[FAQ] How is Linux Layered?


Recommended Posts

"I don't understand how the kernel, OS and GUI are layered in Linux..."

This FAQ is a quick run-down that I have written to briefly introduce GNU/Linux (often referred to as just "Linux") to someone completely unfamiliar with how a typical Linux system is structured. The target audience for this is quite likely someone who is considering installing Linux for the first time, or who has installed it recently, but is having difficulty dealing with the variety of choices.

A Linux system usually consists of several layers, many of which have numerous alternatives available for selection. I will start at the base level, and then build up.

The Linux Kernel: The Engine

www.kernel.org

The heart of a Linux system is the Linux kernel. It is the very low-level software that deals directly with the computer's hardware. On its own, a kernel doesn't do anything. It just sits there waiting to be told what is needed.

The Linux kernel has a production branch that uses an even number as the first number after the decimal point (2.2, 2.4, 2.6, etc.). Any development work that is being worked on for the next major revision of the kernel will use an odd number after the first decimal point (2.5, 2.7) Note, that at the time I am writing this, there is no 2.7 version, as all new features are being quickly incorporated into the production 2.6 series.

The GNU OS: What Really is Running

www.gnu.org

A kernel, by itself, doesn't get work done. This is where the GNU Project (part of the Free Software Foundation, or FSF) comes in. they provide the 'tools' needed to accomplish work. Think of these as the basic set of commands to perform operations.

GNU can be used by other kernels, as well. The FSF's own Hurd kernel (under development) uses it, and there are projects to get GNU on BSD (which typically is a self-contained kernel/OS). The nice thing about this is that the higher levels are independent of the kernel, meaning that you can run the same sets of apps (including Window Managers - more on that later) regardless what kernel you choose to run in the future. (and indeed, BSDs can even run the same apps in their BSD kernel)

The X Window System: Graphics!

www.xfree86.org

www.x.org

The "X Window System", often called "X", is really just a system of handling graphics. There are two popular applications that handle the X protocol: XFree86 and X.org. X.org is a fork from the XFree86 code, just before XFree86 changed their licensing terms in 2004.

It is in X11 that your video driver is used. Also your other input and output devices (such as keyboard, mouse and screen) are declared here.

It is important to note that X does not provide for any sort of advanced windowing functions other than the display of them. User manipulation of the windows (and the decorations, such as titlebars, borders and widgets) is handled by the Window Manager, which we will cover next.

The Window Manager: So many choices...

The realm of managing windows in X is populated with a large variety of Window Managers. This is perhaps the most daunting and confusing thing for Microsoft Windows users to understand about the world of Linux.

In Linux, the user may choose a Window Manger that uses very little system resources, or they may choose ones with more features. This level will provide a fully functional GUI for your Linux box. Some examples include Fluxbox, Sawfish, FVWM, Enlightenment, Metacity and IceWM.

Compiz (or, more properly, Compiz Fusion) with its Emerald window decorator is another Window Manager with special appeal to many. It uses graphics card hardware to run visual effects of warping, zooming, shadows and more. Compiz is closely associated with Gnome, and replaces Metacity in a "3D" Gnome setup. If a user decides to switch back away from this Window Manager into a traditional (no GPU) Window Manager, they must replace it, not just remove Compiz.

The Desktop Environment: The Big Two (plus one)

www.kde.org

www.gnome.org

www.xfce.org

Where can you go beyond a Window Manager? Why, a full-blown Desktop Environment, of course! It continues where a Window Manager leaves off by incorporating things such as a "control panel" like item that lets you adjust your settings for a great deal of peripherals (scanners, printers, keyboards, mice, and anything else you can connect).

A Desktop Environment matches what most Microsoft Windows users expect in an operating system. All of these extra features come at the cost of extra resources being consumed. And, in fact, many people get a current Linux system running on an old box by not using the heavier KDE or Gnome, and getting more life out of the PC. The PC can still be updated with the latest kernel and apps (such as GIMP, OpenOffice.org and Firefox) and be a very capable desktop machine.

While KDE and Gnome have all the extra bells and whistles, if you want to slim down your resource usage, but don't want to sacrifice the convenience of having the added features of a Desktop Environment, XFCE may fit the bill. A self-described "lightweight desktop environment for various *NIX systems", screenshots of these desktops are often featured in our "Desktop" threads.

