PC Gamers: Refusal to buy consoles


Recommended Posts

I have a ps2 with GTA:SA (had it since Vice City), and I've hardly touched it. I just don't like playing on a blurry low-res TV with 5 year old hardware. I barelly played Vice when it came out on ps2, but when it was on PC I enjoyed it a lot more, less fiddly controls and better graphics.

I prefer a mouse and keyboard to a controller, it's probably what I'm used to. A controller is just awkward for anything other than a platformer/sports sim

Plus you can mod PC games and play them online. (granted, console games are now looking pretty tempting due to the inbuilt HDD's and onlineplay options.. make them properly HDTV compatible and we'll be set)

Consoles do have their place though, for a quick mindless game with friends when they come over.

is this thread still going on?!?!?

i think we've established that its not that we refuse to buy 'em and that there are very valid points for us not buying consoles, just as some of us like and/or prefer consoles

its not how we like to play.... its the fact that we're bunch of boring C*NTS with nothing better to do than sit around and play games thats important!! :p lol

I just had had a thought after reading a few posts by PC gamers wondering about the PC release of GTA: San Andreas.

It seems to happen fairly often when a great game comes out for a console (GTA, MGS2, Final Fantasy, Silent Hill, etc. etc.).  PC Gamers say, "When's it coming out for PC?"  "Why doesn't 'so-and-so' make a PC version?" and other such comments that show a distress over a game not being released for Windows.

A question to you PC gamers.  Why is it you'll spend hundreds upon hundreds for PC upgrades so you can play the newest PC game, but refuse to drop so much as $120 for a preowned console to play the newest PS2, GCN or XBOX game?  You'll buy new memory and a new video card so you can play Half-Life 2 the second it comes out, but at the same time, you complain that not enough of the great console games are released for PC.

Just today I saw a post about someone saying how he's just going to have to wait a year for the PC version of GTA: San Andreas.  If he wants to play it so much, is $120 or even less for a preowned PS2 really too high a price to play the game now?

I just hope it's not due to some kind of "PC is better than consoles" fanboy attitude, because if the game isn't going to come out on PC, that argument doesn't hold much water.

Just curious.

584959717[/snapback]

Because I can do much more thing with my PC than with a console. Like :

1- Desk work;

2- Easyer for multiplayer gaming;

3- Emulation;

4- Warez;

5- Movies;

6- Pr0n;

...

7-6- and s on,...

ABC and a half!

im a gamer since my parents bought me an intellivision back when i was a kid. since then i had nes, snes, genesis, gamegear, virtualboy, gameboy, tg16, suprgrafx16, ps1,gamecube and pc. no need to just stick with a pc or console only. if you do that you'll miss out on some really good games. great games are on pc and great games are on all 3 consoles.

  • 7 months later...
My favorite genre is RPGs, and quite frankly, the vast majority of PC RPGs I've played have sucked- a lot. I'm just not a fan of the style. I get bored of MMORPGs in three minutes. Console ones, on the other hand, are fun and engaging- take Star Ocean, Final Fantasy, or Xenosaga as examples.

i will disagree with that some of my fav. RPGs are for PC, the 1st 3 fallouts ok that is about all the RPG i have but i love them. the truth my mom cant speen $500 to upgrade a computer. my computer is ok, it cant play alot of the console games. my graphics arent that great and my xbox Hard drive is better then my computer harddrive. the PC have 1 thing that a console doesnt have i can get maps mods and other thing without doing much. games like star craft,AOE's, and my fallouts. i dont like joysticks, the mouse is sh*tty when it comes to FPS games.

I just had had a thought after reading a few posts by PC gamers wondering about the PC release of GTA: San Andreas.

It seems to happen fairly often when a great game comes out for a console (GTA, MGS2, Final Fantasy, Silent Hill, etc. etc.).  PC Gamers say, "When's it coming out for PC?"  "Why doesn't 'so-and-so' make a PC version?" and other such comments that show a distress over a game not being released for Windows.

A question to you PC gamers.  Why is it you'll spend hundreds upon hundreds for PC upgrades so you can play the newest PC game, but refuse to drop so much as $120 for a preowned console to play the newest PS2, GCN or XBOX game?  You'll buy new memory and a new video card so you can play Half-Life 2 the second it comes out, but at the same time, you complain that not enough of the great console games are released for PC.

