Recommended Posts

1. If you want a version without something on it, ask and I will make it.

2. They are models (the one on the left (Laura) is from Empire clothing) and I'm sure they're over 18 if they're posing like that and are on the internet.

3. Nothing bad is showing and I'm sure we've all seen worse than that.

4. I didn't make the images of the girls, however, who did make them for me did a great job.

5. I could care less if the Aurora is real or fake. Go to AeroXperience and take it up with there members because that's where it came from. I don't have or use Longhorn or really care that much for it, but sometimes it has nice wallpapers and effects.

6. Yes, it'd work better without the girls or perhaps if the background itself was of higher resolution. I'll do a few more different versions.

your "real" aurora is fake and the girls are hos.  Better luck next time.

585230360[/snapback]

That's there problem and not mine. Show me a real Aurora than if that's fake. And quite a lot of people liked my other works, so my luck is doing just fine. I'm just a bit unique.

So how about some more constructive criticism and less postcount+ spamming.

I'm going to remove somethings and increase the res so it might look better.

Is it correct to display pictures here which show young girls with their knickers showing?

585229397[/snapback]

Skank alert.

585229439[/snapback]

It's just a girl in pantys man...

585229464[/snapback]

it's probably just them shorts that make that chicks ass look big

585229482[/snapback]

the girls are hos.

585230360[/snapback]

Those girls are nasty skanks. That first one really seems to be into her own ass :p

585232642[/snapback]

They are called MODELS and are just posing in different clothes for ads. Just because they are dressed like that and posing like that doesn't mean they are "skanks".

They are called MODELS and are just posing in different clothes for ads. Just because they are dressed like that and posing like that doesn't mean they are "skanks".

585232676[/snapback]

Yes, My mother would love me to bring home a girl wearing an outfit that shows her undies, and flipping her off. 100% Sunday School girls!

Yes, My mother would love me to bring home a girl wearing an outfit that shows her undies, and flipping her off.  100% Sunday School girls!

585232701[/snapback]

:laugh: To each their own I suppose. :rofl: I probably wouldn't bring home girls like that either. :p They were probably paid and told to pose like that. :rolleyes:

Anyway, the site I got the original background from is down, but when when I notice it's back up again I'll try to work out something better.

Ah yes of course. Just because a person dresses like that they love to sleep around and are sluts, skanks, hos. :rolleyes:

585232732[/snapback]

hey you never know :rofl: anyways i know your a cool member here and prety cool. But man your thread got crapped on big time

I'm not sure that I would want a wallpaper that flips me off. If that turns you on, then you need to just start taking Viagra, it probably works better than that anyway.

Oh and by the way, those might be models, but then again if you think about it, hoes are models too.

Edit: Not choosing sides at all. Worse things have been posted on Neowin. They don't really fit into the picture though.... try some other background. Not sure what, but I'm sure you'll think of something.

hey you never know :rofl: anyways i know your a cool member here and prety cool. But man your thread got crapped on big time

585232745[/snapback]

Hey thanks man. No prob. I think you're a good member too. :)

I found a copy of the original background. I'm going to make a few different versions for at least the few people that (some what) liked the idea(s). Everyone else have fun in here while it lasts, because if it gets too far off track I'm requesting it closed. :ninja:

your "real" aurora is fake and the girls are hos.  Better luck next time.

585230360[/snapback]

Take a break to wash your eyes, this Aurora Background is more real then you are, if you have Avalon CTP installed you can even see it in action...

But I guess you don't...

Hey thanks man. No prob. I think you're a good member too. :)

I found a copy of the original background. I'm going to make a few different versions for at least the few people that (some what) liked the idea(s). Everyone else have fun in here while it lasts, because if it gets too far off track I'm requesting it closed. :ninja:

585232773[/snapback]

Yep, I think chaning the background would help a lot. I still don't like her flipping me off though, too bad about that. :pinch:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This one baffles me...so they are creating a museum based around the Ship of Theseus? A museum is supposed to preserve things. It doesn't really work if the conversation goes, "I gazed upon Starry Night the other day, the colours were beautiful!" "Yeah...I didn't expect Godzilla to show up, though." Create a building devoted to displaying AI work, fine. The rainforest idea sounds interesting and I would consider visiting if they pay me a few bucks. But don't call it a museum...
    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!