Recommended Posts

Can someone tell me why all Mac desktops look the "same" is there no way to truly modify it like other OSs?

585681682[/snapback]

I have no idea what you're talking about. ShapeShifter provides plenty of ways to modify OS X to look completely different.

Not trolling, I just want to see OSX different than like they are out of the box. For example not using the built-in dock or not using the bar on top like you usually see.

585682167[/snapback]

A lot of people do not use the dock or move it around. The menubar cannot be moved.

Can someone tell me why all Mac desktops look the "same" is there no way to truly modify it like other OSs?

585681682[/snapback]

You mean like how every windows screenshot has a start button and taskbar?

:p

Can you replace explorer in windows? No, not in my experience.

From my time as a windows user, I don't remember being able to change that much beyond the window decorations and graphics. It still behaved like windows and you still ended up using explorer.

Not trolling, I just want to see OSX different than like they are out of the box. For example not using the built-in dock or not using the bar on top like you usually see.

585682167[/snapback]

You can replace the mac finder with pathfinder if you wish. There is an article on macosxhints on how to permanently replace it.

Want to replace the dock? Check out Dragthing:

http://www.dragthing.com/english/about.html

Look familiar? Stardock's newer versions of Object dock is a blatant rip.

Want to auto-hide the menubar? Checkout barmaid.ape.

http://home.comcast.net/~ckoenigsfeld/index.html

Want a NextStep Style menu? Check out:

Stepmenu

Here is my demo of Barmaid and Stepmenu with Swiz's NeXT theme.

osxstep_sm.jpg

:rolleyes:

Ummmm... yes you can replace explorer. That's what Litestep, Geoshell, etc. are all about and no those don't run on top of explorer like objectbar. I have been replacing explorer for many years. Just check out litestep.net and you'll see plenty of desktops not running explorer. And http://shellfront.org/ for other shell information. I have a lot of experience in this (since 1999, if you don't believe me about customizing in '99 look at this: http://desktopian.org/tinthms/pages/mo85macthm.html Explorer is not running in that shot). On my PC on my user account I have litestep going with aqua stuff running on top of it and in my admin account I have bblean going which provides a black box type desktop.

And before anyone starts, I'm also a mac user here's my Mac deskop: http://screenshots.haque.net/screenshots/v...nshot-26283.jpg

You mean like how every windows screenshot has a start button and taskbar?

:p

Can you replace explorer in windows? No, not in my experience.

From my time as a windows user, I don't remember being able to change that much beyond the window decorations and graphics. It still behaved like windows and you still ended up using explorer.

You can replace the mac finder with pathfinder if you wish. There is an article on macosxhints on how to permanently replace it.

Want to replace the dock? Check out Dragthing:

http://www.dragthing.com/english/about.html

Look familiar? Stardock's newer versions of Object dock is a blatant rip.

Want to auto-hide the menubar? Checkout barmaid.ape.

http://home.comcast.net/~ckoenigsfeld/index.html

Want a NextStep Style menu? Check out:

Stepmenu

Here is my demo of Barmaid and Stepmenu with Swiz's NeXT theme.

osxstep_sm.jpg

:rolleyes:

585682409[/snapback]

Edited by smoke
Ummmm... yes you can replace explorer. That's what Litestep, Geoshell, etc. are all about and no those don't run on top of explorer like objectbar. I have been replacing explorer for many years. Just check out litestep.net and you'll see plenty of desktops not running explorer. And http://shellfront.org/ for other shell information. I have a lot of experience in this (since 1998).

And before anyone starts, I'm also a mac user here's my Mac deskop: http://screenshots.haque.net/screenshots/v...nshot-26283.jpg

585685628[/snapback]

Lightstep does not replace the explorer unless something dramatic changed since I used it back in 2002. If you make a call to open a folder via a script, explorer will open up. All it does replace is the taskbar, tray area and startbutton IIRC.

I was in the modding scene between 1996-2002 on the PC on customize.org, wincustomize.com, aqua-soft.org and several others, so don't **** on me and tell me it's raining.

When you follow the directions to replace the Finder with Pathfinder, "any" call (within a program or script) for the finder will launch pathfinder instead. It is a complete replacement.

It's also possible to make other file managers pop up instead of Explorer and not by doing it manually there are some file managers that let you check a box and whenever the file manager is called they pop up instead of explorer like this one: http://www.v-com.com/product/PowerDesk_Pro_Features.html which I have used before. If you've been modding as long as you claim you shouldn't need for me to tell you that. So yes, if you use a shell and those programs you have essentially "replaced" explorer by your definition I.E. you are not using it for either the desktop or file manager. And if you are going to get vulgar (and immature) because I said something contrary to what you said, then don't **** on me and tell me it's raining either.

Edited by smoke

Preview.png

| Clean | --- | Dirty |

Theme: Milk 3.0 Blue Chrome

Wallpaper: Mickey Mouse / Personal Mod / Not for release (just cut it off)

Icons: MINIUM?, UltraGrey, Mac OSX

Apps:> Silk, ShapeShifter, Byte Controller, wClock, AdiumX, Transparent Dock

Font:> HandelGotDLig

System:> Mac OSX 10.3.8

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!