Do LCD monitors affect vision?


Recommended Posts

A major difference between CRTs and LCDs is that LCDs don't flicker like CRTs do.  CRTs flicker 120 times per second (in north america, 100 times per second in the uk) due to the AC power cycle.  It's faster than our eyes can see, although if you record a CRT on video camera you'll see lines through it due to the flickering.  This doesn't happen on LCDs, as it's light is provided by DC power instead of an AC power.  As a result they are easier on your eyes.

584947434[/snapback]

Flickering has nothing to do with the AC Frequency. They are resulted from the refresh rate. In fact the internal circuitry of a CRT converts AC current to DC.

LCD has a few advantages over CRT but if you stare at the screen 1-2 hrs at a time, you're going to cause some harm to your eye. You need take a break every 20 - 30 mins whether you have LCD or crt

584947810[/snapback]

Really, I stare at my old cruddy CRT usually for more then 1-2 hours at a time; what harm can come from staring at an object for a few hours?

A major difference between CRTs and LCDs is that LCDs don't flicker like CRTs do.  CRTs flicker 120 times per second (in north america, 100 times per second in the uk) due to the AC power cycle.  It's faster than our eyes can see, although if you record a CRT on video camera you'll see lines through it due to the flickering.  This doesn't happen on LCDs, as it's light is provided by DC power instead of an AC power.  As a result they are easier on your eyes.

584947434[/snapback]

Heh.. close, but wrong. Monitors do not flicker because of the type of electrical current they take. They flicker because that's the way they were designed to draw images. And the AC power cycle in North America is 60 cycles per second, not 120--It's 120 VOLTS.

A CRT fires an electron beam at a grid of phosphors, starting at the top-left of the screen, going left-to-right, until it hits the bottom. The number of times the CRT can "re-paint" the screen in a second is called it's REFRESH RATE. The NTSC standard for televisions is to re-draw the screen 60 times per second, partly because that's fast enough to make static images look like they're actually moving, but mostly because electrical current in North America is supplied at the rate of 60Hz, so it was the logical choice to use when they invented TV.

The higher the refresh rate of a CRT display, the more fluid the image it displays, the less noticeable flicker due to the constant re-drawing, and the less strain on your eyes. You should set your refresh rate to the highest rate your monitor can support for each resolution without over-stressing it. If you use your monitor at it's threshold (making it redraw as fast as it can), it will slightly blur the image and shorthen it's lifespan. So if your monitor can support 120Hz at 800x600, then feel free to use 100Hz. If it can support 90Hz at 1280x960, then try 85Hz. Typically, you should aim for 75Hz or higher. 85Hz is a great point to aim for.

The reason LCDs don't "flicker", per se, is because they use a different technique than CRTs to display an image. LCDs don't heat up phosphors, instead they use two thin polarizing films with a layer of "liquid crystals" in between. The screen is broken up into a grid of tiny pixels with red/blue/green filters above them. A light shines continuously at the screen, and tiny transistors control the alignment of the liquid crystals in order to let light through or not.

LCDs don't flicker, because the images are always on the screen. They use a 60Hz refresh rate to simplify the electronics (ie. update once per cycle of electric input). HOWEVER you DO still have to take into account the response time of the particular LCD screen and it's effect on the update speed. This is similar to refresh rate, but has no effect on flicker because, again, the LCD screen is always on, no matter the refresh rate. Response time is important for quick-moving images, like in games, because although the electronics producing the display are using power at 60Hz, it cannot change the alignment of the crystals--thus changing the color of the output--faster than it's response time. 25ms per update = 40 updates per second, which is too slow for playing games. 16ms and 12ms response times better suited for that task.

REMEMBER if you stare at brick wall from same distance as you monitor and for the same period of time it will be bad for the eyes. Radiation and flickering are some concerns - but your eyes need movement too. Look at far distance once in a while for them to refocus.

thx Sticktron very good acknowledge :)

but i have 2 q:

1- its matter if you change the refresh rate for LCD through windows properties as its use tiny transistors to control the pixels ?

2- i love LCDs screen cause they have wonderful color, at least you can distinguish between the CRT and LCD it looks like natural colour and some people consider this as a good advantage over CRT

Heavy computer use is tied to Glaucoma...

Also, when you stare at a monitor you tend to blink less because of refresh rates and such, thus drying out your eyes, etc. That is also proven.

584947504[/snapback]

Atleast I get to smoke more :laugh:

I use my LCD for about 6 hours everyday, except weekends where its about 12 hours straight since we have LAN Parties every weekend.. :wacko:

Edited by Khaki72nd
Same here, 60hz kills my eyes and gives me a massive headache.

584947754[/snapback]

wow u know alot about this stuff, anyways, i changed it to 70hz, iwas at 60 in the beginning :| can u believe it? i was used to it from so long anyways, now im on 70 Hz...on 800x600 res...i also heard about the color quality? i heard u shoulden't have it on 32 bit if u dont play games, etc and it hurts ur eyes? does it?

edit: i gotta get a lcd now ;( any recommendations for a cheap one? i have only about $300 :(]

Hi all

So.... its about LCD vs CRT eh? heh heh, thats a fun topic :)

I love both, for different reasons.. I think my 21" Sony's better than a LCD screen lol

The refresh rate on a LCD screen does nothing - that i've ever noticed. Anyone feel free to correct this one, but i'm sure it has no effect (??)

