AutoPatcher 5.0 Info & Open Source Poll


Should AutoPatcher 5.0 be Open Source?  

140 members have voted

  1. 1. Should AutoPatcher 5.0 be Open Source?

    • Yep!
      91
    • No!
      45
    • What's open source?
      4


Recommended Posts

I see zero advantage of opening up the source for people. Raptor has done a terrific job of working on this project, releasiing your source basically will let everyone create some clone of your unique product!

Don't do it. Protect Your Baby! :no:

I see zero advantage of opening up the source for people. Raptor has done a terrific job of working on this project, releasiing your source basically will let everyone create some clone of your unique product!

Don't do it. Protect Your Baby! :no:

584911872[/snapback]

Agreed :yes:

I see zero advantage of opening up the source for people. Raptor has done a terrific job of working on this project, releasiing your source basically will let everyone create some clone of your unique product!

Don't do it. Protect Your Baby! :no:

584911872[/snapback]

Yeah, I'm feeling conflicted on making it Open Source. There's too much riding on your guys' success so far, and it's only going to get better if you continue coding it YOUR way, maybe bring in two more people to help with the work load. I just dont' see how making it open would be less work for you, because in the end, you'll have to oversee all the "iomprovements" anyway, which will take time that coudl have been less if you had just done it yourself. While I am usually pro-open source, I'm going to have to disagree on making AP open...you guys have put too much work into this program to possibly make a bad mistake just as soon as you guys are taking off and peopel other than neowinians are noticing.

I really can't think of any advantages of making AP open source either. You guys spend countless hours every week, month, day, etc. making AutoPatcher what it is today, and we wouldn't be here without your efforts. I also agree with the thought of bringing in at least one or two other well versed members who are experienced coders to help with the work load (not me though, I don't know any C++ or VBasic at all); but other than that I say keep it closed.

I have been in the open source community for quite some time now, and it works like a charm.

Sure there will be people ripping of other peoples stuff but that is a part of opensource. They can do what they want with it as long as the keep credit (use GPLv2).

But the mayor advantage is that everyone can help, as long as you guide it the right way the chances of getting riped by some ###### are slim.

In open source you should not be afraid to let people make forks of your software, let them see what they can do and learn from it.

For the rest, I realy hope you go open source!

Make it opensource.

More people working on it would give more options/ideas.

Especially for the database editor.

If not fully opensource then release some of it to specific developers that can help with the development.

I am a VB programmer but do not know XML. The code would help me in learning XML and could provide enough information to develop a database editor.

S

Yes, two reasons:

It will allow people that want to get a taste of a programming a great application a chance to learn from your skills

It will qualify you for Sourceforge hosting, instead of having to use torrents everytime you want to make a release.

There might be a downside, like companies that want to use AP rebadging it completely to make it look like that the guy who rebadged it, wrote the whole thing for the company internelly. He would take all the credit and potentially cheat you of donations from the company that ripped it off.

On the other hand, there might be developers out there that might want to port the engine to Windows NT (Oh man that would be so awesome for when you need something that runs on old hardware, SP7 would be so overdue since there have been so many patches since SP6a) or Windows 9x. Someone might even port the engine to Linux as a more scalable engine to replace yum, apt-get or emerge that are only availible for some distributions, someone might port AP engine to work will all distributions.

Edited by Quick Reply
All-In-One solution

You will be able to update any locale or version of Windows just by downloading the appropriate modules and running one file.

By this do you mean that updates for Windows 9x will also be possible or will it remain an XP kernel only autopatcher?

Yes, autopatcher will be able to detect win98 and Me. I just how they are not old enough to use different API calls :p

And please dont ask for 95 & NT4 support :)

Antonis

584933045[/snapback]

I said NT4 support if it was open-source, But I honestly wouldn't expect you or FlishFun to put effort into it, someone like me would do it instead.

OK, time for an update :)

1. AutoPatcher will continue as a closed-source project, despite the obvious interest in open source, mainly because of the following PM from

th3 pla6u3:

Subject: AutoPatcher's Source

I wondring if i can get this or somethign. The reason being is because a couple of frends and I wanted to make a proggy called AutoApper or soemthign. I would be glad to hsot things for you or something. The only reason I need the source is because I wanted to chage the interface of it. It would look tacky if it had auto patter on it insted of autoapper or something. ,I need to change the Pics an Naems in it if you havent figered that out yet,  I no how to mod the Db file. My aim s/n is [removed]., and my email is [removed]. Please contact me to gvie me teh source. Thaks

Matthew

So in other words, he wanted to create his own breed...

I don't mean to be rude by posting this out in public, but i believe it will help you understand why i decided to keep the source closed.

2. Develpment on AutoPatcher 5.0 is coming along nicely (actually, it's better than i thought)

The main program is now working fine (all the things seen in the first post about AutoPatche 5.0). Module-related procedures have been finished (even security measures). Unattended tier 2 is done (tiny window during installation). Actually, there's only a small list of things left to do...

