Real? International Scholar Laureate Program


Recommended Posts

I got a fancy letter today. From the International Scholar Laureate Program Delegation on Technology in China. They say I was nominated to participate because of my exemplary leadership, exceptional academic performance, and because I am a member of The National Dean's List. Blah, blah, blah..... I've heard worse.

I quote from their website :

Participants travel to Beijing, Shenzen and Shanghai, where they will have an opportunity to see first-hand why U.S. and European technology companies are rapidly shifting their research and development functions to China. Students get an up-close look at the technological, financial and competitive forces that fuel the high-speed race for power in the field of technology. Participants also examine the ways in which China's education system prepares future technology leaders, and the challenges of government requirements and regulations.

The catch is that I have to pay over $5000 dollars for the 16-day program plus personal expenses.

I have to figure out if this is for real or some kind of scam. I might try to do it if it is real.

Anybody heard of this, or maybe know someone or are themselves someone who participated? It sounds like a good opportunity, but could be a scam.

What do you guys think?

  • 3 years later...

Hi,

Although this thread is old, I really hope to find some help.

1. I read about the GYLC in the newspapers and thought it sounded great. So I went to surf around and chance upon International Scholars Laureate Program.

2. Now I'm worried. I can't find out anything about the company on the site. Is the International Scholars Laureate Program legitimate? I'm worried as I'm embarking on fundraising...

3. Since you have worked there before, if it was legitimate, I would like to know, what kind of students go for their conferences? The Ivy Leagues, or the run of the mills colleges kind of students?

4. Has anyone been there? Please contact me.

Many thanks and gratitude!

  • 3 weeks later...

I went through this same thing last year. I got the letter, no one in my school had heard of it, and I was worried it was a scam. I thought long and hard about it, and finally opted to give it a shot, and I'm so glad I did.

It is a for-profit organization--but that doesn't mean it isn't both educational and worth-while. I went on the Technology trip to China this Spring and was overwhelmed by how much I enjoyed myself. The advisors they sent with us were wonderful, the hotels/stops/etc top-notch (don't let the fact that one of the hotels is a Days Inn fool you, even it was a very nice hotel), and our local guides were outstanding. It's *the* way to see China if you can afford it. No worrying about getting lost, how to arrange for travel, etc. You get to see many cities and many sights where if you went on your own you'd probably stay a week in the same city.

I really would encourage any one to try it, even though the price is a bit steep. There are scholarships, but they do not cover much I don't think.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'd say the first one failed to be as popular as Apple anticipated, but the easy adjustment here is to make fewer of them next time around. It would only be a "flop" if it isn't possible for Apple to recover the design and factory tooling costs given the number of units sold, which I doubt would be the case. It isn't like no one bought them; it just failed to become the new hot phone of the year.
    • You're right that it does not follow the plain meaning of the word, but in this context, it is a legal term defined in 49 U.S.C. Kind of how "wire fraud" laws apply even if a physical wire was not used. Given that it is codified in law, and it isn't just automotive journalists that don't understand evolving technology, I highly doubt congress would change a well understood term just because technology makes the term slightly less actuate.
    • This is exactly why I keep saying we are not ready for human free self-driving. These little "bugs" are may seem like random one-offs. There was also the Waymo that drove between police with drawn weapons and the suspect they were pointing them at. From a software perspective it is easy to understand how those extremely rare situations may not have been programed for, but that is the point. If AI needs to be told to watch out for every possible contingency, then it can never be successful. There will always be the possibility of a first encounter that the AI needs to understand to avoid.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Final by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 | 14.6MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      586
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      74
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!