Recommended Posts

Hello everybody!

I finally managed to register a Neowin account (www.spymac.com didn't seem to receive the registration mail ;) ), so here I am!

I've checked the Linux and Open Source boards several times already, and I quite like it in here! (well, so far!)

The Linux distributions I've given a try so far...

1. Knoppix (doesn't run too well on a PII 64 Mb RAM)

2. Damn Small Linux (lovely!)

3. VectorLinux (still on there)

4. Linux From Scratch (heh... isn't quite progressing)

I don't know all that much about Linux yet (some basic commands, and stuff), but I intend to do a stage 1 Gentoo install as soon as I get myself a laptop :-P

So, that's it about me.

How about you guys?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/249356-just-another-linux-user/
Share on other sites

I don't know all that much about Linux yet (some basic commands, and stuff), but I intend to do a stage 1 Gentoo install as soon as I get myself a laptop :-P

584992682[/snapback]

Your quite mad. A stage 3 is hard enough for newbies and you want to jump right in wish the sharks wearing a steak suit...ok.

You wont notice that much of a speed gain from stage 1 to stage 3. It takes a loooong time and isnt worth it. All you are going to do is waste your time and end up with nothing. Master stage 3 and then work down...

Stage 2 actually isnt that much harder but adds extra time in comparison. Dont put yourself through needless punishment. Use flags and cflags dont net you THAT much of a speed increase. Having a 6 page make.conf isnt going to turn your PII into a P4.

My opinion on a full Gentoo install (compiling everything possible from source) is that it is:

  • Well Documented.
  • Possibly a way to learn, if you learn by typing in what is written in front of you.
  • Going to take a long time on a slower processor. (actually, it takes quite a while on a fast processor)
  • Marginally faster to run, if you set it properly (may be kind of tough to do)
  • Quite likely to not be worth it
  • A rite of passage for many Linux users (like, "why climb that mountain?" - "because it's there!")

Now, take those items with a large grain of salt. I have never installed Gentoo. I see what it is about and have decided it isn't worth it for me. It may be an exercise that you want to do. It certainly cannot hurt to give it a try.

Completely without disrespect but how can you have an a concise opinion of something if you have never tried it. I can say I dont like slack or ubuntu but I have never used them. For me to list off criteria on what is wrong with them and what is right is pointless as it is all founded on ignorance.

I mean some of your points are rather detailed: " Marginally faster to run, if you set it properly (may be kind of tough to do)". I am wondering how you could possibly know--enough to give advice on--if you have never used it...

Grain of salt or not, I am sure you are just excited to help, but maybe some more prudence should be used--I am not going to walk into a room and start telling neurologists how the brain works...

This is coming from a Gentoo user.

True.

But I have taken a look at some of the documentation. It is very well-written, and has a renowned reputation for being excellent. (as others who have installed Gentoo are also often quick to say how friendly and helpful online help in the Gentoo IRC channels are, as well)

Will it take long time to compile and install. Without a doubt.

Is it marginally faster? Many sources say so. However, I have not seen anything showing that there is a significant improvement in performance over say someone who properly sets up a Debian box.

The original poster has tried an LFS, and says it "isn't quite progressing". In my opinion, Gentoo probably isn't going to be what he wants. I may very well be wrong on this (as I have been wrong a great many times!), so that is why I say that "it certainly cannot hurt to give it a try".

True.

But I have taken a look at some of the documentation.  It is very well-written, and has a renowned reputation for being excellent.  (as others who have installed Gentoo are also often quick to say how friendly and helpful online help in the Gentoo IRC channels are, as well)

Will it take long time to compile and install.  Without a doubt.

Is it marginally faster?  Many sources say so.  However, I have not seen anything showing that there is a significant improvement in performance over say someone who properly sets up a Debian box.

The original poster has tried an LFS, and says it "isn't quite progressing".  In my opinion, Gentoo probably isn't going to be what he wants.  I may very well be wrong on this (as I have been wrong a great many times!), so that is why I say that "it certainly cannot hurt to give it a try".

584994816[/snapback]

Okay, I've forgotten a fase in my plans, and it apparently shouldn't have been forgotten :huh:

Before I do a Gentoo install, I first want to set up Arch Linux. When I get used to that, I'll give gentoo a try.

