Recommended Posts

Custom color masks (since forcing it would cause the red close button to change color, among other things)

Okay, that might be a bit much to ask given everything in the skin :p

To be honest the skin is already amazing. I can't think of much of anything extra to do that goes beyond the normal WB enhancements like the dialog skinning and toolbars.

Personally I prefered the inset on the titlebar stretching to both sides, not around the text.

585225412[/snapback]

Yes, me too. it looks so much better with the inset being full, no matter how much text there is.

Also, on the msstyle, using the Arial version (best looking), some command button text gets cut off in .net apps. Does this happen in WB?

Yes, me too. it looks so much better with the inset being full, no matter how much text there is.

Also, on the msstyle, using the Arial version (best looking), some command button text gets cut off in .net apps. Does this happen in WB?

585226112[/snapback]

I think Im going to keep the full inset, I prefer it too hehe.

I dont know about the font I cant test it :argh: hehe

well, if you want, and I'm sure you get this a lot, I'd be willing to quickly test it out. The app I'm developing runs into this problem on the replace toolbar, so it will be easy to find. I could always delete the theme once checking. Just a thought to try to help you out.

well, if you want, and I'm sure you get this a lot, I'd be willing to quickly test it out. The app I'm developing runs into this problem on the replace toolbar, so it will be easy to find. I could always delete the theme once checking. Just a thought to try to help you out.

585226291[/snapback]

I have problems with all the programs that I create with Visual Basic if I create a manifest to use Visual Style in the programs. I really dont know why that happens :huh:

Kol,

Big fan of this theme. I'm using it in Windowblinds (via import through SkinStudio).

Even though it's near perfect now, can we expect any WindowBlinds-exclusive pieces?

Also, I'm assuming you have Icandy Jr.'s expansion icons in your pics (and shellstyle). In case you know (or if FOOOD's reading this), do you have any idea how close FOOOD is to releasing his Icandy Jr expansion?

sweetness. never used this in msstyle coz i run WB exclusively nowadays.. can't wait for the port to be completed! nice work as always Kol

585231430[/snapback]

I wouldn't deny some great msstyles because you run windowblinds. You should use Skinstudio to import them. Not always 100% accuracy, but DAMN close.

Edit - Like I said above, I've been running this theme in windowblinds and have YET to find ANY problem.

I wouldn't deny some great msstyles because you run windowblinds.  You should use Skinstudio to import them.  Not always 100% accuracy, but DAMN close.

Edit - Like I said above, I've been running this theme in windowblinds and have YET to find ANY problem.

585231455[/snapback]

ya i have reverted back and forth because of some pretty amazing msstyles lately, but i've been working on a few WB skins so it's kinda been necessary to stay in WB. I do a lot of porting and fixing of msstyles to WB.. half of the fun in using an msstyle is converting it and customizing/correcting it!! I guess I shouldn't have made it sound like I despise msstlyes.. :D

This may sound weird, but I'd really like to see a port with fully skinned logon/shutdown dialogs. Skinstudio Pro does a wonderful job on everything else, but due to the lack of support in msstyles themselves, it leaves WB imports looking odd.

585234113[/snapback]

Yes, please give us all the WB goodies. Logoff/Shutdown dialogs, progess anims, toolbar icons, ect... Too many people do ports of thier msstyles and don't include these things. It kind of makes the port useless if it is not adding anything.

Im going to include LogOff/Shutdown dialogs, all parts that msstyle doesnt skins are going to be skinned. I dont know yet if Im going to create toolbar and animations. I'll need FOOOD permission first. :)

Im going to include LogOff/Shutdown dialogs, all parts that msstyle doesnt skins are going to be skinned. I dont know yet if Im going to create toolbar and animations. I'll need FOOOD permission first. :)

585235622[/snapback]

Need any WB beta testers? ;)

Actually, I'd like to see if the progress bar problem I was having and the Wireless app issue I was seeing are fixed with the build you have of the skin when it's native to WB.

Thanks for the great work on it too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!