches or speed comparisions would be handy if somebody know of something on those lines.

edit: Something like this ...

0_4537_2196106_00.gif

If its more recent like Red Hat 9.0 v Windows Server 2003

You will find conflicting results in testing. For example:

http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/first-nts4rhlinux.html favors Windows

and

http://www.kegel.com/nt-linux-benchmarks.html favors Linux/Samba

Most of the "Windows is better" results are off Microsoft-commisioned tests, where MS specs out how the machines are set up (often using known configs that are unfavorable on Linux). The independant ones generally use standard/typical configs for eash OS and test off of that.

As for a GUI, no you don't need to install any X Window system on your box. No Window Managers, either (obviously, if you don't have X capability). Reducing the number of installed packages will make your Linux box more secure (less items to be vunerable to exploit) and run faster (less items! :p ). You can manage the server remotely via command-line (via ssh), or by GUI (via webmin and using a web browser on your remote PC).

It would be interesting to grab an old PC ('386 or '486 if you have one) and set up a file server on both with current OS releases from a Linux distro and off of current Windows release and do your own comparison. :yes: Post your results here, if you can. (Y)

EDIT: Quote from a recent news article (dated yesterday!) on the Samba comparisons:

  Quote
Novell's Hogan says that Microsoft has often specified the exact system configuration in benchmark tests. For example, in two Veritest studies which compare Windows 2003 Server with Linux, Hogan asserts that Veritest fine-tuned the Windows set-up but did not do the same for Linux.

"The test used Windows protocols only, while Linux had to emulate the Windows protocols using Samba," says Hogan. "As far as we can see, the testers did not even make the smallest optimisation for this Linux/Samba setting, while Microsoft helped Veritest fine tune on Windows."

  jerry said:
I havent decided on the distro yet.

I want it to be as efficient as possible so turning off the GUI will help preserve the resources right ? Also Windows v Linux File Server benches or speed comparisions would be handy if somebody know of something on those lines.

584830320[/snapback]

I'd use Gentoo if I were you. I setup a secure ftp server for my web server class in only 3 steps.

1. Installed Gentoo.

2. Created the user accounts.

3. Put sshd on the run level.

thats all I had to do.

Now users can ssh to my box( using putty ) if they need to change password and stuff. And they can use any ftp client that can support file transfer over SFTP.

WinSCP is pretty nice .. I think FileZilla supports SFTP also (so does DreamWeaver's buitin FTP feature )

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I happen to try it today not knowing about the update and was happily surprised; it is great.
    • Hello, Hardware Support Applications are a special kind of Microsoft Store app and have to go through additional checks and certifications because they can communicate directly with their driver, which means that a vulnerability in one of them could allow an attacker access to kernel space memory through the HSA ←→ device driver interface.  In other words, a BYOVD (bring your won vulnerable driver) attack, but with the HSA being used as an extra step. Remember, the Microsoft Store is strategic to Microsoft's long-term goals: they see it as the means to get the same 30% of every application sale that Apple and Google get through their stores, which is why it has been a fixture of Windows since Windows 8 was introduced in 2012 despite a low adoption rate.  Microsoft cannot afford to have anyone get an app through their store which causes a security issue for their end users.  Even if the app was written by and uploaded to the Microsoft Store by a partner, it is Microsoft's name on the store, and they are the ones that will have reputational/brand damage if they allow something malicious into their store. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This is more from my childhood, when nickelodeon just launched and had to license shows to have something to air. Left a big an impact, but probably more emotion positive / childhood thing. Europe got the follow up season's decade's latter with the animation studio that did Air Bender but never licenses for the US. I miss the day's of longer intro's. Nier (PS3) Intro is epic, and was very unexpected.  PS1 Xengears was also epic and an amazing game.  
    • Sayan Sen, do you think one day an image of the Windows Vista desktop or the wallpaper could be used in the primary image of an article? (When I think of CDs and DVDs I think of that release of Windows and of earlier releases; it is the one that debuted IMAPI 2.0 and other features.)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Ricky Chan earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      maimutza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      abortretryfail earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Mr bot earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      Bkl211 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      263
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      240
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      227
    5. 5
      Edouard
      188
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!