Now, that changes the entire idea a lot, doesn't it?

LFS is really not that hard, by the way. If I don't encounter any errors, it's possible to finish it.

My problem is: when I do encounter an error, I don't know what to do about it.

I can ask on a forum, but I'll probably get the answer 'RTFM!'.

I'm not asking anyone for help on my LFS installation. It wouldn't be fair to bug other people about something like that, when you're still too much of a newbie.

I don't expect a Gentoo installation to go that well, but I'm sure it's possible, even for a newbie.

I've seen the manual, and it's amazingly clear how you're supposed to do each step.

(as others who have installed Gentoo are also often quick to say how friendly and helpful online help in the Gentoo IRC channels are, as well)

584994816[/snapback]

Man, #gentoo on freenode is a nightmare. It's so busy in there that half the requests for help and guidance get washed away and forgotten. I used to hang around there and try to help people, but it really isn't practical... its just far, far too busy.

The forums rock, however, being probably the best linux support resource on the planet.

Installing gentoo is a rite of passage in the Linux world. I don't know how practical it is to use as those long compile times certainly aren't for everyone. I tried using it for about a year - and in that time I encountered many packages that simply wouldn't compile correctly. I ended up moving to Debian because I just wanted something that worked. LFS is a bigger rite of passage than gentoo though. The only problem with these is that they both tend to teach you much more about installing LFS and installing Gentoo than they do about using Linux in general - so even if you do complete the install process, you still find yourself at the end of the day with a lot of unanswered questions.

But as I said, at least it shows you have the balls for a challenge.

GJ

Why not give Arch 7.0 a try. It is fast, reliable, has pacman wich installs and resolves dependencies, possible to build from scratch and very good forums with experts helping all the way. I have tried Gentoo, Slackware, Debian, RedHat, Suse, name them all. Arch is the system for me. :yes:

Why not give Arch 7.0 a try. It is fast, reliable, has pacman wich installs and  resolves dependencies, possible to build from scratch and very good forums with experts helping all the way. I have tried Gentoo, Slackware, Debian, RedHat, Suse, name them all. Arch is the system for me. :yes:

584997088[/snapback]

I mentioned that a few posts below the top post ;-) I'm going to try Arch before giving Gentoo a try.

Does Arch have a default WM? If so, what is it?

I find gentoo pretty awesome, but not for a newbie linux user, it took me a good day to fully complete the install and have a working X setup.

Try something like ubuntu, I gave it a quick look here at work, the install looked easy & with debian package management you can't go wrong :)

I find gentoo pretty awesome, but not for a newbie linux user, it took me a good day to fully complete the install and have a working X setup.

Try something like ubuntu, I gave it a quick look here at work, the install looked easy & with debian package management you can't go wrong :)

585030647[/snapback]

Agreed.

Or, if you are dead set on a gentoo system, how about vidalinux? Gentoo install without the headaches.

I'll see, folks ;-)

Just relax.

If I can't work with Gentoo, I'll use something else.

I'm not gonna go back to windows, I can assure you!

Now if only I would get a laptop, so I could install Linux.

Vectorlinux on an old computer... Well, it's better than nothing :-P Too bad I don't have internet access on that one :cry:

Do a Gentoo Stage 1. It shouldnt be hard for anyone (the documentation is great) it will just take ages on your hardware to compile gcc and and anything else.