3. ToDo list...

a. Write the resizing procedures

b. Disable X on titlebar during installation

c. Add a few more commandline arguments

d. General optimization

Stay tuned :)

Antonis

Btw, I have added support for all versions of Windows from 95 onwards. However, for 95/98/NT4 you will have to install VB6SP6 Runtime files (here) as well as Windows Script 5.6 (here), because they don't ship with them :(

/Raptor

Preview

If you want to see a preview of AutoPatcher 5.0 (with a couple of test modules), download the AutoPatcher 5.0 Test Package

Contents

1. AutoPatcher 5.0 (still under development)

2. AutoPatcher 5.0 Module Editor (in \tools folder - still needs a lot of work)

3. AutoPatcher 5.0 Module Installer (in \modules folder)

4. A few sample (test) modules.

/Raptor

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Can you give an example of when you would want to use Rufus over the other or vice versa? Just wondering which is the "best".
    • Oh no...the wallet is already screaming. So many games and so little time. Being old and responsible is awful!
    • LibreWolf 152.0.2-1 by Razvan Serea LibreWolf is an independent “fork” of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy security and user freedom. It is the community run successor to LibreFox. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. LibreWolf features: Latest Firefox — LibreWolf is compiled directly from the latest build of Firefox Stable. You will have the the latest features, and security updates. Independent Build — LibreWolf uses a build independent of Firefox and has its own settings, profile folder and installation path. As a result, it can be installed alongside Firefox or any other browser. No phoning home — Embedded server links and other calling home functions are removed. In other words, minimal background connections by default. User settings updates Extensions firewall: limit internet access for extensions. Multi-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac/and soon Android) Community-Driven Dark theme (classic and advanced) LibreWolf privacy features: Delete cookies and website data on close. Include only privacy respecting search engines like DuckDuckGo and Searx. Include uBlockOrigin with custom default filter lists, and Tracking Protection in strict mode, to block trackers and ads. Strip tracking elements from URLs, both natively and through uBO. Enable dFPI, also known as Total Cookie Protection. Enable RFP which is part of the Tor Uplift project. RFP is considered the best in class anti-fingerprinting solution, and its goal is to make users look the same and cover as many metrics as possible, in an effort to block fingerprinting techniques. Always display user language as en-US to websites, in order to protect the language used in the browser and in the OS. Disable WebGL, as it is a strong fingerprinting vector. Prevent access to the location services of the OS, and use Mozilla's location API instead of Google's API. Limit ICE candidates generation to a single interface when sharing video or audio during a videoconference. Force DNS and WebRTC inside the proxy, when one is being used. Trim cross-origin referrers, so that they don't include the full URI. Disable link prefetching and speculative connections. Disable disk cache and clear temporary files on close. Disable form autofill. Disable search and form history...and more. Download: LibreWolf 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: LibreWolf Home Page | Addons | Screenshot | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hands on with iFlyTek AINote 2 E-Ink tablet: insanely thin and smart by Taras Buria During Amazon Prime Day 2026, iFlyTek is offering its E-Ink tablets with big discounts. The AINOTE 2 is now available at 20% off, allowing you to save quite a lot on one of the thinnest E-Ink tablets out there. I was offered a chance to look at the device, so here are my impressions. The AINOTE 2 is a large 10.65-inch E-Ink tablet that strikes you the moment you take it out of the box. It is extremely thin. At just 4.2 mm, this tablet is at the edge of what is possible for a device with a USB Type-C port. It is also very light, which makes it comfortable and enjoyable during long reading sessions. The tablet has a gold metal chassis with the front and back made of plastic. The back also features four rubber feet that prevent it from sliding around your desk when writing. Besides a USB Type-C port and an LED indicator, there are two buttons mounted on the top edge: a power button with a built-in fingerprint scanner and a dedicated AI button. I would say the fingerprint scanner is quite mid. Given that iFlyTek positions the device as a digital notebook, it makes sense to have a biometric scanner to protect sensitive information. However, it is not the fastest fingerprint reader, and sometimes it fails to recognize my finger. I assume that is due to the tablet's insane thinness. A dedicated AI button is an interesting choice, especially in the middle of the top edge. I can see this button being useful for those who heavily rely on AI and use it frequently, but I cannot help but think its placement is impractical. Having it on one of the longer sides would make so much more sense. The AINOTE 2 is a very pretty device. Gold finish with thin chassis and nearly symmetrical front bezels create a fantastic combination, and iFlyTek cleverly hides the front chin with a section that looks like an extension of the screen, housing two touch-capacitive buttons: one for AI and one for quick notes. This section can also scroll pages when you swipe from the middle to the left or right. It is a cool idea, and very handy when you need to scroll tens of pages at once. AINOTE 2's elegant look extends from its exterior to its software. The user interface is very clean and not cluttered with an abundance of buttons. The tablet prioritizes the note-taking experience, and when you unlock it, it defaults to the list of all notes and folders. Additionally, there is a separate "Schedule" section with your calendar, tasks, memos, and other productivity features. You can connect your Outlook or Google account or use a local calendar. The tablet has quite a lot of AI features powered by OpenAI's