Recommended Posts

My friends make fun of me, because even though I have 1.5GB of RAM, i never install anything like this because it uses Memory.  :)

Memory is precious.....

585222896[/snapback]

To me, it's more than worth it. I hate using a desktop that doesn't have a dock on it. It keeps my desktop icon free and shortcuts are still one click away.

To me, it's more than worth it. I hate using a desktop that doesn't have a dock on it. It keeps my desktop icon free and shortcuts are still one click away.

585222954[/snapback]

thats why i use to use it, but ever since one of my sticks died on me i hate to use it. But y'z dock doesnt use much memory, imo, is the best so far let's see how this one measures up to it....

My friends make fun of me, because even though I have 1.5GB of RAM, i never install anything like this because it uses Memory.  :)

Memory is precious.....

585222896[/snapback]

GRRRRRR!!!! Use itttttttt lol, I have only a 128MB and want to run one of them grrrrr...

Why use a dock when you can use quick launch? I never understood that. I tried all 3 docks. Yz, Object, and another who'se name I can't remember, and I never liked them. QuickLaucnh works fine for me, but I'll try this when it gets out of alpha. Maybe it will sway me, but I doubt it.

Why use a dock when you can use quick launch?  I never understood that.  I tried all 3 docks.  Yz, Object, and another who'se name I can't remember, and I never liked them.  QuickLaucnh works fine for me, but I'll try this when it gets out of alpha.  Maybe it will sway me, but I doubt it.

585246453[/snapback]

I started using objectdock because it keeps the desktop tidy looking, but I keep using it mostly because of sysstats. I did have 6 seperate widget programs running and it was killing my pc. Objectdock and sysstats does it all for a fraction of the memory. Even my old 1ghz celeron doesn't slow down with it. I still enjoy bashing Stardock, but I have to give em credit(card) when it comes to OD+.

I tried objectdock before and quite useful. However i stop using it as some people said it slow down game. Quick launch still my best choice although less eye candy and i can put several folders contain different category of program shortcuts (like tabbed category in full objeckdock ver.).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      444
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!