HL2 / CS:S - Instructions To Enable DirectX 9.0


Recommended Posts

Enabling DirectX 9.0 for Half-Life 2 (HL2) & Counter-Strike: Source (CS:S)

- Load up Steam

- Play Games

- Right-Click the game, "Properties"

- Launch Options

- Add the line "-dxlevel ##" (without the quotes but you DO need the dash '-')

Where ##:

90 for DirectX 9.0

81 for DirectX 8.1

80 for DirectX 8.0

70 for DirectX 7.0

Source: CS:S Official Forum

* You will need a DirectX 9.0 capable graphics card in order to use the full effects. But hey, it works for me :)

  Rogue` said:
Doesnt it use the Dx path ur hardware supports already?  I mean i have a 9800XT....so wont it already use dx9?

584965299[/snapback]

Unfortunately no, at least I don't think so. I think I read somewhere that somone has the X800 Pro and it only let's them use DirectX 8.1

You can check in-game, go to:

- Options

- Video

- Advanced

You should see the "Hardware DirectX" disabled and set at DX8.1. This fix sets it to DX9.0, but have a look before you add the command line and see what your level is at present.

  spiffy0517 said:
for nvidia users. good luck with your performance :x

584965304[/snapback]

ATi fanboy obviously. I'm using "Nvidia GeForce FX Go5700" and I have excellent performance, no lag (HL2/CS:S) and no errors whatsoever. So please keep ATi/Nvidia comments to yourself because this thread is about DX not GPU Preferences.

  Rogue` said:
Well i dont need to use that command, in advanced video options it says Dx9 for Software and Hardware :)

584965366[/snapback]

Nice, as long as it works on your card - however, as you say, DX8.1 gives you better performance:FPS (Frames Per Second), so you could use this technique to downgrade the hardware to DX8.1 - unless you'd prefer the visual enhancements.

If you have an Nvidia card and plan to use directx 9, know that it was not enabled by default for a reason. I tried it with the CS:S beta only, but back then I went from a playable framerate to, well... not playable at all by switching to directx 9. It totally depends on your card I guess, but this is just a warning to expect a major performance hit.

i tried this last week on the CSS stress test w/ my 5900 and i lost ~15fps on the same settings when enabling DX9... not worth it visually for the performance hit. also, i too lost the water reflections which is important to me... im going to try this today w/ some HL2 demos to see the effects... then i'll decide if it's worth it or not (probably not)

  PukiMan said:
I really don't see the difference

without -dxlevel 90:

DX9.jpg

with -dxlevel 90:

DX9a.jpg

Are you sure HL2 don't use DX9 on default?

And in the process of taking the screenshots, I learned those things (The flying bugs that come from the ground) can't swim :D

584968498[/snapback]

I guess that's 2 times dx9, did you add -dxlevel 81 to go back to directx 8.1?

I've put it on 8.1 to test and it looks different

  icecream said:
I guess that's 2 times dx9, did you add -dxlevel 81 to go back to directx 8.1?

I've put it on 8.1 to test and it looks different

584968869[/snapback]

-dxlevel 81:

DX81.jpg

-dxlevel 80:

DX80.jpg

Nothing, no difference at all.

Tryed to do the command in the console and is said thats the command in incorrect.

I think the command is wrong.

You have to do it via Steam's Launch Options.....

Open Steam, click on Play Games, Right click on the game and click Properties, then click on Launch Options and add -dxlevel 81 or -dxlevel 80...

There IS a difference...in Dx81 u will NOT get reflections on water....i will go do a couple of screens :p

K, i have 9600XT and stutters a little now and again, would like to boost fps, so what command can i put in to make mine use Directx 8.1 or whatever would boost my fps?

And the graphics detail loss wouldn't be too substantial?

Thanks mateys.

(Slight noob in this category)

  Kerm said:
K, i have 9600XT and stutters a little now and again, would like to boost fps, so what command can i put in to make mine use Directx 8.1 or whatever would boost my fps?

And the graphics detail loss wouldn't be too substantial?

Thanks mateys.

(Slight noob in this category)

584969292[/snapback]

Thats the Audio Stutter people are complaining about....they said there should be a patch out by tomorrow....

Even if u do tweak the sh1t out of it...u will still get it :/ Just sit tight...only another day to wait for the fix :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I can tell you I don't need one. I use Start11 to make it Win10 styled and custom game tiles so it's essentially an easier way to launch games than opening Steam but I definitely don't 'need' it and don't use it to launch any applications.
    • I was replying to a user comment that literally started with "So, user error then."
    • Is the Start menu in Windows actually useful? Do we even need it? by Usama Jawad A few days ago, I shared my viewpoint regarding how Microsoft hasn't been able to convince me to migrate to Windows 11 as my sole daily driver, despite the OS being available for roughly four years. Within that piece, I highlighted the fact that even though the Start menu has been completely revamped in the latest version of Windows, it's not something that I use regularly. And that got me thinking: is the Start menu really a crucial piece of my Windows experience? I get it, I know that the Start menu is an iconic Windows element that has existed in the operating system for as long as many of us can remember. And yet, I can't really tell you about the last time I actually used the Start menu. The reason for italicizing the word "used" above is that while the Start menu can be launched when you click on the Windows icon in the Taskbar or the Windows key, I am not counting that as actual usage for the purpose of this piece. This is because I do launch the Start menu several times a day, I actually use it to get to Windows Search. I don't actually use the list of apps, app folders, and recently opened files. I simply tap the Windows key and start typing the search query for the item that I am looking for. For example, if I want to open Power BI, I don't open the Start menu and find the pinned app. I just tap on the Windows key and start typing "Po..." and quickly hit Enter as soon as the right option comes up, which is usually after a couple of keystrokes. Similarly, if I want to open "Gifts.xlsx", I don't open Excel from the Start menu or even peruse my list of recently opened files, I just start typing "Gi..." and press Enter. I feel like this is a much faster experience and you don't need to rely on muscle memory to find the item that you are looking for. And as your list of installed software grows, it only becomes more tedious to keep track of where you pinned an app or the folder that you kept it in. Windows Search gets rid of that problem completely. Additionally, the Start menu detracts me from whatever else I may be focusing on in parallel. If I am using Word and now want to open PowerPoint, I would probably get distracted by the Start menu as I launch it and try to locate the PowerPoint icon. Instead, I can just get to PowerPoint within a few keystrokes without even realizing the effort involved. I'd also like to highlight that I am not inherently against the idea of pinning stuff that you use frequently or recently, but I do think that the Taskbar and Desktop view already solves that problem to some extent. Right now, my Taskbar contains my most used software, while my desktop contains other secondary software and files. I understand that people have their fair share of complaints against Windows Search, but it works quite well for my use-cases. As it currently stands, my actual usage of the Start menu is nil. And although this popular Windows UX is always the subject of debate each time Microsoft makes even a minor change to it, I simply couldn't care less. That said, while the Start menu in its traditional use is dead to me, I am not sure how many people actively utilize this UX. Any evidence I have is purely anecdotal, but I would be very interested in seeing the telemetry that Microsoft tracks regarding its usage. Seeing how frequently Microsoft makes changes to the Start menu and the ensuing debate that follows, I feel like I am in the minority. But I just can't imagine opening the Start menu and then relying on muscle memory or a fixed grid of icons to get to the app I need, when I can do more with a couple of keystrokes.
    • >Fixed: Certain displays might be unexpectedly green. I believe that this fixed the Windows mishandling Dolby Vision issue in RGB 12 bit Full mode we saw recently.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Wayne Robinson earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      MikeK13 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      681
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      277
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      208
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      172
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      142
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!