In Summary

How many layers, and which modular options you choose is up to you. The choices are daunting for someone first looking at them, but these choices make Open Source so exciting and you will have all the tools needed to make your PC work the way you want it to.

I hope this brief summary helps some of those who want to understand what makes up a Linux PC, and takes some of the confusion away. The forums here have many knowledgeable members, many of them are IT professionals (which I am not) and with the experience needed to help you out with guidance to get yourself out of a bind.

Those of you who are reading this and notice an error in what I have said, please let me know so that it can be corrected.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/259962-faq-how-is-linux-layered/
Share on other sites

  Sawyer12 said:
One spelling mistake :p

Edit : Otherwise Well Done (Y). Nice Article.

585135935[/snapback]

:pinch:

I went back and fixed two spelling errors, and three typos where my fingers had a mind of their own. :blush:

  Quote
Some examples include Fluxbox, XFCE, Enlightenment, Metacity and IceWM.

Last time I checked XFCE is a lightweight desktop environment and not a window manager.

From www.xfce.org:

  Quote
"Xfce is a lightweight desktop environment for various *NIX systems.

Designed for productivity, it loads and executes applications fast, while conserving system resources."

  Aeonandromere said:
Last time I checked XFCE is a lightweight desktop environment and not a window manager.

585137503[/snapback]

Their site was very informative.

XFCE uses XFWM4 as the Window Manager.

I will update the first post. (Y)

Edit: Updated the DE section (and edited the listing of WMs at the end of the WM section).

Edit 2: Thank you, everyone for your improvements and compliments. :D

Edited by markjensen
  • 2 weeks later...
  n3wt said:
Very good article, just one thing, BSD is both an OS and a Kernel, it does not in fact include GNU.  (this becomes very apparent when you use a BSD system :p)

585277068[/snapback]

Very correct!

http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html

I will make the appropriate edit. Google shows GNU/BSD as a sourceforge project, and other links with the reference (but some of those may be mis-identified, as I did above).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ALL surveys are voluntary and very few attempt to track the same percipients over time. That doesn't mean they are invalid. Value doesn't claim it is an aggregate of their entire user base, that is why they call it as survey, which means exactly what it is. Yes, if Value created an anonymized collection of ALL users, that would be more accurate than a survey, but that is something they choose not to do. Just like elections are more accurate than political surveys.
    • Just use AI...chatgpt or Copilot will write code for you, then test that and tweak it if needed.
    • One UI 8 reveals Samsung's upcoming tri-fold phone by Taras Buria Samsung Galaxy Flex G prototype shown earlier this year. Source: Samsung Samsung was the pioneer of mainstream foldable phones. Despite the rocky start, the company cemented itself as the go-to option for those who want something more exciting than the standard, boring slab phone. However, during recent years, Samsung foldable phones became a bit stagnant and a target of heavy criticism in light of China-made ultra-thin devices and even tri-folding phones. Now, Samsung is getting ready to strike again. The South Korean giant is holding a special event next week where it is expected to unveil a bunch of new folding phones, including a cheaper Z Flip FE variant. However, the most exciting part of the announcement could be Samsung's first tri-folding smartphone, details about which were discovered in the latest One UI 8 beta build. The uncovered animations reveal a device that is similar to the Galaxy Fold 6 with one extra screen. It shows a tri-camera module and the location of its NFC chip. The inner display houses a punch-hole camera in the upper-right corner. Judging by the looks of it and another punch-hole camera, it appears that when fully unfolded, the outer screen will sit between two panels. Samsung seems to be taking a different route than Huawei, equipping its smartphone with two inward-folding hinges (as shown by the recent Galaxy Flex G concept). It is worth noting that those hinges are not identical, and the phone will have a strict folding procedure. Another animation revealed the phone displaying a warning not to fold the camera side first to prevent screen damage from the camera island. The device name is currently unknown, and the One UI 8 beta build does not reveal much except for "MULTIFOLD7" with its "vertical main," "main," and "reverse main" displays. The exact naming and renders could leak days ahead of the presentations, so Samsung fans should stay tuned for more details. Source: Android Authority
    • In the civilized world, yes. But not in the US of A...
    • The entire western economy is based on the lie that internet ads lead to real sales.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Devesh Beri earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      956400 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      loose_observer earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      BeeJay_Balu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      filminutz earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      449
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      158
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      150
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      65
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!