Canon PowerShot A400 or Samsung Digimax 530?


Recommended Posts

Which is better?

The Canon PowerShot A400 or Samsung Digimax 530?

I noticed the Canon is only a 3.2MP and the Samsung is a 5.1MP. However, I went over to dpreview.com and noticed the Samsung lacks a few things compared to the Canon. I'm confused and not sure which one to get. Any ideas?

Thanks and the reason why i'm comparing is b/c these are on sale.

Canon PowerShot A400 $199CDN and Samsung Digimax 530 $250CDN :)

What sort of things does the Samsung lack over the Canon? They seem pretty close to me. I'd get the Samsung, as it seems like a bargain. Either way you can't go wrong. I own a Canon camera and am generally pleased with it. I just wish that mine had optical zoom.

Okay here are some of the things the Samsung lacks or I think lacks.

- Sensor size on Canon is larger.

- ISO rating 50 apprently isn't on the Samsung.

- Auto focus type on Samsung is TTL while the Canon is Ai AF TTL 9-point

- Max shutter on Canon is 1/1500 sec while Samsung is 1/2000 sec

- Exposure compensation on Canon is -2 EV to +2 EV in 1/3 EV steps, while Samsung -2 EV to +2 EV in 1/2 EV steps

- Metering on Canon is Evaluative, Center Weighted, Spot while Samsung is Multi, Spot

- And last of all, the Samsung doesn't have a Orientation sensor on it while Canon does.

Anyone know if the Samsung is still better than the Canon? Thanks :)

do u really need the zoom, id go for canon they make awesome cameras and samsung are just one of those other brands. mp's rnt that important unless ur making a really big photo nd 3.2 is plenty. its all in the lens and other stuff, i think.

Man, I live in Canada too and I'm looking to buy that camera

but at Futureshop and Best Buy its sold out!

I'm in Ontario so let me know if you can tell me where to get that Cannon PowerShot A400! It looks like a keeper

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!