I did a Stage 2 install as my first Linux distro about a year and a half ago. Now when I need to put Gentoo on a system I use Stage 1. Optimized for my hardware perfectly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Zen Browser 1.21b by Razvan Serea Zen Browser is a privacy-focused, open-source web browser built on Mozilla Firefox, offering users a secure and customizable browsing experience. It emphasizes privacy by blocking trackers, ads, and ensuring your data isn't collected. With Zen Mods, users can enhance their browser experience with various customization options, including features like split views and vertical tabs. The browser is designed for efficiency, providing fast browsing speeds and a lightweight interface. Zen Browser prioritizes user control over the browsing experience, offering a minimal yet powerful alternative to traditional web browsers while keeping your online activity private. Zen Browser’s DRM limitation Zen Browser currently lacks support for DRM-protected content, meaning streaming services like Netflix and HBO Max are inaccessible. This is due to the absence of a Widevine license, which requires significant costs and is financially unfeasible for the developer. Additionally, applying for this license would require Zen to be part of a larger company, similar to Mozilla or Brave. Therefore, DRM-protected media won't be supported in Zen Browser for the foreseeable future. Zen Browser offers features that improve user experience, privacy, and customization: Privacy-Focused: Blocks trackers and minimizes data collection. Automatic Updates: Keeps the browser updated with security patches. Zen Mods: Customizable themes and layouts. Workspaces: Organize tabs into different workspaces. Compact Mode: Maximizes screen space by minimizing UI elements. Zen Glance: Quick website previews. Split Views: View multiple tabs in the same window. Sidebar: Access bookmarks and tools quickly. Vertical Tabs: Manage tabs vertically. Container Tabs: Separate browsing sessions. Fast Profile Switcher: Switch between profiles easily. Tab Folders: Organize tabs into folders. Customizable UI: Personalize browser interface. Security Features: Inherits Firefox’s robust security. Fast Performance: Lightweight and optimized for speed. Zen Mods Customization: Deep customization with mods. Quick Access: Easy access to favorite websites. Open Source: Built on Mozilla Firefox with community collaboration. Community-Driven: Active development and feedback from users. GitHub Repository: Contribute and review the source code. Zen Browser 1.21b changelog: New Features Updated to Firefox 151.0.4 Added 'Space Routing', a new feature that allows you to route links to a specific Space. To get started, click on the three dots in your Space name and click on 'Space Routing Settings'. Fixes Fixed extension-opened tabs not being created with the correct container (#14100) Fixed a bug with the Boosts editor having the wrong theme colors (#14099) Improved overflowing space icons being inaccessible and improved the feeling when hovering over them (#13747) Other minor bug fixes and improvements Download: Zen Browser | 89.8 MB (Open Source) Download: Zen Browser ARM64 | Other Operating Systems View: Zen Browser Home Page | Screenshots 1 | 2 | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I am currently using a 4tb stick in combination with a 4tb 9100 Pro. It's only been six months since I bought them but the 990 has already dropped 1% health. Fingers crossed it doesn't go any lower.
    • But it opens the floodgates to anyone who gets a refund instead of a replacement (since refund will buy you a 1/3rd of the capacity it did years ago)
    • He has planned to file a lawsuit in small claims court so it'll only be a $1000 lesson assuming he wins. That's likely a fraction of what Samsung spends on toilet paper on a daily basis.
    • Windows Server gets DNS over HTTPS (DoH) support by Usama Jawad For the past few months, Microsoft has been previewing DNS over HTTPS (DoH) for Windows DNS Server, touting it as a foundational upgrade for zero-trust enterprise networks. It essentially introduces encrypted, authenticated DNS for the networks rather than transmitting DNS traffic in clear. Now, the company has introduced the general availability (GA) of this feature. The GA of DoH encourages organizations to deploy the solution in production environments without implementing a new client-to-resolver architecture. DoH helps improve the overall security of the network and reduces the risk of spoofing due to its zero-trust design. This is a significant change because pretty much every interaction with the network requires interfacing with DNS. DoH offers several advantages over standard DNS traffic, such as encryption using HTTPS, preventing unauthorized inspection, man-in-the-middle attacks, and traffic analysis. Since it leverages TLS certificates so that clients can verify the identity of the DNS server, it prevents spoofing through this authentication mechanism. Additionally, it's built on the DoH standard defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), which means that it should work with modern RFC 8484-compliant clients. Finally, it integrates into the existing network architecture seamlessly and can even run in parallel with standard DNS, so that customers can migrate to the new technology at their own pace. Microsoft says that in the past few months of preview, DoH has become more stable, and customers can confidently deploy it in production environments with proper guidance. Microsoft has emphasized that migrating to DoH is necessary for organizations that are moving toward zero-trust DNS solutions. Windows clients already support DoH, but the latest availability on Windows Server provides encrypted DNS to all endpoints. The company has also mentioned that "while this release focuses on encrypting client-to-resolver communication, support for encrypted communication between Windows DNS Server and upstream DNS resolvers is planned for a future update." You can follow Microsoft's guidance to deploy DoH here, but keep in mind that you need a Windows Server 2025 installation with the latest Patch Tuesday updates installed.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!