Just today I saw a post about someone saying how he's just going to have to wait a year for the PC version of GTA: San Andreas.  If he wants to play it so much, is $120 or even less for a preowned PS2 really too high a price to play the game now?

I just hope it's not due to some kind of "PC is better than consoles" fanboy attitude, because if the game isn't going to come out on PC, that argument doesn't hold much water.

Just curious.

584959717[/snapback]

My reasons for preferring PC gaming over console gaming:

Shorter load time.

Better graphics

FREE online play on 90% of games (no ?$? xbox live crap)

PATCHES!!! (PS2/GC cannot give you patches!)

Game Mods! (How much fun is garrys mod for HL2?! this does not happen on PS2 GC or Xbox!)

Higher Resolution! - who wants to play at 480i/p when you can play at 1080i/p with DX9.0c ???

Cheaper - PC games hit the market cheaper HL2 + CSS = ?30 (on day 1) average PS2/Xbox game ?45.00 on day one.

ok so lets recap cheaper better performance better graphics online play shorter load time and large communitys supplying mods and mini games for our favourite titles. these things make PC gaming much better.

I respect everyone's point of view, but please explain this to me, I don't mean to flame, my questions will be just that, objective questions waiting to be answered, as I'm only looking for enlightnment:

90% of the best and most influential games ever have come out on computer.

584959867[/snapback]

Are you sure about that? What about Mario, Zelda (specially OOT), Metroid, etc, which have spawned helluva lot of games? Could you please list some of those games you mention?

Then there're the first party titles, that will never be released on PC, no matter how much people whine about it.

584959979[/snapback]

I second that.

2) i want the best, best graphics, best gameplay, best sound (and consoles can't provide that)

584960312[/snapback]

I'll give you graphics and sound, but how can consoles not be able to have the best gameplay? Please don't say it's the keyboard/mouse, cause that's just preference, and applies to some types of games. Personally, I can't play comfortably with a keyboard/mouse, and trust me, I've tried, and the result was Deus Ex collecting dust in my room, no matter how good the game is.

Mouse/Keyboard>Controller.. only reason I play on PC alot more than consoles.

584960340[/snapback]

Well, controllers are molded for your hands, plus they are a lot more confortable and intuitive. Keyboards ARE better for some games, but for most of them, a controller is better, otherwise they would have never released controllers for PC.

*Realizes this is a very old thread* But... in reply to the original topic and all, people want that PC version because they like using their thousand dollar PCs which can run such games much better than consoles can. Look at the amount of quality PC games that are basically PC-only, and have incredible graphics and gameplay because of it. Now, I know such high profile games like Doom 3 and Half-Life 2 have (or are getting) their own respective console versions. However, no matter what you say, they are just stripped-down versions of their PC bigger brothers. The controls generally don't fare well in the move, nor the graphics. Now, the same can be said for Console to PC ports, but the reason for this is more laziness on the developers parts rather than an actual hardware limitation. Now this may be different for awhile when the next gen consoles come out, but it wont last.

You also have to realize a console setup can be just as expensive as a PC. Factor in a high-end TV (HDTV or otherwise...), a speaker setup, the console + cables, games, controllers, memory cards, etc... I mean, it does come out to a helluva lot unless you already happen to have that TV or speakers... Now, in my case, I already have everything I need in my PC, which can also multitask and do a lot more than any console can. I will therefore logically stick with my somewhat expensive PC, at least until new consoles are released and I get an interest in them.

The only thing holding back computer gaming is the game developers unwillingness to develop for the PC. Examples? Well, ever seen a current-gen Nintendo game on the PC (not including console emulators, of course...). Halo 2 even? Sure, they COULD run on PCs, but consoles are easier to develop for (less variables included) so they stick with what is easy, not minding the obvious bottleneck in quality that they are entering.

I have nothing AGAINST consoles though, and I fully intend to buy at least one of the next gen consoles.

Because I can play a game and quit and do something else. On a console I have to quit the game and go over to the pc and then do stuff. I like the all in one factor.

Plus, when I think of consoles I think of kids and teenagers. Also no mouse and keyboard. And if it did have one it would still be too much trouble, for me anyway.

