Recommended Posts

I recently tried using a modified uxtheme.dll from here http://themes.belchfire.net/uxtheme...1.2600.1106.rar

Using WinXPro SP1. I can use almost all themes fine, with no problems. Kinda have two questions :x

First, I'm not sure why I can't get transparency to work on themes, such as http://themes.belchfire.net/themes_file-2048.html. Tried googling it and messsing with my video card settings, but I haven't been able to accomplish anything. I haven't tried any software on my system (ie starskin, stylexp, etc), and I'd rather not...but if I have too, then i guess i will :p

Second, I've noticed the skins come in two different types files: "Windows Visual Style File" and "Windows Theme File". The Visual Styles just seem to change the coloring of the current theme. Windows Theme files seem to do quite a bit more (plus I can access them through my Display properties). Anyway, is what I'm saying correct?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/261292-cannot-use-translucent-themesstyles/
Share on other sites

1. are you sure the translucency is in the visual style? you need a separate program to make windows transparent. the only thing you can do inside a visual style is to make it completely clear, i.e. the image isn't drawn. i don't think that's what you're talking about.

2. a visual style IS NOT a theme. read my noob guide:

Q: What is the difference between a theme and a visual style?

A: The terms ?theme? and ?visual style? are often thrown around carelessly and used interchangeably, which adds to the confusion, but the distinction is clear.

A visual style (.msstyles) is the file that skins the windows, taskbar, start menu, and other elements of the Windows appearance. Visual styles are loaded in the appearance tab of the display properties dialog.

A theme (.theme) is a visual style with saved settings, wallpapers, icons, and so on. Themes are loaded in the theme tab of the display properties dialog.

When people say themes, they usually mean visual styles.

Q: My uxtheme did not patch! What do I do?

A: Now hold on there. How do you know it failed? The easiest way to check to see if uxtheme.dll was patched is to simply double-click the msstyles file of a third party theme. If double-clicking loads the display properties dialog with the correct visual style, then the patching process was successful. If not, re-patching is necessary. This time, try manually replacing the file using Replacer (http://www3.telus.net/_/replacer/) in safe mode and make sure the themes service is set to automatic.

Q: Uxtheme was patched successfully, but visual styles do not appear in the appearance tab dropdown list. What do I do?

A: This is a common problem, but one that deserves more attention than it is currently given. The problem is caused by a misnamed visual style folder. For the style to appear in the list, the folder name in which it is residing must correspond to the name of the msstyles file. For instance, gloss.msstyles must be in its visual style folder named ?gloss? in the correct directory (C:\WINDOWS\Resources\Themes) and it will appear. The correct path for the file itself should then be:

C:\WINDOWS\Resources\Themes\gloss\gloss.msstyles

And equivalently, the shell folder should be in the same ?gloss? folder: C:\WINDOWS\Resources\Themes\gloss\shell.

Q: What is a shellstyle and how do I install it?

A: Shellstyle.dll is a file often bundled with the visual style that skins the common tasks pane (and other panes, e.g. the add/remove panel). No installation is necessary. Simply unzip the visual style to the appropriate directory as mentioned above and make sure the shell folder is in the visual style folder along with the msstyles file.

Q: I patched, but my start menu and taskbar are not skinned. What is wrong?

A: First, check to make sure the correct version of the dll is being used. Also try patching in safe mode. Finally, check the directories to see if uxtheme.dll has been misplaced. It should only appear in the system32 folder, and not in the Windows folder.

no u can have transparency in msstyle, its just rather buggy thats all. try out jem's blue glass or blue DWM (cant remember which one, might be both, heh) but anyhow he used magic pink in certain areas of the theme to make some protions of the windows transparent. as i said its buggy but there is no 3rd party app being used.

  MonkeyClaw said:
no u can have transparency in msstyle, its just rather buggy thats all.  try out jem's blue glass or blue DWM (cant remember which one, might be both, heh)  but anyhow he used magic pink in certain areas of the theme to make some protions of the windows transparent.  as i said its buggy but there is no 3rd party app being used.

585159428[/snapback]

that's different. that's what i mentioned earlier about not being drawn. that's a completely see-through look. i think he wants a glass look, which means not 100% transparent.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You know, there needs to be some sort of regulatio... oh wait..
    • I mean, it's fairly self explanatory isn't it? It's part of the reason Apple don't include all features on all supported devices with new iOS releases (another reason is probably a subtle nudge to upgrade sooner), but there's a balance between the remaining features that are added and the impact on performance/battery life on those older devices. There certainly have been times when devices have really received a practical (performance/battery life) quality of life improvement via a software update, but like absolutely every damn app update log out there currently, "Performance and Security improvements" basically mean nothing of real world impacts these days. Just what I've seen of this new interface, the rendering of that glass effect would surely be more complex and intensive than the previous transparency effects, there's no way they couldn't be more efficient. It's probably quite a small impact, otherwise they wouldn't be releasing it, but it all has an impact. Even Microsoft backtracked from Acrylic to Mica material, which is prerendered blur of the wallpaper. All the Acrylic material is rendered live, so has a greater impact, hence why Windows 11 use the newer, lower impact Mica material as their base material.
    • This is the reason Microsoft stepped away from Aero for a more subtler transparency. Apple I believe had the perfect balance of transparency and readability, but not with this redesign in its current form. As for people who believe Windows has an 8-bit interface, well, at least you can read stuff.
    • who ever thought this looked good needs to rethink their design credentials.....
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      greege earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      greege earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      LagFighterZ earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      5i3zi1 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      547
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      230
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      166
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      119
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      91
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!