GPT-5 and Google's Gemini 3. Besides a standard app with all your chats, you can invoke AI by pressing its dedicated button and dictating your request. It is not limited to just chats. It works with the built-in calendar, and you can tell it to create events, tasks, notes, and more. Additionally, AI features are integrated into the built-in notepad, allowing you to summarize notes, ask questions about your notes, and more. The tablet can OCR handwritten text in different languages (about 120 languages, which is very impressive), and it surprised me with very good accuracy. Voice note transcription is also available, including a "multiplayer" mode where the tablet detects each speaker. Unfortunately, the AINOTE 2 has no built-in speakers (even though it somehow makes a tapping noise when you flip pages using the Quick Bar), so the only way to listen to something is to connect a Bluetooth speaker or headphones. However, there are four front-facing mics for dictation, voice notes, AI chats, and more. Unfortunately, certain features require a Pro subscription that costs $5.99/mo or $59.99/year. Those include offline voice transcription, access to better AI models, the ability to edit notes on a PC or mobile app, and extended service coverage similar to Apple Care. It is a bummer to see yet another app, especially in a device that costs $649, but at least they give a free 90-day trial so that you can see if the benefits justify the price. As for the reader, it supports PDF, EPUB, TXT, MOBI, AZW3, DOC(X), XLS(X), PPT(X), JPEG, JPG, and PNG. The app is quite customizable, with features like text contrast/boldness/size adjustments, margins and spacing customization, and the ability to load custom fonts. Plus, you can annotate books with the stylus, add text notes, and use AI to work with them. Just keep in mind that most AI features require an active internet connection. Like with other E-Ink tablets with Android inside, you can load any other reader you want from the Google Play Store or a third-party source. Despite its hefty price tag of $629 or $519 by the time of publishing this article during Prime Day 2026, the AINOTE 2 has quite modest hardware inside. There is only 4 GB of RAM and about 42GB of storage. It is powered by the RockChip RK3576 processor with 8 cores at 2.2 GHz. Given that the tablet runs Android 14 and has Google Play, you can install Android apps, but do not expect much from this thing performance-wise. As for the battery, there is a 4,000 Li-Ion battery, which, on full charge, lasted me for about one week of active daily use of reading and note-taking. The screen has a resolution of 1920x2560 pixels, which equals 300 PPI, a perfect spot for a sharp, nice-to-read display. It supports EMR styluses that do not require charging, and I have to say that the note-taking experience on this tablet is fantastic. Stylus lag is nearly imperceivable, creating a very natural, paper-like feel. The stylus comes in the box (including two extra nibs), and it features an extra button for various actions and an eraser on top. It magnetically attaches to the tablet and stays safely secured. The stylus has a very nice coarse texture, and thanks to using Wacom tech, you can swap it for any other EMR pen if you wish. The AINOTE 2 has no front light, and because of that, the display sits very close to the screen surface, reducing the distance between the stylus tip/your finger and the display to a minimum. No front light is certainly an inconvenience in certain scenarios, but the screen makes up for that with a seriously impressive paper-like feel and writing experience. In dark conditions, you will have to find a lamp, but the good thing is that the screen has a solid anti-glare surface that diffuses light. The display has two modes: Crisp and Fast. Crisp ensures the image stays, well, crisp and sharp, while Fast speeds up refresh rate and response by toning down display resolution and making everything a bit more jagged. In my testing, I only used Fast mode when browsing the web for a much faster render time. The iFlyTek AINOTE is an impressive device, but it's not flawless. A few things disappointed me during a week of using it. Software localization has a bunch of not necessarily broken, but certainly awkward, machine-translated English. System navigation is not good, as there is no universal "Home" gesture. To go to the main page, you have to swipe up and then press the Home button from the multi-tasking window. There are many gestures for various actions, such as display cleanup, screenshot, undo/redo, but no back/forward or Home gestures. I really hate that the tablet won't let me update its software without creating an iFlyTek account first. Finally, privacy could be a concern for some, as most tablets' features require an active internet connection, an iFlyTek account, and sharing data when using AI. If you can overlook its quirks, some of which could be addressed with software updates (I received two with massive changelogs over a single week), and accept a $519 price tag (with a discount), you will be happy with the AINOTE 2. However, if you do not need that many AI features in an E-Ink reader or you want something a bit more affordable, you'd better look at cheaper competitors from BOOX or Amazon, such as the BOOX Go 10.3 Gen 2 or the Kindle Scribe, which is currently 24% off during Prime Day sales. Buy iFlyTek AINOTE 2 on Amazon - $519 | 20% off with Prime What I liked What I disliked Very impressive hardware Beautiful design Fantastic display with an EMR stylus Supports offline voice transcription Easy-to-use software Clever, useful, and well-made AI features A fingerprint scanner Very expensive Some features require a subscription Poor system navigation Mandates a user account No speakers Privacy could be a concern Note: iFlyTek provided the review unit without any editorial input or review guidance. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Look up "greed". If you are willing to buy that it's only inflation, I've got a bridge to sell you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      416
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      132
    4. 4
      Xenon
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!