I just don't like them in general, to be honest I hope they burn in hell. You did want honesty right?

ok, the reasons I am not going to get a console to play one game, but spend 100 bucks on new ram to play BF2 is....

1. Mouse/Keyboard >> Controller (for FPS mosly...but I mostly play FPS games)

2. I have no TV... ($300 for one that is worth playing games on)

3. I do however, have a top 10, 19" CRT monitor (according to PC world, as compared to other ones in the same generation)

4. PS2 can't run Trillian for when I am not gaming. (wait, is there linux for any of the consoles? I dunno....but you can't type with a dual shock controller :p )

5. The massive sub that is sitting beside my feet doesn't work to well with a TV

6. No Xbox live fees to play online.

Well I too am locked into the PS2 for my anime needs. i upgrade my pc to stay in the loop of the technology cycle. I learnt this lesson a long time ago. You fall too far behind you gotta restart from scratch again. Besides that I need to have control of game settings right down to video settings and audio. I've seen to many xbox games stutter alot because you couldn't turn down a certain aspect of texture control or view distance.

Either way i buy them for the kick of it I mostly play the games from ntsc-j ;)

Console are kinda limiting for me. My arguments are, PC allows more genre to be played rather than console.

For example, rts games like StarCraft, WarCraft series. Try playing that on a console, even with the keyboard or mouse add on. It would just be a pc gaming in a console form. If i want to play football games like EA Fifa, i can just plug in a joypad and enjoy it like i would on a console.

Downside on pc is, you have to spend some hefty sum for upgrades. Since most i believe, use computers to get their work done, i would say the upgrade is worthwhile.

584959959[/snapback]

I'm thinking this: for upgrading, you really only have to spend 100 bucks on a graphics card to play a game and make it look like it does on a PS2/XBOX. They are low powered machines. If you want to crank up the quality to max on a PC of course you have to spend more, but on consoles it's always that limitation of graphics/performance trade-off. There isn't many good games that come out for PC... there is maybe one good game every 6 months or so, and it is sometimes a long wait. For consoles there are tons of games left and right, but they aren't as breathtaking as the PC games. You have a computer anyways, and it's fun to upgrade even though it's pricey.

Basically, for the moddability, online gameplay, and updates.

Plus, some of us spend $2000 and many hours building/tweaking the rig, so it'll be satisfying to get a game that can show its full potential (and of course, its upgradable also) ;)

And one word: keyboard :D

Here is my take..

I have played many games on my PC. There are few games that I have put many hours in.

Diablo, all UT, Doom 3, and some old school RPGS back in the day. Civ & Red Alert.

While it is true all the PC versons of games that I have for the PS2 or xbox look better on my computer. The reason I own a PS2 & xbox is the PC doesn't offer as many options as consoles do.

Any person who claims to be a gamer and likes RPG is high on crack if they think PC's offer better titles RPG wise.

I refuse to play FPS games on Ps2 And Xbox becuase I am way faster with a keyboard and mouse then a controller. That and the games are smoother and play better especially in a real multiplayer invornment.

And if your a fan of fighting games good luck with your PC. You'll probably never play Tekken or Soul Calibur. And it's truly a shame your missing out on all the great games you have missed out on becuase you think the console market has nothing to offer you.

Meanwhile I'll go back to my computer that can play every game yours can play and if i should choose I can play and of my Ps2 xbox or the other handfull of consoles i own.

I do own an Xbox (i bought it mainly for Halo 2). However i still prefer the pc version of games to the xbox version (i.e. Halo 1). The mouse and keyboard a much easier to controll than the xbox controller (at least in fps games, my favorite). Maybe its from all those years of pc gaming, but i just cant get the hang of the gamepad as well as i can the mouse/keyboard combo

I haven't owned a console since the original playstation debuted.  I'm NOT a console gamer, 90% of the best and most influential games ever have come out on computer.

Consoles are mainly for the people that dont want to bother with the technical knowhow of computers, they want something they can just drop in and play.

Any game thats worth its salt that has come out on the console, ALWAYS comes out on PC, but not visa-versa.

584959867[/snapback]

exactly, and you can do so much more on the PC (download mods, maps, updates). Its actually fun to work around your computer and make it something that you can show off to your buds. everyone else already has a PS2

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!