Apple's advertising for Macs


Would Apple sell more Macs if they advertised them as much as they advertise iPods?  

79 members have voted

  1. 1. Would Apple sell more Macs if they advertised them as much as they advertise iPods?

    • Yes
      46
    • No
      15
    • Wouldn't make any difference
      18


Recommended Posts

For the last year or so, the only Apple advertisements I've seen on TV are for iPods. When was the last time you saw an advertisement for their computers? All of this iPod advertising seems to have paid off, maybe even more so than Apple had planned, since iPods seem to be selling faster than Apple can get them into the stores. I think that if they put as much effort into their advertising for Macs, they would probably sell 10 times (or more) as many as they do currently.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/261054-apples-advertising-for-macs/
Share on other sites

Hard to say really, I remember reading on Forbes earlier this week that Apple are looking to raise their market share significantly in the next year simply based on the fact that so many of the people that are getting ipods, then go on to buy macs.

No, not really.  Advertising may help Apple sell a small amount more Macs, but most people know Apple comps exist.  The average consumer wants a Windows based computer for many different reasons.

585152302[/snapback]

People know iPods exist too, but that hasn't stopped Apple from running daily advertisements for them. I have no doubt that their ad campaign has had a large impact on how many have been sold in the last few months (especially during the holidays). The average consumer wants a computer to get online with, listen to music on, and balance the checkbook on. They also want a computer that is going to be reliable and not plagued by weekly (or even daily) viruses, but many of them don't KNOW that there are other options besides Windows computers. Most of the general public is not even as knowledgeable about technology as the average poster here on Neowin, so they don't realize that many of the problems they associate with computers are ONLY (or at least primarily) Windows problems.

Hard to say really, I remember reading on Forbes earlier this week that Apple are looking to raise their market share significantly in the next year simply based on the fact that so many of the people that are getting ipods, then go on to buy macs.

585152230[/snapback]

Do you happen to have a link for that article? Most of the stuff I've seen from Forbes is generally pro-Windows and anti-everything else. Now Mossberg from the Wall Street Journal is a very active proponent of the Mac.

A programmable electronic machine for processing information

An iPod fits that definition.

an electronic device that executes the instructions in a program. A computer has four functions: inputs data, processes data, produces output, and stores results

An iPod fits that definition.

Refers to a programmable electronic device that can store, retrieve, and process data i.e. a PC.

An iPod fits that definition.

A machine for carrying out calculations and performing specified transformations on information, such as storing, sorting, correlating, retrieving and processing data.

An iPod fits that definition.

A device which processes and stores information digitally.

An iPod fits that definition.

I see a pattern here...

Apple seems to use alot of product placement for their advertising. I can't even count how many TV shows and movies I've seen Mac's in. 24 has G5's everywhere and I've seen Powerbooks in tons of shows. I do think that they need to have good TV ads for their iMac G5's.

An iPod fits that definition.

An iPod fits that definition.

An iPod fits that definition.

An iPod fits that definition.

An iPod fits that definition.

I see a pattern here...

585153290[/snapback]

And as I mentioned, a VCR meets most of those definitions as well. I still don't think most people would consider a VCR (or an iPod) a computer. Anyway, I think most people here are reasonable enough to understand which computers I was talking about in my first post.

Apple seems to use alot of product placement for their advertising. I can't even count how many TV shows and movies I've seen Mac's in. 24 has G5's everywhere and I've seen Powerbooks in tons of shows. I do think that they need to have good TV ads for their iMac G5's.

585153313[/snapback]

Macs are all over the place in my favorite shows as well (all of the CSI shows). CSI:NY is the only one that seems to have an equal number of Windows PC's (mostly Dells, I think), although there are a couple in the other two CSI shows. I see PowerBooks everywhere I look too (even in a couple of print ads for Windows software!!!). Too bad so many shows mask over the Apple logo (although I've seen a few that they missed occasionally). A G4 iMac is kind of hard to miss though (pretty much all of the lab computers on CSI are iMacs).

advertising for their desktops/laptops doesn't have as much of a return on investment as advertising for ipods

Net Sales and Unit Sales by Product[1]

Macintosh net sales: $4.923 billion.

Macintosh unit sales: 3.29 million

iPod net sales: $1.306 billion.

iPod unit sales: 4.4 million.

Net Sales Per Unit

Macintosh: $1,429

iPod: $296

Expenses

Advertising: $209 million.

Research and Development: $489 million.

General administration and sales: $1.421 billion.

Apple generates five times more sales (measured in dollars) with the Macintosh product line than the iPod product line. Apple doesn't break down the profit or expenses per unit, but with only about $300 revenue per iPod I suspect the bulk of Apple's operations funded by the Macintosh product lines which pull in nearly 5 times as much revenue per sale.

i'd be surprised if apple even sold desktops/laptops in 10 years....

You must live in a fantasy world where companies routinely walk away from a profitable and proven five billion dollar per-year business to focus on selling fancy music boxes.

[1] Apple Computer Inc: 2004 SEC Form 10-K

No, not really.  Advertising may help Apple sell a small amount more Macs, but most people know Apple comps exist.  The average consumer wants a Windows based computer for many different reasons.

585152302[/snapback]

Yes, but how many continue to have misconceptions toward Macintosh computers? Look at all the computer geeks on neowin who still have those misconceptions.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Can you read? I've said I'm willing to pay more for a notchless (no notch) 3:2 screen.
    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!