The refresh on a CRT should be set as high as it can go without your monitor screwing up true - If you're going to tape it, I found that 75hz is the best rate for PAL users.. NTSC is different, so I couldn't tell you there.

(why tell you that? well uhhm.... taping drunken quake players is one excuse :D lol)

Also : If you're going to get an LCD - dont use it.

Seriously! *MANY* are rated between 10,000 -> 30,000 hours of use... Thats not a lot when you start to think about it.... I mean, I use my monitor a lot.... I've never noticed a CRT "Wearing out" in 3 years heh heh ;)

Anyway, my 20 cents worth!

and i cant say i've seen a tft ever wear out either. i mean by the time my tft does die i'll prob have another 2 of them sitting here and i dont even have a source of income atm.

Seriously I've been sitting here with a tft for 2 years now running 12 hrs a day and it's still as good as the day i got it - well bar 1 dead unnoticable pixel

And as for gaming - i've never once seen bluring in any fast moving games and this is a 25ms rated monitor

and yeh there so much easier on the eyes - i find it difficcult / distracting using machines with crt's these days - especially at school - it just really annoys me

i thikn my eye sight is getting worse and worse, and i want it to stop..but i cant really avoid computers because i do all my work on them (hmwk, etc) and stuff..I dont have $400+ but i think i have around $300 so any decent lCd/crt monitors for that much in canada? [ont]

584947375[/snapback]

if your eyesight is getting worse, then you need to see an eye doctor. if you have an underlying issue, then the doctor will help you on that.

search this site for some deals.

A major difference between CRTs and LCDs is that LCDs don't flicker like CRTs do.  CRTs flicker 120 times per second (in north america, 100 times per second in the uk) due to the AC power cycle.  It's faster than our eyes can see, although if you record a CRT on video camera you'll see lines through it due to the flickering.  This doesn't happen on LCDs, as it's light is provided by DC power instead of an AC power.  As a result they are easier on your eyes.

584947434[/snapback]

The "flickering" is not caused by the frequency of the Power source, Ity is caused because the electron gun doesn't paint 5the whole screen at one time, instead it goes pixel by pixel scanning the whole screen in some sort of "zig-zag" way, you can adjust the frequency of that "refresh" in WinXP in the Monitor settinfgs on advanced tab, the more the frequency the best. My CRT can run @ 1280*720 but it locks me at 60 hz, and when i am at 60hz i get headaches thats why i do 1024*768@85hz. so if you are getting headaches by using CRT, just cranck up the refresh rate or get a better one refresh-rate wise

And as for gaming - i've never once seen bluring in any fast moving games and

this is  a 25ms rated monitor

somehow i dont belive it. playing on a samsung 25ms lcd after my crt was horrible the first few minutes. all blurry. you do however adjust very quickly and dont seem to notice it anymore - which is what happend to you

Normally windows defaults to 60Hz for compatability with most types of monitors however i makes my eyes go all O_o just staring at it.

Most average people's computer systems i've used are set to 60Hz which drives me crazy, even computer labs at school are all set to 60Hz.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I recently tried edge. It seems a lot better. A lot of the junk in it is gone. It seems less bloated and snappy.
    • Lethal fake phone chargers are still being sold on Amazon and eBay, UK watchdog warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels The UK consumer rights organization, Which?, is claiming that “potentially lethal knock-off chargers” are still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after it exposed the danger of these chargers. In its latest investigation, it bought 15 USB phone chargers from several online marketplaces and found they were missing key information, meaning they cannot be legally sold in the UK. Which? bought the 15 chargers from seven online marketplaces. These were Amazon (including Amazon Haul), AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace, Debenhams Marketplace, and eBay. It said that the chargers were so badly made that anyone using them was at risk of electric shock. Over half the chargers also posed fire and explosion risks. Of the chargers purchased, one was a fake Apple USB-C 35W power adaptor charger. To confuse buyers, the box was branded with an Apple logo, but testing found it to be a fake. Further testing picked up arcing sounds after 10 seconds of use, where a current jumps between two parts of the electrical circuit, which can cause fires, explosions, or electric shock. The manufacturers of this particular charger also put modeling clay inside it to make it feel more weighty, robust, and genuine. Not all of the chargers were technically faulty; however, some were missing key packaging, markings, and documentation, meaning they can’t be sold in the UK legally. Which? said that it is now campaigning alongside a coalition of safety groups and businesses for new laws that make online marketplaces responsible for ensuring the safety of products that they choose to list on their websites. It also said the government needs to start using powers under the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which was adopted last July, to impose safety requirements on online marketplaces via secondary legislation, but so far, there have been delays. No matter what country you are in, be sure to properly research what you are buying and only buy authentic chargers to prevent fires. You can read more about Which?’s research here.
    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
    • This AdGuard Family lifetime deal is still only $15.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • the MCT currently downloads 26200.8653, so not completely up to date.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      175
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!