Recommended Posts

:whistle: Very simple Leopard Desktop, good to calm the mind and nerves...

Before anyone asks about the memory, I wanted to see if it was possible to read that much, no, I don't know if it's addressing it and no you can't have the chips after I'm done with them. :p

Its that a macbook pro?

If the system its reading that much its adressing it but only the 64-bit compiled apps will detect all of it. Fortunately the core can manage it so its still more efficient.

Its that a macbook pro?

If the system its reading that much its adressing it but only the 64-bit compiled apps will detect all of it. Fortunately the core can manage it so its still more efficient.

Yes, this is my work work MacBook Pro. My Work MBP took a swan-dive today, still enough to make a girl tear up. :(

Yes, this is my work work MacBook Pro. My Work MBP took a swan-dive today, still enough to make a girl tear up. :(

Sad to hear that :(

This gives me hope then. I have 4gb installed and sometimes its not enough since I work with scanned film and each photo can be as large as 1gb.

It would be great to have an 8gb RAM photography/film editing mobile machine.

Sad to hear that :(

This gives me hope then. I have 4gb installed and sometimes its not enough since I work with scanned film and each photo can be as large as 1gb.

It would be great to have an 8gb RAM photography/film editing mobile machine.

Ya, it hurt me pretty bad to see it dead and bleeding. Hard Drive seems fine though, reads in an external bay just fine so I lucked out there. (Yes, I have data that isn't backed up...yes I know about Time Machine....yes I have an external drive I just haven't gotten around to it. ;))

The biggest issue with breaching 4GB of RAM is of course the price and acquisition of the chips. You pretty much have to go straight to a vendor to get a SO-DIMM of this size and the cost is unbelievably high. I don't expect to see it anytime soon in Apple, or anyone else's for that matter, lineup.

The biggest issue with breaching 4GB of RAM is of course the price and acquisition of the chips. You pretty much have to go straight to a vendor to get a SO-DIMM of this size and the cost is unbelievably high. I don't expect to see it anytime soon in Apple, or anyone else's for that matter, lineup.

I would still see it as an investment, not an expense.

Its just the new line of macbook pros that can handle that much ram? Because I have a Core 2 Duo at 2.2ghz version

I would still see it as an investment, not an expense.

Its just the new line of macbook pros that can handle that much ram? Because I have a Core 2 Duo at 2.2ghz version

For what it's worth I put those same SO-DIMMS in my 2.4 current gen and it never would display the amount of memory in About This Mac, however the machine appeared to operate normally.

Weird, that space was blank?

Still, the fact that the machine booted up and the os loaded and worked suggest that the machine was indeed using the ram. Maybe (most probably) its an os problem so I can only hope that the 10.5.3 update resolves this.

Weird, that space was blank?

Still, the fact that the machine booted up and the os loaded and worked suggest that the machine was indeed using the ram. Maybe (most probably) its an os problem so I can only hope that the 10.5.3 update resolves this.

10.5.3 was running on that MacBook Pro also so I'm not sure what the difference was, the field was just empty as so was the processor field, almost like an overflow caused it to not be able to display the data. It's one of those things that could be cosmetic because who ever expected someone to get their hands on 4GB chips. ;)

10.5.3 was running on that MacBook Pro also so I'm not sure what the difference was, the field was just empty as so was the processor field, almost like an overflow caused it to not be able to display the data. It's one of those things that could be cosmetic because who ever expected someone to get their hands on 4GB chips. ;)

Just curiosity and to stop this thread hijack, how much its each chip? :p

desktopthumb.png

Wall: Flora Carpet by iamshaon

Dock / Indicators : Float

Dock Drawers : Here

HDD Icon : Agua Extras Vol. 1

Since this SS i switched from the Frost drawers ( shown) to the silver version

Edited by Hell-In-A-Handbasket
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!