Recommended Posts

I don't think critique should be necessary at all. It's a topic for posting our desktops, and that's it. It's not a group discussion on "proper" desktop management.

So people are allowed to say, "Awesome desktop", "Cool desktop", "So clean, nice", but they're not allowed to go the other way? :blink:

So people are allowed to say, "Awesome desktop", "Cool desktop", "So clean, nice", but they're not allowed to go the other way? :blink:

Not necessarily but personal preference isn't something you can pass or fail at... it's one of those things that fall in the category of no right or wrong answer... There is no right or wrong desktop... ONLY what works for you and what you like.

Now people can agree or disagree so to speak... they can either like your style or taste when it comes to desktops or not. The counter part to the "Awesome Desktop" type of comments would be more along the lines of "Not for me" or "I don't really like that one" or "Too much going on for my taste" but certainly not a pass or fail type of thing as if desktops were some sort of test to see if the all mighty mod and desktop gods condone or bless your desktop lol.

The Webkit nightlies are undoubtedly fast. VERY fast. They also use an awful lot of RAM when you keep the browser open over a few hours though - I've seen Webkit use > 500 MB of RAM. Firefox 3 on the other hand rarely uses > 200 MB. Bit of a difference really, don't you think?

The Webkit nightlies are undoubtedly fast. VERY fast. They also use an awful lot of RAM when you keep the browser open over a few hours though - I've seen Webkit use > 500 MB of RAM. Firefox 3 on the other hand rarely uses > 200 MB. Bit of a difference really, don't you think?

Most of those issues haven't been showing up to me lately, I've had this Webkit window open for about 27 hours now... First column is real memory used, second is virtual memory reserved.

513 WebKit xxxxx 10.4 15 147.81 MB 1.10 GB Intel

Maybe it's a 10.5.3 fix that hasn't been widely publicized.

Most of those issues haven't been showing up to me lately, I've had this Webkit window open for about 27 hours now... First column is real memory used, second is virtual memory reserved.

513 WebKit xxxxx 10.4 15 147.81 MB 1.10 GB Intel

Maybe it's a 10.5.3 fix that hasn't been widely publicized.

I'll give the latest nightly a shot. Speaking of 10.5.3 - when is it going to be out?

The Webkit nightlies are undoubtedly fast. VERY fast. They also use an awful lot of RAM when you keep the browser open over a few hours though - I've seen Webkit use > 500 MB of RAM. Firefox 3 on the other hand rarely uses > 200 MB. Bit of a difference really, don't you think?

What's the point of RAM if you don't use it :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Of course the problem was Secure Boot's new certificates. Install media created by the official Media Creation Tool is already signed with a valid certificate from Microsoft, so maybe that certificate isn't "up-to-date" enough for machines with the new ones installed in the UEFI. There's really no other logical explanation.
    • Here is how I fixed Windows 11 not booting after clean installation by Taras Buria Story time. A couple of weeks ago, I experienced a very odd thing with my computers. I was trying to reinstall Windows 11 on my primary device, and everything was going smoothly until the installer performed the first restart. After that, my computer entered the boot disk selection screen instead of continuing the setup process. Huh, that's odd, said I, and selected Windows Boot Manager only to see it fall back into the same screen right away. Then I tried booting from the USB drive with the same result—the PC kept returning to the boot device selection screen, and removing the drive would send my PC to UEFI, again, with no way to launch Windows 11. I fired up my spare laptop, which has been sitting unused for quite a while, to see if I am dealing with a defective USB drive. Nope, Windows 11 installed and started without issues. After trying another drive and checking all the possible settings in UEFI, I decided to try disabling Secure Boot. Lo and behold, Windows 11 started as it should have been in the first place, continued the setup process, and reached the initial setup screen. Victory! After I finished the setup and applied all updates, I re-enabled Secure Boot, and Windows 11 started without issues. Some time later, I tried reinstalling Windows 11 on my laptop only to experience similar issues, with UEFI claiming a Secure Boot violation. I checked whether the drive works on my main PC, and yes, it installed Windows 11 without errors. I scratched my head, went to UEFI, turned off Secure Boot, and installed Windows 11 without issues. After that, I enabled Secure Boot. Note: I used the official Media Creation Tool app for my USB drive. Also, UEFI was properly configured for Windows 11, including no Legacy Mode, a GPT-partitioned drive, and TPM and Secure Boot enabled. From my experience, if you are dealing with similar symptoms, I recommend two things: If you use old Windows 11 install media, create a new one with the latest Windows 11 release, especially if you know your PC already has the latest Secure Boot certificates. If you cannot create a new one, turn off Secure Boot, complete the installation, download all available updates, and then re-enable Secure Boot in UEFI. Note that you need to turn off Secure Boot after installing Windows 11. Otherwise, the installer won't run, claiming a hardware requirements mismatch. I believe the problem hides in Secure Boot certificates that expire this month. Microsoft is currently rolling out new certificates, and maybe a mismatch was causing these issues for both of my systems. I am out of my depth to make a definitive statement; this article is flagged as "Opinion," as I only share my experience and some tips on how to fix the problem. If some of you possess deeper knowledge and understanding of the situation, please share it in the comments. As for everyone else struggling with computers not booting after a clean install, the two steps above should get you out of the pickle.
    • I gave the tool a chance the other day to make a USB. An hour later it was stuck at 0% downloaded. I downloaded the official ISO, downloaded Rufus, and made the USB myself in 15 min.
    • <Moved to software discussion and support> I've got fond memories of Winamp. Changing the skins, the different visualisations etc. But now I just need a simple music player. MSN messenger would be another one, MSN Messenger Plus (I think?) offered so many different plugins. But again, it probably wouldn't work for me these days. And then there is miRC. i think it's still going these days, but lord i had fun with that back in the day. Now it's mostly stuff like Discord, WhatsApp group chats, Signal, Telegram... /me is showing his age...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!